When one of the inputs is a wrapping range, intersect with the
union of the two inputs. The union of the two inputs corresponds
to the result we would get if we treated the min/max as a simple
select.
This fixes PR48643.
We don't need any special handling for wrapping ranges (or empty
ranges for that matter). The sub() call will already compute a
correct and precise range.
We only need to adjust the test expectation: We're now computing
an optimal result, rather than an unsigned envelope.
When the optimality check fails, print the inputs, the computed
range and the better range that was found. This makes it much
simpler to identify the cause of the failure.
Make sure that full ranges (which, unlikely all the other cases,
have multiple ways to construct them that all result in the same
range) only print one message by handling them separately.
The current infrastructure for exhaustive ConstantRange testing is
somewhat confusing in what exactly it tests and currently cannot even
be used for operations that produce smallest-size results, rather than
signed/unsigned envelopes.
This patch makes the testing more principled by collecting the exact
set of results of an operation into a bit set and then comparing it
against the range approximation by:
* Checking conservative correctness: All elements in the set must be
in the range.
* Checking optimality under a given preference function: None of the
(slack-free) ranges that can be constructed from the set are
preferred over the computed range.
Implemented preference functions are:
* PreferSmallest: Smallest range regardless of signed/unsigned wrapping
behavior. Probably what we would call "optimal" without further
qualification.
* PreferSmallestUnsigned/Signed: Smallest range that has no
unsigned/signed wrapping. We use this if our calculation is precise
only up to signed/unsigned envelope.
* PreferSmallestNonFullUnsigned/Signed: Smallest range that has no
unsigned/signed wrapping -- but preferring a smaller wrapping range
over a (non-wrapping) full range. We use this if we have a fully
precise calculation but apply a sign preference to the result
(union/intersection). Even with a sign preference, returning a
wrapping range is still "strictly better" than returning a full one.
This also addresses PR49273 by replacing the fragile manual range
construction logic in testBinarySetOperationExhaustive() with generic
code that isn't specialized to the particular form of ranges that set
operations can produces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88356
To set non-default rounding mode user usually calls function 'fesetround'
from standard C library. This way has some disadvantages.
* It creates unnecessary dependency on libc. On the other hand, setting
rounding mode requires few instructions and could be made by compiler.
Sometimes standard C library even is not available, like in the case of
GPU or AI cores that execute small kernels.
* Compiler could generate more effective code if it knows that a particular
call just sets rounding mode.
This change introduces new IR intrinsic, namely 'llvm.set.rounding', which
sets current rounding mode, similar to 'fesetround'. It however differs
from the latter, because it is a lower level facility:
* 'llvm.set.rounding' does not return any value, whereas 'fesetround'
returns non-zero value in the case of failure. In glibc 'fesetround'
reports failure if its argument is invalid or unsupported or if floating
point operations are unavailable on the hardware. Compiler usually knows
what core it generates code for and it can validate arguments in many
cases.
* Rounding mode is specified in 'fesetround' using constants like
'FE_TONEAREST', which are target dependent. It is inconvenient to work
with such constants at IR level.
C standard provides a target-independent way to specify rounding mode, it
is used in FLT_ROUNDS, however it does not define standard way to set
rounding mode using this encoding.
This change implements only IR intrinsic. Lowering it to machine code is
target-specific and will be implemented latter. Mapping of 'fesetround'
to 'llvm.set.rounding' is also not implemented here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74729
This patch
- Adds containsPoisonElement that checks existence of poison in constant vector elements,
- Renames containsUndefElement to containsUndefOrPoisonElement to clarify its behavior & updates its uses properly
With this patch, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison's tests w.r.t constant vectors are added because its analysis is improved.
Thanks!
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94053
As mentioned in D93793, there are quite a few places where unary `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Mask)` can be used
instead of `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Undef, Mask)`.
Let's update them.
Actually, it would have been more natural if the patches were made in this order:
(1) let them use unary CreateShuffleVector first
(2) update IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector to use poison as a placeholder value (D93793)
The order is swapped, but in terms of correctness it is still fine.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93923
The main change is to add a 'IsDecl' field to DIModule so
that when IsDecl is set to true, the debug info entry generated
for the module would be marked as a declaration. That way, the debugger
would look up the definition of the module in the gloabl scope.
