gcc has these intrinsics in ia32intrin.h as well. And icc implements them
though they aren't documented in the Intel Intrinsics Guide.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59533
llvm-svn: 356609
allocators.
It is better to deduce omp_allocator_handle_t type from the predefined
allocators, because omp.h header might not define it explicitly. Plus,
it allows to identify the predefined allocators correctly when trying to
build the allcoator for the global variables.
llvm-svn: 356607
Before this commit, we emit unavailable errors for calls to functions during
overload resolution, and for references to all other declarations in
DiagnoseUseOfDecl. The early checks during overload resolution aren't as good as
the DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl based checks, as they error on the code from
PR40991. This commit fixes this by removing the early checking.
llvm.org/PR40991
rdar://48564179
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59394
llvm-svn: 356599
This diff previously exposed a bug in LLVM's IRLinker, breaking
buildbots that tried to self-host LLVM with monolithic LTO.
The bug is now in LLVM by D59552
Original commit message:
As PR17480 describes, clang does not support the used attribute
for member functions of class templates. This means that if the member
function is not used, its definition is never instantiated. This patch
changes clang to emit the definition if it has the used attribute.
Test Plan: Added a testcase
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56928
llvm-svn: 356598
Summary:
`ASTImporter::Imported` currently returns a Decl, but that return value is not used by the ASTImporter (or anywhere else)
nor is it documented.
Reviewers: balazske, martong, a.sidorin, shafik
Reviewed By: balazske, martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59595
llvm-svn: 356592
Summary:
Sometime after 6.0.0 and the current trunk 9.0.0 the following code would be considered as objective C and not C++
Reported by: https://twitter.com/mattgodbolt/status/1096188576503644160
$ clang-format.exe test.h
Configuration file(s) do(es) not support Objective-C: C:\clang\build\.clang-format
--- test.h --
```
std::vector<std::pair<std::string,std::string>> C;
void foo()
{
for (auto && [A,B] : C)
{
std::string D = A + B;
}
}
```
The following code fixes this issue of incorrect detection
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, JonasToth, reuk
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59546
llvm-svn: 356575
Summary:
[OpenCL] Generate 'unroll.enable' metadata for __attribute__((opencl_unroll_hint))
For both !{!"llvm.loop.unroll.enable"} and !{!"llvm.loop.unroll.full"} the unroller
will try to fully unroll a loop unless the trip count is not known at compile time.
In that case for '.full' metadata no unrolling will be processed, while for '.enable'
the loop will be partially unrolled with a heuristically chosen unroll factor.
See: docs/LanguageExtensions.rst
From https://www.khronos.org/registry/OpenCL/sdk/2.0/docs/man/xhtml/attributes-loopUnroll.html
__attribute__((opencl_unroll_hint))
for (int i=0; i<2; i++)
{
...
}
In the example above, the compiler will determine how much to unroll the loop.
Before the patch for __attribute__((opencl_unroll_hint)) was generated metadata
!{!"llvm.loop.unroll.full"}, which limits ability of loop unroller to decide, how
much to unroll the loop.
Reviewers: Anastasia, yaxunl
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: zzheng, dmgreen, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, asavonic, AlexeySotkin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59493
llvm-svn: 356571
Summary:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf, page 3:
```
structured block
For C/C++, an executable statement, possibly compound, with a single entry at the
top and a single exit at the bottom, or an OpenMP construct.
COMMENT: See Section 2.1 on page 38 for restrictions on structured
blocks.
```
```
2.1 Directive Format
Some executable directives include a structured block. A structured block:
• may contain infinite loops where the point of exit is never reached;
• may halt due to an IEEE exception;
• may contain calls to exit(), _Exit(), quick_exit(), abort() or functions with a
_Noreturn specifier (in C) or a noreturn attribute (in C/C++);
• may be an expression statement, iteration statement, selection statement, or try block, provided
that the corresponding compound statement obtained by enclosing it in { and } would be a
structured block; and
Restrictions
Restrictions to structured blocks are as follows:
• Entry to a structured block must not be the result of a branch.
• The point of exit cannot be a branch out of the structured block.
C / C++
• The point of entry to a structured block must not be a call to setjmp().
