Summary:
This revision implements support for the `AddedIncludes` field in
RewriteRule cases; that is, it supports specifying the addition of include
directives in files modified by the clang tidy check.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, gribozavr
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63893
llvm-svn: 364922
Summary:
This revision allows users to specify the insertion of an included directive (at
the top of the file being rewritten) as part of a rewrite rule. These
directives are bundled with `RewriteRule` cases, so that different cases can
potentially result in different include actions.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63892
llvm-svn: 364917
Object/corrupt.test has the same purpose as Object/invalid.test:
it tests the behavior on invalid inputs.
In this patch I converted it to YAML, merged into invalid.test,
added comments and removed a few precompiled binaries.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63927
llvm-svn: 364916
I was actually wondering if there was some nicer way than m_Value()+cast,
but apparently what i was really "subconsciously" thinking about
was correctness issue.
hasNoUnsignedWrap()/hasNoUnsignedWrap() exist for Instruction,
not for BinaryOperator, so let's just use m_Instruction(),
thus both avoiding a cast, and a crash.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42484,
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15587
llvm-svn: 364915
Fixes PR42442
t.o has a STB_GLOBAL undef ref to f
t2.so has a STB_WEAK undef ref to f
t1.so defines f
ld.lld t.o t1.so t2.so currently sets the binding of `f` to STB_WEAK.
This is not correct because there exists a STB_GLOBAL undef ref from a
regular object. The problem is that resolveUndefined() doesn't check
if the undef ref is seen for the first time:
if (isShared() || isLazy() || (isUndefined() && Other.Binding != STB_WEAK))
Binding = Other.Binding;
The isShared() condition should be `isShared() && !Referenced`
where Referenced is set to true after an undef ref is seen.
In practice, when linking a pthread program with glibc:
// a.o
#include <pthread.h>
pthread_mutex_t mu = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
int main() { pthread_mutex_unlock(&mu); }
{clang,gcc} -fuse-ld=lld a.o -lpthread # libpthread.so is linked before libgcc_s.so.1
The weak undef pthread_mutex_unlock in libgcc_s.so.1 makes the result
weak, which diverges from GNU linkers where STB_DEFAULT is used:
23: 0000000000000000 0 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT UND pthread_mutex_lock
(Note, if -pthread is used instead, libpthread.so will be linked **after**
libgcc_s.so.1 . lld sets the binding to the expected STB_GLOBAL)
Similar linking sequences (ld.lld t.o t1.so t2.so) appear to be used by
Go, which cause a build error https://github.com/golang/go/issues/31912.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63974
llvm-svn: 364913
Use '%tu' modifier for pointer arithmetic since we are using C++11
already. Prefer static_cast<> over C-style cast. Remove unnecessary
conversion of result, and add const qualifier to converted pointers,
to silence the following warning:
In file included from /home/mgorny/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:220:0:
/home/mgorny/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc: In function ‘void llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&)’:
/home/mgorny/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:546:53: warning: cast from type ‘const void*’ to type ‘char*’ casts away qualifiers [-Wcast-qual]
(char*)dlinfo.dli_saddr));
^~~~~~~~~
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63888
llvm-svn: 364912
I'm currently working on a GSoC project that aims to improve the the bug reports
of the analyzer. The main heuristic I plan to use is to explain values that are
a control dependency of the bug location better.
01 bool b = messyComputation();
02 int i = 0;
03 if (b) // control dependency of the bug site, let's explain why we assume val
04 // to be true
05 10 / i; // warn: division by zero
Because of this, I'd like to generalize IDFCalculator so that I could use it for
Clang's CFG: D62883.
In detail:
* Rename IDFCalculator to IDFCalculatorBase, make it take a general CFG node
type as a template argument rather then strictly BasicBlock (but preserve
ForwardIDFCalculator and ReverseIDFCalculator)
* Move IDFCalculatorBase from llvm/include/llvm/Analysis to
llvm/include/llvm/Support (but leave the BasicBlock variants in
llvm/include/llvm/Analysis)
* clang-format the file since this patch messes up git blame anyways
* Change typedef to using
* Add the new type ChildrenGetterTy, and store an instance of it in
IDFCalculatorBase. This is important because I'll have to specialize it for
Clang's CFG to filter out nullpointer successors, similarly to D62507.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63389
llvm-svn: 364911
Passing a vector type over the soft-float ABI involves it being split
into four GPRs, so the first thing that has to happen at the start of
the function is to recombine those into a vector register. The ABI
types all vectors as v2f64, so we need to support BUILD_VECTOR for
that type, which I do in this patch by allowing it to be expanded in
terms of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, and writing an ISel pattern for that in
turn. Similarly, I provide a rule for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT so that a
returned vector can be marshalled back into GPRs.
