This patch adds support for optional memory profile information to be
included with and indexed profile. The indexed profile header adds a new
field which points to the offset of the memory profile section (if
present) in the indexed profile. For users who do not utilize this
feature the only overhead is a 64-bit offset in the header.
The memory profile section contains (1) profile metadata describing the
information recorded for each entry (2) an on-disk hashtable containing
the profile records indexed via llvm::md5(function_name). We chose to
introduce a separate hash table instead of the existing one since the
indexing for the instrumented fdo hash table is based on a CFG hash
which itself is perturbed by memprof instrumentation.
This commit also includes the changes reviewed separately in D120093.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120103
TLS teardown is currently broken, as we unpoison the shadow a little bit
and to the right of the TLS section, rather than the full TLS section
itself. This currently breaks at -O0, and breaks with some upcoming
globals code that I have.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120080
This reverts commit 85355a560a.
This patch adds support for optional memory profile information to be
included with and indexed profile. The indexed profile header adds a new
field which points to the offset of the memory profile section (if
present) in the indexed profile. For users who do not utilize this
feature the only overhead is a 64-bit offset in the header.
The memory profile section contains (1) profile metadata describing the
information recorded for each entry (2) an on-disk hashtable containing
the profile records indexed via llvm::md5(function_name). We chose to
introduce a separate hash table instead of the existing one since the
indexing for the instrumented fdo hash table is based on a CFG hash
which itself is perturbed by memprof instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118653
Turns out the test was working by accident: we need to ensure
TSan instrumentation is not called from the fork() hook, otherwise the
tool will deadlock. Previously it worked because alloc_free_blocks() got
inlined into __tsan_test_only_on_fork(), but it cannot always be the
case.
Adding __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) will prevent
TSan from instrumenting alloc_free_blocks().
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120050
This reverts commit 910a642c0a.
There are serious correctness issues with the current approach: __sync_*
routines which are not actually atomic should not be enabled by default.
I'll continue discussion on the review.
ARMv5 and older architectures don’t support SMP and do not have atomic instructions. Still they’re in use in IoT world, where one has to stick to libgcc.
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116088
Note: the term "libgcc" refers to the all of `libgcc.a`, `libgcc_eh.a`,
and `libgcc_s.so`.
Enabling libunwind as a replacement for libgcc on Linux has proven to be
challenging since libgcc_s.so is a required dependency in the [Linux
standard base][5]. Some software is transitively dependent on libgcc
because glibc makes hardcoded calls to functions in libgcc_s. For example,
the function `__GI___backtrace` eventually makes its way to a [hardcoded
dlopen to libgcc_s' _Unwind_Backtrace][1]. Since libgcc_{eh.a,s.so} and
libunwind have the same ABI, but different implementations, the two
libraries end up [cross-talking, which ultimately results in a
segfault][2].
To solve this problem, libunwind needs to build a “libgcc”. That is, link
the necessary functions from compiler-rt and libunwind into an archive
and shared object that advertise themselves as `libgcc.a`, `libgcc_eh.a`,
and `libgcc_s.so`, so that glibc’s baked calls are diverted to the
correct objects in memory. Fortunately for us, compiler-rt and libunwind
use the same ABI as the libgcc family, so the problem is solvable at the
llvm-project configuration level: no program source needs to be edited.
Thus, the end result is for a user to configure their LLVM build with a
flag that indicates they want to archive compiler-rt/unwind as libgcc.
We achieve this by compiling libunwind with all the symbols necessary
for compiler-rt to emulate the libgcc family, and then generate symlinks
named for our "libgcc" that point to their corresponding libunwind
counterparts.
We alternatively considered patching glibc so that the source doesn't
directly refer to libgcc, but rather _defaults_ to libgcc, so that a
system preferring compiler-rt/libunwind can point to these libraries
at the config stage instead. Even if we modified the Linux standard
base, this alternative won't work because binaries that are built using
libgcc will still end up having crosstalk between the differing
implementations.
This problem has been solved in this manner for [FreeBSD][3], and this
CL has been tested against [Chrome OS][4].
[1]: https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/master/sysdeps/arm/backtrace.c#L68
[2]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1162190#c16
[3]: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/tree/main/lib/libgcc_s
[4]: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/2945947
[5]: https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_5.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/libgcc-s.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108416
This reverts commit e6999040f5.
Update test to fix signed int comparison warning, fix whitespace in
compiler-rt MIBEntryDef.inc file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117256
This reverts commit 857ec0d01f.
Fixes -DLLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On build by adding the new textual
header to the modulemap file.
Reviewed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D117722
This reverts commit 0f73fb18ca.
Use llvm/Profile/MIBEntryDef.inc instead of relative path.
Generated the raw profile data with `-mllvm
-enable-name-compression=false` so that builbots where the reader is
built without zlib do not fail.
Also updated the test build instructions.
This patch adds support for optional memory profile information to be
included with and indexed profile. The indexed profile header adds a new
field which points to the offset of the memory profile section (if
present) in the indexed profile. For users who do not utilize this
feature the only overhead is a 64-bit offset in the header.