• longjmp() and throw() must not violate the entry/exit criteria.
```
Of particular note here is the fact that OpenMP structured blocks are as-if `noexcept`,
in the same sense as with the normal `noexcept` functions in C++.
I.e. if throw happens, and it attempts to travel out of the `noexcept` function
(here: out of the current structured-block), then the program terminates.
Now, one of course can say that since it is explicitly prohibited by the Specification,
then any and all programs that violate this Specification contain undefined behavior,
and are unspecified, and thus no one should care about them. Just don't write broken code /s
But i'm not sure this is a reasonable approach.
I have personally had oss-fuzz issues of this origin - exception thrown inside
of an OpenMP structured-block that is not caught, thus causing program termination.
This issue isn't all that hard to catch, it's not any particularly different from
diagnosing the same situation with the normal `noexcept` function.
Now, clang static analyzer does not presently model exceptions.
But clang-tidy has a simplisic [[ https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]] check,
and it is even refactored as a `ExceptionAnalyzer` class for reuse.
So it would be trivial to use that analyzer to check for
exceptions escaping out of OpenMP structured blocks. (D59466)
All that sounds too great to be true. Indeed, there is a caveat.
Presently, it's practically impossible to do. To check a OpenMP structured block
you need to somehow 'get' the OpenMP structured block, and you can't because
it's simply not modelled in AST. `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` is not it's representation.
Now, it is of course possible to write e.g. some AST matcher that would e.g.
match every OpenMP executable directive, and then return the whatever `Stmt` is
the structured block of said executable directive, if any.
But i said //practically//. This isn't practical for the following reasons:
1. This **will** bitrot. That matcher will need to be kept up-to-date,
and refreshed with every new OpenMP spec version.
2. Every single piece of code that would want that knowledge would need to
have such matcher. Well, okay, if it is an AST matcher, it could be shared.
But then you still have `RecursiveASTVisitor` and friends.
`2 > 1`, so now you have code duplication.
So it would be reasonable (and is fully within clang AST spirit) to not
force every single consumer to do that work, but instead store that knowledge
in the correct, and appropriate place - AST, class structure.
Now, there is another hoop we need to get through.
It isn't fully obvious //how// to model this.
The best solution would of course be to simply add a `OMPStructuredBlock` transparent
node. It would be optimal, it would give us two properties:
* Given this `OMPExecutableDirective`, what's it OpenMP structured block?
* It is trivial to check whether the `Stmt*` is a OpenMP structured block (`isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`)
But OpenMP structured block isn't **necessarily** the first, direct child of `OMP*Directive`.
(even ignoring the clang's `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` that were inserted inbetween).
So i'm not sure whether or not we could re-create AST statements after they were already created?
There would be other costs to a new AST node: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c12
```
1. You will need to break the representation of loops. The body should be replaced by the "structured block" entity.
2. You will need to support serialization/deserialization.
3. You will need to support template instantiation.
4. You will need to support codegen and take this new construct to account in each OpenMP directive.
```
Instead, there **is** an functionally-equivalent, alternative solution, consisting of two parts.
Part 1:
* Add a member function `isStandaloneDirective()` to the `OMPExecutableDirective` class,
that will tell whether this directive is stand-alone or not, as per the spec.
We need it because we can't just check for the existance of associated statements,
see code comment.
* Add a member function `getStructuredBlock()` to the OMPExecutableDirective` class itself,
that assert that this is not a stand-alone directive, and either return the correct loop body
if this is a loop-like directive, or the captured statement.
This way, given an `OMPExecutableDirective`, we can get it's structured block.
Also, since the knowledge is ingrained into the clang OpenMP implementation,
it will not cause any duplication, and //hopefully// won't bitrot.
Great we achieved 1 of 2 properties of `OMPStructuredBlock` approach.
Thus, there is a second part needed:
* How can we check whether a given `Stmt*` is `OMPStructuredBlock`?
Well, we can't really, in general. I can see this workaround:
```
class FunctionASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor> {
using Base = RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor>;
public:
bool VisitOMPExecDir(OMPExecDir *D) {
OmpStructuredStmts.emplace_back(D.getStructuredStmt());
}
bool VisitSOMETHINGELSE(???) {
if(InOmpStructuredStmt)
HI!
