default: llvm_unreachable("This action is not supported yet!");
-- so I'm adding one to the third switch block, too.
This is a follow-up fix for http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250830
Summary:
TargetLoweringBase::Expand is defined as "Try to expand this to other ops,
otherwise use a libcall." For ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV, the choice between
the two possibilities was defined in a rather convoluted way:
- if DIVREM is legal, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM has a custom lowering, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM libcall is defined and a remainder from the same division is
computed elsewhere, expand to a DIVREM libcall
- else, expand to a DIV libcall
This had the undesirable effect that if both DIV and DIVREM are implemented
as libcalls, then ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV are expanded to the heavier DIVREM
libcall, even when the remainder isn't used.
The new code adds a new LegalizeAction, TargetLoweringBase::LibCall, so that
backends can directly control whether they prefer an expansion or a conversion
to a libcall. This makes the generic lowering code even more generic,
allowing its reuse in a wider range of target-specific configurations.
The useful effect is that ARM backend will now generate a call
to __aeabi_{i,u}div rather than __aeabi_{i,u}divmod in cases where
it doesn't need the remainder. There's no functional change outside
the ARM backend.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin
Subscribers: t.p.northover, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250826
Summary:
In addition to moving the code over, this patch amends the DIV,REM -> DIVREM
combining to run on all affected nodes at once: if the nodes are converted
to DIVREM one at a time, then the resulting DIVREM may get legalized by the
backend into something target-specific that we won't be able to recognize
and correlate with the remaining nodes.
The motivation is to "prepare terrain" for D13862: when we set DIV and REM
to be legalized to libcalls, instead of the DIVREM, we otherwise lose the
ability to combine them together. To prevent this, we need to take the
DIV,REM -> DIVREM combining out of the lowering stage.
Reviewers: RKSimon, eli.friedman, rengolin
Subscribers: john.brawn, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13733
llvm-svn: 250825
Summary:
Some shared code for handling eh.exceptionpointer and eh.exceptioncode
needs to not share the part that truncates to 32 bits, which is intended
just for exception codes.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13747
llvm-svn: 250588
Summary:
Caching SDLoc(N), instead of recreating it in every single
function call, keeps the code denser, and allows to unwrap long lines.
Reviewers: sunfish, atrick, sdmitrouk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13726
llvm-svn: 250305
Summary: The two implementations had more code in common than not.
Reviewers: sunfish, MatzeB, sdmitrouk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13724
llvm-svn: 250302
The comment says this was stopped because it was unlikely to be
profitable. This is not true if you want to combine vector loads
with multiple components.
For a simple case that looks like
t0 = load t0 ...
t1 = load t0 ...
t2 = load t0 ...
t3 = load t0 ...
t4 = store t0:1, t0:1
t5 = store t4, t1:0
t6 = store t5, t2:0
t7 = store t6, t3:0
We want to get all of these stores onto a chain
that is a TokenFactor of these N loads. This mostly
solves the AMDGPU merge-stores.ll regressions
with -combiner-alias-analysis for merging vector
stores of vector loads.
llvm-svn: 250138
This basic combine was surprisingly missing.
AMDGPU legalizes many operations in terms of 32-bit vector components,
so not doing this results in many extra copies and subregister extracts
that need to be cleaned up later.
InstCombine already does this for the hasOneUse case. The target hook
is to fix a handful of tests which break (e.g. ARM/vmov.ll) which turn
from a vector materialize repeated immediate instruction to a constant
vector load with more scalar copies from it.
llvm-svn: 250129
When lowering invoke statement, all unwind destinations are directly added as successors of call site block, and the weight of those new edges are not assigned properly. Actually, default weight 16 are used for those edges. This patch calculates the proper edge weights for those edges when collecting all unwind destinations.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13354
llvm-svn: 250119
We have a number of functions that implement constant folding of vectors (unary and binary ops) in near identical manners (and the differences don't appear to be critical).
This patch introduces a common implementation (SelectionDAG::FoldConstantVectorArithmetic) and calls this in both the unary and binary op cases.
After this initial patch I intend to begin enabling vector constant folding for a wider number of opcodes in SelectionDAG::getNode().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13665
llvm-svn: 250118
This was a minor bug in r249492. Calling PrepareEHLandingPad on a
non-landingpad was a no-op, but it attempted to get the generic pointer
register class, which apparently doesn't exist for some targets.
llvm-svn: 250068
On targets where f32 is not legal, we have to look through a BITCAST SDNode to
find the register that an argument is stored in when emitting debug info, or we
will not be able to emit a DW_AT_location for it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13005
llvm-svn: 250056
The new implementation works at least as well as the old implementation
did.
Also delete the associated preparation tests. They don't exercise
interesting corner cases of the new implementation. All the codegen
tests of the EH tables have already been ported.
llvm-svn: 249918
I'll be using the function in a similar combine for AArch64. The helper was
also improved to handle undef values.