Please see the comments in llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dimodule.ll
for what the debug info entries would look like.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93462
Per http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_loopnest, the goal of this
patch (and other following patches) is to create facilities that allow
implementing loop nest passes that run on top-level loop nests for the
New Pass Manager.
This patch extends the functionality of LoopPassManager to handle
loop-nest passes by specializing the definition of LoopPassManager that
accepts both kinds of passes in addPass.
Only loop passes are executed if L is not a top-level one, and both
kinds of passes are executed if L is top-level. Currently, loop nest
passes should have the following run method:
PreservedAnalyses run(LoopNest &, LoopAnalysisManager &,
LoopStandardAnalysisResults &, LPMUpdater &);
Reviewed By: Whitney, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87045
This makes it slightly easier to deal with custom attributes and
CallBase already provides hasFnAttr versions that support both AttrKind
and StringRef arguments in a similar fashion.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92567
phi-empty.ll does not pass under the new PM because the NPM runs
-loop-simplify. Running -loop-simplify ends up not reproing
https://llvm.org/PR48296.
Verified that this test fails when 9eb2c011 is reverted.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92807
It was removed back in 2013 (f63dfbb) by Matt Arsenault but then
reverted since DragonEgg used it, but that project is no longer
maintained.
Reviewed By: ldionne, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92571
Shuffle mask for concat can't be expressed for scalable vectors, so we
should bail out. A test has been added that previously crashed, also
tested isIdentityWithPadding and isIdentityWithExtract where we already
bail out.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92475
Since the length of the llvm::SmallVector shufflemask is related to the
minimum number of elements in a scalable vector, it is fine to just get
the Min field of the ElementCount. This is already done for the similar
function changesLength, tests have been added for both.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92472
It's not possible to express an extract subvector shuffle mask for
a scalable vector.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92312
Revert "Delete llvm::is_trivially_copyable and CMake variable HAVE_STD_IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE"
This reverts commit 4d4bd40b57.
This reverts commit 557b00e0af.
Typically branch_weights are i32, not i64.
This fixes entry_counts_cold.ll under NPM.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90539
This is similar to the existing alloca and program address spaces (D37052)
and should be used when creating/accessing global variables.
We need this in our CHERI fork of LLVM to place all globals in address space 200.
This ensures that values are accessed using CHERI load/store instructions
instead of the normal MIPS/RISC-V ones.
The problem this is trying to fix is that most of the time the type of
globals is created using a simple PointerType::getUnqual() (or ::get() with
the default address-space value of 0). This does not work for us and we get
assertion/compilation/instruction selection failures whenever a new call
is added that uses the default value of zero.
In our fork we have removed the default parameter value of zero for most
address space arguments and use DL.getProgramAddressSpace() or
DL.getGlobalsAddressSpace() whenever possible. If this change is accepted,
I will upstream follow-up patches to use DL.getGlobalsAddressSpace() instead
of relying on the default value of 0 for PointerType::get(), etc.
This patch and the follow-up changes will not have any functional changes
for existing backends with the default globals address space of zero.
A follow-up commit will change the default globals address space for
AMDGPU to 1.
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70947
The design of the PreservedCFG Checker (landed with the commit
28012e00d8) has a fundamental flaw which makes it incorrect.
The checker is based on the PreservedAnalyses result returned
by functional passes: if CFGAnalyses is in the returned
PreservedAnalyses set, then the checker asserts that the CFG
snapshot saved before the pass is equal to the CFG snapshot
taken after the the pass. The problem is in passes that change
CFG and invalidate CFGAnalyses on their own. Such passes do not
return CFGanalyses in the returned PreservedAnalyses. So the
checker mistakenly expects CFG unchanged. As an example see the
class TestSimplifyCFGInvalidatingAnalysisPass in the new tests.
It is interesting that the bug was not found in LLVM. That is
because the CFG checker ran only if CFGAnalyses was checked
incorrectly:
if (!PassPA.allAnalysesInSetPreserved<CFGAnalyses>())
return;
but must be checked as follows:
auto PAC = PA.getChecker<PreservedCFGCheckerAnalysis>();
if (!(PAC.preserved() ||
PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<Function>>() ||
PAC.preservedSet<CFGAnalyses>())
return;
A fully redesigned checker will be sent as a separate follow-up
patch.