}
bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Node) {
if (!Node)
return Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node)
++InOmpStructuredStmt;
Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) {
OmpStructuredStmts.pop_back();
--InOmpStructuredStmt;
}
return true;
}
std::vector<Stmt*> OmpStructuredStmts;
int InOmpStructuredStmt = 0;
};
```
But i really don't see using it in practice.
It's just too intrusive; and again, requires knowledge duplication.
.. but no. The solution lies right on the ground.
Why don't we simply store this `i'm a openmp structured block` in the bitfield of the `Stmt` itself?
This does not appear to have any impact on the memory footprint of the clang AST,
since it's just a single extra bit in the bitfield. At least the static assertions don't fail.
Thus, indeed, we can achieve both of the properties without a new AST node.
We can cheaply set that bit right in sema, at the end of `Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective()`,
by just calling the `getStructuredBlock()` that we just added.
Test coverage that demonstrates all this has been added.
This isn't as great with serialization though. Most of it does not use abbrevs,
so we do end up paying the full price (4 bytes?) instead of a single bit.
That price, of course, can be reclaimed by using abbrevs.
In fact, i suspect that //might// not just reclaim these bytes, but pack these PCH significantly.
I'm not seeing a third solution. If there is one, it would be interesting to hear about it.
("just don't write code that would require `isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`" is not a solution.)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563 | PR40563 ]].
Reviewers: ABataev, rjmccall, hfinkel, rsmith, riccibruno, gribozavr
Reviewed By: ABataev, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, steveire, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214
llvm-svn: 356570
Summary:
The ASTNodeImporter::ImportTemplateParameterList is replaced by a
template specialization of 'import' that already exists and does
(almost) the same thing.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59134
llvm-svn: 356564
PentiumPro has HasNOPL set in the backend. i686 does not.
Despite having a function that looks like it canonicalizes alias names. It
doesn't seem to be called. So I don't think this is a functional change. But its
good to be consistent between the backend and frontend.
llvm-svn: 356537
Use the new kind for both angled header-name tokens and for
double-quoted header-name tokens.
This is in preparation for C++20's context-sensitive header-name token
formation rules.
llvm-svn: 356530
The attribute pass_dynamic_object_size(n) behaves exactly like
pass_object_size(n), but instead of evaluating __builtin_object_size on calls,
it evaluates __builtin_dynamic_object_size, which has the potential to produce
runtime code when the object size can't be determined statically.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58757
llvm-svn: 356515
If the allocator was specified for the variable and next one is found
with the different allocator, the warning is emitted, and the allocator
is ignored.
llvm-svn: 356513
"clang++ hello.cc --rtlib=compiler-rt"
now can works without specifying additional unwind or exception
handling libraries.
This reworked version of the feature no longer modifies today's default
unwind library for compiler-rt: which is nothing. Rather, a user
can specify -DCLANG_DEFAULT_UNWINDLIB=libunwind when configuring
the compiler.
This should address the issues from the previous version.
Update tests for new --unwindlib semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59109
llvm-svn: 356508
According to OpenMP, 2.11.3 allocate Directive, Restrictions, C / C++,
if a list item has a static storage type, the allocator expression in
the allocator clause must be a constant expression that evaluates to
one of the predefined memory allocator values. Added check for this
restriction.
llvm-svn: 356496
When we create overloads for the builtin compound assignment operators
we need to preserve address space for the reference operand taking it
from the argument that is passed in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59367
llvm-svn: 356475
Added initial codegen for the local variables with the #pragma omp
allocate directive. Instead of allocating the variables on the stack,
__kmpc_alloc|__kmpc_free functions are used for memory (de-)allocation.
llvm-svn: 356472
Summary:
Redecl chains of function template specializations are not handled well
currently. We want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to
keep the structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is
to not squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and
put them in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58668
llvm-svn: 356455
Summary:
Redecl chains of class template specializations are not handled well
currently. We want to handle them similarly to functions, i.e. try to
keep the structure of the original AST as much as possible. The aim is
to not squash a prototype with a definition, rather we create both and
put them in a redecl chain.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58673
llvm-svn: 356452
Addresses PR40999 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40999
Private fields and methods in JavaScript would get incorrectly indented
(it sees them as preprocessor directives and hence left aligns them)
In this revision `#identifier` tokens `tok::hash->tok::identifier` are
merged into a single new token `tok::identifier` with the `#` contained
inside the TokenText.