While I'm here, I've also added ISD::UNDEF to the list of operations
we turn back on in `setAllExpand`, because I noticed that otherwise it
gets expanded into a BUILD_VECTOR with explicit zero inputs, leading
to pointless machine instructions to zero out a vector register that's
about to have every lane overwritten of in any case.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63937
llvm-svn: 364910
If you compile with `-mattr=+mve` (enabling integer MVE instructions
but not floating-point ones), then the scalar FP //registers// exist
and it's legal to move things in and out of them, load and store them,
but it's not legal to do arithmetic on them.
In D60708, the calls to `addRegisterClass` in ARMISelLowering that
enable use of the scalar FP registers became conditionalised on
`Subtarget->hasFPRegs()` instead of `Subtarget->hasVFP2Base()`, so
that loads, stores and moves of those registers would work. But I
didn't realise that that would also enable all the operations on those
types by default.
Now, if the target doesn't have basic VFP, we follow up those
`addRegisterClass` calls by turning back off all the nontrivial
operations you can perform on f32 and f64. That causes several
knock-on failures, which are fixed by allowing the `VMOVDcc` and
`VMOVScc` instructions to be selected even if all you have is
`HasFPRegs`, and adjusting several checks for 'is this a double in a
single-precision-only world?' to the more general 'is this any FP type
we can't do arithmetic on?'. Between those, the whole of the
`float-ops.ll` and `fp16-instructions.ll` tests can now run in
MVE-without-FP mode and generate correct-looking code.
One odd side effect is that I had to relax the check lines in that
test so that they permit test functions like `add_f` to be generated
as tailcalls to software FP library functions, instead of ordinary
calls. Doing that is entirely legal, but the mystery is why this is
the first RUN line that's needed the relaxation: on the usual kind of
non-FP target, no tailcalls ever seem to be generated. Going by the
llc messages, I think `SoftenFloatResult` must be perturbing the code
generation in some way, but that's as much as I can guess.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63938
llvm-svn: 364909
I guess the problem is because of endianess of
the bytes tested by "od" tool. I changed the Content
sequence as it does not actually matter.
llvm-svn: 364907
We were relying on combineX86ShufflesRecursively to handle this - this patch gets it done earlier which should make it easier for other code to use resolveTargetShuffleInputsAndMask.
llvm-svn: 364906
Some of our test cases are using objects which
has sections with a broken sh_offset field.
There was no way to set it from YAML until this patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63879
llvm-svn: 364898
This patch removes the part which tried to interpret addresses
in that section as offsets and simplifies the remaining code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64020
llvm-svn: 364896
Removes a vector reference that was added by D62998, since the
preexisting function parameter is sufficient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64044
llvm-svn: 364895
Summary:
Previously, we only collect refs of the symbols which are declared in
the preamble and referenced in the main file, it works well when the
main file is .cpp file.
However, when the main file is .h file (when opening a .h file in the
editor), we don't collect refs of the symbol declared in this file, so we miss
these refs in our dynamic index.
A typical scenario:
1. Open Foo.h (which contains class Foo)
2. Open Foo.cpp, call find references for Foo
And we only get refs from Foo.cpp.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63818
llvm-svn: 364893
I noticed that the instance of OpenFile in sanitizer_solaris.cc is no
longer needed.
Removed as follows, tested on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63764
llvm-svn: 364892
The code for duplicating instructions could sometimes try to emit copies
intended to deal with unconstrainable register classes to the tail block of the
original instruction, rather than before the newly cloned instruction in the
predecessor block.
This was exposed by GlobalISel on arm64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64049
llvm-svn: 364888
After implemented this hook, we will model the memory dependency in the scheduling dependency graph more precise,
and will have more opportunity to reorder the load/stores, as they didn't have the dependency at some condition
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63804
llvm-svn: 364886
For a given floating point load / store pair, if the load value isn't used by any other operations,
then consider transforming the pair to integer load / store operations if the target deems the transformation profitable.
And we can exploiting much more when there are other operation nodes with chain operand between the load/store pair
so long as we keep the chain ordering original. We only replace the register used to load/store from float to integer.
I only add testcase in ARM because the TLI.isDesirableToTransformToIntegerOp hook is only enabled in ARM target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60601
llvm-svn: 364883
They appear to fail to link in various 32-bit configurations for unknown
reasons. This change was already reverted, and it seems preferable to me
to make forward progress and remove this once the problems are fully
understood.
llvm-svn: 364877
Yitzhak Mandelbaum