Part of http://reviews.llvm.org/D13442
llvm-svn: 249572
Summary:
Set the pad MBB as a funclet entry for CoreCLR as well as MSVCCXX, and
update state numbering to put the catchpad block rather than its normal
successor into the unwind map.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13492
llvm-svn: 249569
Our current emission strategy is to emit the funclet prologue in the
CatchPad's normal destination. This is problematic because
intra-funclet control flow to the normal destination is not erroneous
and results in us reevaluating the prologue if said control flow is
taken.
Instead, use the CatchPad's location for the funclet prologue. This
correctly models our desire to have unwind edges evaluate the prologue
but edges to the normal destination result in typical control flow.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13424
llvm-svn: 249483
Summary:
Assign one state number per handler/funclet, tracking parent state,
handler type, and catch type token.
State numbers are arranged such that ancestors have lower state numbers
than their descendants.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: pgavlin, AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13450
llvm-svn: 249457
Summary:
- Add CoreCLR to if/else ladders and switches as appropriate.
- Rename isMSVCEHPersonality to isFuncletEHPersonality to better
reflect what it captures.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: pgavlin, AndyAyers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13449
llvm-svn: 249455
visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG calls SelectionDAG::getNode to constant fold scalar constants but handles vector constants itself, despite getNode being capable of dealing with them.
This required a minor change to the getNode implementation to actually deal with cases where the scalars of a BUILD_VECTOR were wider integers than the vector type - which was the only extra ability of the visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG implementation.
No codegen intended and all existing tests remain the same.
llvm-svn: 249236
Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet.
However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is
part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet
membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node.
llvm-svn: 249052
The Win64 unwinder disassembles forwards from each PC to try to
determine if this PC is in an epilogue. If so, it skips calling the EH
personality function for that frame. Typically, this means you cannot
catch an exception in the same frame that you threw it, because 'throw'
calls a noreturn runtime function.
Previously we avoided this problem with the TrapUnreachable
TargetOption, but that's a much bigger hammer than we need. All we need
is a 1 byte non-epilogue instruction right after the call. Instead,
what we got was an unconditional branch to a shared block containing the
ud2, potentially 7 bytes instead of 1. So, this reverts r206684, which
added TrapUnreachable, and replaces it with something better.
The new code pattern matches for invoke/call followed by unreachable and
inserts an int3 into the DAG. To be 100% watertight, we would need to
insert SEH_Epilogue instructions into all basic blocks ending in a call
with no terminators or successors, but in practice this is unlikely to
come up.
llvm-svn: 248959
Summary:
Funclets have been turned into functions by the time they hit the object
file. Make sure that they have decent names for the symbol table and
CFI directives explaining how to reason about their prologues.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13261
llvm-svn: 248824
When AA is being used, non-aliasing stores are canonicalized to use the same
chain, and DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeAndAliasCandidates can take advantage of
this by looking only as users of a store's chain operand. However, user
iteration is not result-number specific, we need to check that the use is as a
chain operand, and not via some other operand. It is certainly possible to have
another potentially-aliasing store, which shares the first's base pointer, and
uses the first's chain's node via some other operand.
Failure to catch this situation caused, at least in the included test case, an
assert later because the relative sequence-number ordering caused later
replacement to create a cycle in the DAG.
llvm-svn: 248698
This is a redo of D7208 ( r227242 - http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=227242 ).
The patch was reverted because an AArch64 target could infinite loop after the change in DAGCombiner
to merge vector stores. That happened because AArch64's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() wasn't telling
the truth. It reported all unaligned memory accesses as fast, but then split some 128-bit unaligned
accesses up in performSTORECombine() because they are slow.
This patch attempts to fix the problem in AArch's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() while preserving
existing (perhaps questionable) lowering behavior.
The x86 test shows that store merging is working as intended for a target with fast 32-byte unaligned
stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12635
llvm-svn: 248622
Fixes the overflow case of llvm.*absdiff intrinsic also updats the tests and LangRef.rst accordingly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11678
llvm-svn: 248483
If the stores are storing values from loads which partially
alias the stores, we could end up placing the merged loads
and stores on the same chain which has the potential to break.
Each store may have a different chain dependency on only some
of the original loads. Create a new TokenFactor to capture all
of the required dependencies of the stores rather than assuming
all stores can use the same chain.
The testcase is a situation where this happens, although
it does not have an observable change from this. The DAG nodes
just happened to not be reordered before despite this missing
chain dependency.
This is based on an off-list report for an out of tree target
which regressed due to r246307 and I haven't managed to find a case
where the nodes do end up reordered with an in tree target.
llvm-svn: 248468
Fixed the issue that when there is an edge from the jump table to the default statement, we should check it directly instead of checking if the sibling of the jump table header is a successor of the jump table header, which may not be the default statment but a successor of it.
llvm-svn: 248354
Artyom Skrobov