Before:
```
class Example {
pub = 1;
static pub2 = "foo";
static #priv2 = "bar";
method() { this.#priv = 5; }
static staticMethod() {
switch (this.#priv) {
case '1':
break;
}
}
this.#privateMethod(); // infinite loop
}
static #staticPrivateMethod() {}
}
```
After this fix the code will be correctly indented
```
class Example {
pub = 1;
#priv = 2;
static pub2 = "foo";
static #priv2 = "bar";
method() { this.#priv = 5; }
static staticMethod() {
switch (this.#priv) {
case '1':
#priv = 3;
break;
}
}
#privateMethod() {
this.#privateMethod(); // infinite loop
}
static #staticPrivateMethod() {}
}
```
NOTE: There might be some JavaScript code out there which uses the C
processor to preprocess .js files
http://www.nongnu.org/espresso/js-cpp.html. It's not clear how this
revision or even private fields and methods would interact.
Patch originally by MyDeveloperDays (thanks!).
llvm-svn: 356449
Before:
const x = veryLongIdentifier
`hello`;
After:
const x =
veryLongIdentifier`hello`;
While it's allowed to have the template string and tag identifier
separated by a line break, currently the clang-format output is not
stable when a break is forced. Additionally, disallowing a line break
makes it clear that the identifier is actually a tag for a template
string.
Patch originally by mitchellwills (thanks!).
llvm-svn: 356447
Summary:
Previously, when the renamed spelling is ambiguous, we simply use the
full-qualfied name (with leading "::"). This patch makes it try adding
additional specifiers one at a time until name is no longer ambiguous,
which allows us to find better disambuguated spelling.
Reviewers: kadircet, gribozavr
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59487
llvm-svn: 356446
Summary:
This patch refactors several instances of cast<> used in if
conditionals. Since cast<> asserts on failure, the else branch can
never be taken.
In some cases, the fix is to replace cast<> with dyn_cast<>. While
others required the removal of the conditional and some minor
refactoring.
A discussion can be seen here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190318/265044.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59529
llvm-svn: 356441
tokens.
We now actually form an angled_string_literal token for a header name by
concatenation rather than just working out what its contents would be.
This substantially simplifies downstream processing and is necessary for
C++20 header unit imports.
llvm-svn: 356433
Summary:
Similar to D56967, we add the existing diag::note_locked_here to tell
the user where we saw the locking that isn't matched correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59455
llvm-svn: 356427
As background, when constructing a complete object, virtual bases are
constructed first. If an exception is thrown later in the ctor, those
virtual bases are destroyed, so sema marks the relevant constructors and
destructors of virtual bases as referenced. If necessary, they are
emitted.
However, an abstract class can never be used to construct a complete
object. In the Itanium C++ ABI, this works out nicely, because we never
end up emitting the "complete" constructor variant, only the "base"
constructor variant, which can be called by constructors of derived
classes. Clang's Sema::MarkBaseAndMemberDestructorsReferenced is aware
of this optimization, and it does not mark ctors and dtors of virtual
bases referenced when the constructor of an abstract class is emitted.
In the Microsoft ABI, there are no complete/base variants, so before
this change, the constructor of an abstract class could reference ctors
and dtors of a virtual base without marking them referenced. This could
lead to unresolved symbol errors at link time, as reported in PR41065.
The fix is to implement the same optimization as Sema: If the class is
abstract, don't bother initializing its virtual bases. The "is this
class the most derived class" check in the constructor will never pass,
and the virtual base constructor calls are always dead. Skip them.
I think Richard noticed this missed optimization back in 2016 when he
was implementing inheriting constructors. I wasn't able to find any bugs
or email about it, though.
Fixes PR41065
llvm-svn: 356425
This is another attempt at what Erich Keane tried to do in r355322.
This adds rolb, rolw, rold, rolq and their ror equivalent as always_inline wrappers around __builtin_rotate* which will lower to funnel shift intrinsics in IR.