Reviewed By: Serguei Katkov, Jakub Kuderski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91324
This patch adds a new matcher for single index InsertValue instructions,
similar to the existing matcher for ExtractValue.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91352
This allows those instrumentation to log when they decide to skip a
pass. This provides extra helpful info for optnone functions and also
will help with opt-bisect.
Have OptNoneInstrumentation print when it skips due to seeing optnone.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90545
Make DebugLogging a member variable so that users of PassBuilder don't
need to pass it around so much.
Move call to TargetMachine::registerPassBuilderCallbacks() within
PassBuilder so users don't need to remember to call it.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90437
The support of a few debug info attributes specifically for Fortran
arrays have been added to LLVM recently, but there's no way to take
advantage of them through DIBuilder. This patch extends
DIBuilder::createArrayType to enable the settings of those attributes.
Patch by Chih-Ping Chen!
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90323
This is needed to support fortran assumed rank arrays which
have runtime rank.
Summary:
Fortran assumed rank arrays have dynamic rank. DWARF TAG
DW_TAG_generic_subrange is needed to support that.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89218
The support of a few debug info attributes specifically for Fortran
arrays have been added to LLVM recently, but there's no way to take
advantage of them through DIBuilder. This patch extends
DIBuilder::createArrayType to enable the settings of those attributes.
Patch by Chih-Ping Chen!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89817
This adds matchers m_NonNaN, m_NonInf, m_Finite and m_NonZeroFP as well
as generic support for binding the matched value to an APFloat.
I tried to follow the existing convention of using an FP suffix for
predicates like zero and non-zero, which could be confused with the
integer versions, but not for predicates which are clearly already
FP-specific.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89038
Non-instruction defs like arguments, constants or global values
always dominate all instructions/uses inside the function. This
case currently needs to be treated separately by the caller, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89623#inline-832818 for an example.
This patch makes the dominator tree APIs accept a Value instead of
an Instruction and always returns true for the non-Instruction case.
A complication here is that BasicBlocks are also Values. For that
reason we can't support the dominates(Value *, BasicBlock *)
variant, as it would conflict with dominates(BasicBlock *, BasicBlock *),
which has different semantics. For the other two APIs we assert
that the passed value is not a BasicBlock.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89632
The EXPECT_XY comparison functions all rely upon using the existing
TypeSize comparison operators, which we are deprecating in favour
of isKnownXY. I've changed all such cases to compare either the known
minimum size or the fixed size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89531
This patch adds support for DWARF attribute DW_AT_rank.
Summary:
Fortran assumed rank arrays have dynamic rank. DWARF attribute
DW_AT_rank is needed to support that.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89141
This removes "VerifyEachPass" parameters from a lot of functions which is nice.
Don't verify after special passes or VerifierPass.
This introduces verification on loop and cgscc passes, verifying the corresponding function/module.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88764
After some recent upstream discussion we decided that it was best
to avoid having the / operator for both ElementCount and TypeSize,
since this could give the impression that these classes can be used
in the same way as basic integer integer types. However, division
for scalable types is a bit odd because we are only dividing the
minimum quantity by a value, as opposed to something like:
(MinSize * Vscale) / SomeValue
This is why when performing division it's important the caller
first establishes whether the operation makes sense, perhaps by
calling isKnownMultipleOf() prior to division. The caller must now
explictly call divideCoefficientBy() on the class to perform the
operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87700
Introduce a helper which can be used to update the debug location of an
Instruction after the instruction is hoisted. This can be used to safely
drop a source location as recommended by the docs.
For more context, see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85670
I have long complained that while we have exhaustive tests
for ConstantRange, they are, uh, not good.
The approach of groking our own constant range
via exhaustive enumeration is, mysterious.
It neither tells us without doubt that the result is
conservatively correct, nor the precise match to the ConstantRange
result tells us that the result is precise.
But yeah, it's fast, i give it that.
In short, there are three things that we need to check:
1. That ConstantRange result is conservatively correct
2. That ConstantRange range is reasonable
3. That ConstantRange result is reasonably precise
So let's not just check the middle one, but all three.
This provides precision test coverage for D88178.
Nikita Popov