Summary:
Some coroutine diagnostics need to point to the location of the first coroutine keyword in the function, like when diagnosing a `return` inside a coroutine. Previously we did this by storing each *valid* coroutine statement in a list and select the first one to use in diagnostics. However if every coroutine statement is invalid we would have no location to point to.
This patch fixes the storage of the first coroutine statement location, ensuring that it gets stored even when the resulting AST node would be invalid.
This patch also removes the `CoroutineStmts` list in `FunctionScopeInfo` because it was unused.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30776
llvm-svn: 297547
Summary:
Create only one OpaqueValue for await_ready/await_suspend/await_resume.
Store OpaqueValue used in the CoroutineSuspendExpr node, so that CodeGen does not have to hunt looking for it.
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30775
llvm-svn: 297541
Summary:
This patch adds passing a coroutine_handle object to await_suspend calls.
It builds the coroutine_handle using coroutine_handle<PromiseType>::from_address(__builtin_coro_frame()).
(a revision of https://reviews.llvm.org/D26316 that for some reason refuses to apply via arc patch)
Reviewers: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30769
llvm-svn: 297356
Summary:
The changes contained in this patch are:
1. Defines a new AST node `CoawaitDependentExpr` for representing co_await expressions while the promise type is still dependent.
2. Correctly detect and transform the 'co_await' operand to `p.await_transform(<expr>)` when possible.
3. Change the initial/final suspend points to build during the initial parse, so they have the correct operator co_await lookup results.
4. Fix transformation of the CoroutineBodyStmt so that it doesn't re-build the final/initial suspends.
@rsmith: This change is a little big, but it's not trivial for me to split it up. Please let me know if you would prefer this submitted as multiple patches.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: ABataev, rsmith, mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26057
llvm-svn: 297093
Previously when a coroutine was building the implicit setup/destroy
constructs it would emit diagostics about failures on the first co_await/co_return/co_yield
it encountered. This was confusing because that construct may not itself be ill-formed.
This patch moves the diagnostics to the function start instead.
llvm-svn: 297089
Summary:
Sema::CheckCompletedCoroutineBody was growing unwieldy with building all of the substatements. Also, constructors for CoroutineBodyStmt had way too many parameters.
Instead, CoroutineBodyStmt now defines CtorArgs structure with all of the required construction parameters.
CheckCompleteCoroutineBody delegates construction of individual substatements to short functions one per each substatement.
Also, added a drive-by fix of initializing CoroutinePromise to nullptr in ScopeInfo.h.
And addressed the FIXME that wanted to tail allocate extra room at the end of the CoroutineBodyStmt to hold parameter move expressions. (The comment was longer that the code that implemented tail allocation).
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28835
llvm-svn: 294933
This flag serves no purpose other than to prevent us walking through a type to
check whether it contains an 'auto' specifier; this duplication of information
is error-prone, does not appear to provide any performance benefit, and will
become less practical once we support C++1z deduced class template types and
eventually constrained types from the Concepts TS.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 291737
Summary: The title says it all. Additionally this patch refactors the diagnostic code into a separate function.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25292
llvm-svn: 285331
Summary:
This patch adds semantic checking and building of the fall-through `co_return;` statement as well as the `p.set_exception(std::current_exception())` call for handling uncaught exceptions.
The fall-through statement is built and checked according to:
> [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/4
> The unqualified-ids return_void and return_value are looked up in the scope of class P. If
> both are found, the program is ill-formed. If the unqualified-id return_void is found, flowing
> off the end of a coroutine is equivalent to a co_return with no operand. Otherwise, flowing off
> the end of a coroutine results in undefined behavior.
Similarly the `set_exception` call is only built when that unqualified-id is found in the scope of class P.
Additionally this patch adds fall-through warnings for non-void returning coroutines. Since it's surprising undefined behavior I thought it would be important to add the warning right away.
Reviewers: majnemer, GorNishanov, rsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25349
llvm-svn: 285271
Summary:
Previously the statement `co_return {42}` would be transformed into `P.return_void()`, since the type of `{42}` is represented as `void` by Clang.
This patch fixes the bug by checking for `InitListExpr` arguments and transforming them accordingly.
Reviewers: majnemer, GorNishanov, rsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25296
llvm-svn: 283495
Summary: The title says it all.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25078
llvm-svn: 282973
These ExprWithCleanups are added for holding a RunCleanupsScope not
for destructor calls; rather, they are for lifetime marks. This requires
ExprWithCleanups to keep a bit to indicate whether it have cleanups with
side effects (e.g. dtor calls).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20498
llvm-svn: 272296
Eric Fiselier