Additionally, when _MSC_VER is not defined we will define _rotl, _lrotl, _rotr, _lrotr as macros to one of the always_inline intrinsics mentioned above. Making sure that _lrotl/_lrotr use either 32 or 64 bit based on the size of long. These need to be macros because we have builtins with the same name for MS compatibility, but _MSC_VER isn't always defined when those builtins are enabled.
We also define _rotwl and _rotwr as macros aliasing to rolw/rorw just like gcc to complete the set. These don't need to be gated with _MSC_VER because these aren't MS builtins.
I've added tests both for non-MS and -ms-extensions with and without _MSC_VER being defined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59346
llvm-svn: 356423
These diagnose overflowing calls to subset of fortifiable functions. Some
functions, like sprintf or strcpy aren't supported right not, but we should
probably support these in the future. We previously supported this kind of
functionality with -Wbuiltin-memcpy-chk-size, but that diagnostic doesn't work
with _FORTIFY implementations that use wrapper functions. Also unlike that
diagnostic, we emit these warnings regardless of whether _FORTIFY_SOURCE is
actually enabled, which is nice for programs that don't enable the runtime
checks.
Why not just use diagnose_if, like Bionic does? We can get better diagnostics in
the compiler (i.e. mention the sizes), and we have the potential to diagnose
sprintf and strcpy which is impossible with diagnose_if (at least, in languages
that don't support C++14 constexpr). This approach also saves standard libraries
from having to add diagnose_if.
rdar://48006655
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58797
llvm-svn: 356397
Summary:
If the constraint information is not changed between two program states the
analyzer has not learnt new information and made no report. But it is
possible to happen because we have no information at all. The new approach
evaluates the condition to determine if that is the case and let the user
know we just `Assuming...` some value.
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: llvm-commits, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin,
mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gsd, gerazo
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57410
llvm-svn: 356323
Summary:
Removed the `GDM` checking what could prevent reports made by this visitor.
Now we rely on constraint changes instead.
(It reapplies 356318 with a feature from 356319 because build-bot failure.)
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jdoerfert, gerazo, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware,
szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54811
llvm-svn: 356322
Summary: If the constraint information is not changed between two program states the analyzer has not learnt new information and made no report. But it is possible to happen because we have no information at all. The new approach evaluates the condition to determine if that is the case and let the user know we just 'Assuming...' some value.
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gsd, gerazo
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57410
llvm-svn: 356319
Summary: Removed the `GDM` checking what could prevent reports made by this visitor. Now we rely on constraint changes instead.
Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: jdoerfert, gerazo, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54811
llvm-svn: 356318
Summary:
Because in wasm we merge all catch clauses into one big catchpad, in
case none of the types in catch handlers matches after we test against
each of them, we should unwind to the next EH enclosing scope. For this,
we should NOT use a call to `__cxa_rethrow` but rather a call to our own
rethrow intrinsic, because what we're trying to do here is just to
transfer the control flow into the next enclosing EH pad (or the
caller). Calls to `__cxa_rethrow` should only be used after a call to
`__cxa_begin_catch`.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59353
llvm-svn: 356317
Partial fix for the clang Bug 38811 "Clang fails to compile with CUDA-9.x on Windows".
[Synopsis]
__sptr is a new Microsoft specific modifier (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/sptr-uptr?view=vs-2017).
[Solution]
Replace all `__sptr` occurrences with `__s` (and all `__cptr` with `__c` as well) to eliminate the below clang compilation error on Windows.
In file included from C:\GIT\LLVM\trunk\llvm-64-release-vs2017-15.9.5\dist\lib\clang\9.0.0\include\__clang_cuda_runtime_wrapper.h:162:
C:\GIT\LLVM\trunk\llvm-64-release-vs2017-15.9.5\dist\lib\clang\9.0.0\include\__clang_cuda_device_functions.h:524:33: error: expected expression
return __nv_fast_sincosf(__a, __sptr, __cptr);
^
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D59423
llvm-svn: 356291
Change the HIP Toolchain to pass the OPT_mllvm options into OPT and LLC stages. Added a lit test to verify the command args.
Reviewers: yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59316
llvm-svn: 356277
Craig Topper