The memory profile section contains (1) profile metadata describing the
information recorded for each entry (2) an on-disk hashtable containing
the profile records indexed via llvm::md5(function_name). We chose to
introduce a separate hash table instead of the existing one since the
indexing for the instrumented fdo hash table is based on a CFG hash
which itself is perturbed by memprof instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118653
This patch refactors out the MemInfoBlock definition into a macro based
header which can be included to generate enums, structus and code for
each field recorded by the memprof profiling runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117722
Third attempt to fix a bot failure from
634da7a1c6 on an Android bot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/77/builds/14339
My last attempt used an approach from another test where chmod was not
working of using a bad character in the path name. But it looks like
this trick only works on Windows.
Instead, restore the original version of this test before my change at
634da7a1c6 and move the bad path test to
a new test file, marking it unsupported on Android.
Attempts to fix a bot failure from
634da7a1c6 on an Android bot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/77/builds/14339
It appears that the chmod is not making the directory unwritable as
expected on this system for some reason. Adopt an approach used in
compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/fuzzer-dirs.test for systems with
non-functioning chmod by including illegal characters in directory.
Add a DirExists mechanism, modeled after FileExists. Use it to guard
creation of the report path directory.
This should avoid failures running the sanitizer in a sandbox where the
file creation attempt causes hard failures, even for an existing
directory. Problem reported on D109794 for ChromeOS in sandbox
(https://issuetracker.google.com/209296420).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119495
All platforms return the main executable as the first dl_phdr_info.
FreeBSD, NetBSD, Solaris, and Linux-musl place the executable name
in the dlpi_name field of this entry. It appears that only Linux-glibc
uses the empty string.
To make this work generically on all platforms, unconditionally skip the first
object (like is currently done for FreeBSD and NetBSD). This fixes first DSO
detection on Linux-musl with clang -shared-libsan/-shared-libasan and GCC's
default. It also would likely fix detection on Solaris/Illumos if it were to
gain PIE support (since dlpi_addr would not be NULL).
Additionally, only skip the Linux VDSO on linux.
Finally, use the empty string as the "seen first dl_phdr_info"
marker rather than (char *)-1. If there was no other object, we
would try to dereference it for a string comparison.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119515
Follow-up to 458ead66dc, which replaced the bespoke CMakeLists.txt
file for building a custom instrumented libc++ with an invocation of the
runtimes build.
In the the bespoke CMakeLists.txt, the LIBCXX_CXX_ABI setting was forced
to libcxxabi, but this was not done for the CMake invocation for the
runtimes build. This would cause CMake configuration issues on platforms
where the default LIBCXX_CXX_ABI setting is not libcxxabi, such as
FreeBSD.
Add `-DLIBCXX_CXX_ABI=libcxxabi` to that invocation, to make sure the
custom instrumented libc++ always uses the expected ABI.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119554
An infinite loop without any effects is illegal C++ and can be optimized
away by the compiler.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119575
This is a follow up to 4f3f4d6722
("sanitizer_common: fix __sanitizer_get_module_and_offset_for_pc signature mismatch")
which fixes a similar problem for msan build.
I am getting the following error compiling a unit test for code that
uses sanitizer_common headers and googletest transitively includes
sanitizer interface headers:
In file included from third_party/gwp_sanitizers/singlestep_test.cpp:3:
In file included from sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h:19:
sanitizer_interface_internal.h:41:5: error: typedef redefinition with different types
('struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments' vs 'struct __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments')
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
common_interface_defs.h:39:3: note: previous definition is here
} __sanitizer_sandbox_arguments;
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119546
We run bots on a shared machine and under high load
this test sometimes segfaults.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/185/builds/1368
==1952234==XRay FDR init successful.
==1952234==XRay FDR: Not flushing to file, 'no_file_flush=true'.
<...>fdr-reinit.cpp.script: line 4: 1952234 Segmentation fault
XRAY_OPTIONS="verbosity=1" <...>/fdr-reinit.cpp.tmp
Looking at the printed output I think it's happening at:
// Finally, we should signal the sibling thread to stop.
keep_going.clear(std::memory_order_release);
Disabling the test while I try to reproduce.
We are moving away from building the runtimes with LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS,
however the documentation was largely outdated. This commit updates all
the documentation I could find to use LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES instead of
LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS for building runtimes.
Note that in the near future, libcxx, libcxxabi and libunwind will stop
supporting being built with LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS altogether. I don't know
what the plans are for other runtimes like libc, openmp and compiler-rt,
so I didn't make any changes to the documentation that would imply
something for those projects.
Once this lands, I will also cherry-pick this on the release/14.x branch
to make sure that LLVM's documentation is up-to-date and reflects what
we intend to support in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119351
Summary:
This is neccessary to support solaris/sparc9 where some userspace
addresses have all top bits set, as well as, potentially, kernel memory
on aarch64.
This change does not update the compiler side (HWASan IR pass) which
needs to be done separately for the affected targets.
Reviewers: ro, vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91827
Fix passing the port and IP address with the wrong endianness
in get_sock_peer_name() that causes the connect() to fail inside
without an outgoing network interface (it's trying to connect
to 1.0.0.127 instead of 127.0.0.1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119461
We don't need precise control over the low-level behavior of these testcases so
C should be preferred for readability.
The new testcases test (1) the base dlopen case (running initializers and
deinitializers), and (2) the serial case of dlopen; dlclose; dlopen; dlclose,
where we expect the initializers and deinitializers to be run twice.
D116208 may cause a macro clash on older versions of linux, where
fs.h defines a READ macro. This is resolved by switching to a more
typical casing style for non-macro symbols.
Reapplying with changes to the symbol names in various platform
specific code, which I missed previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118783
D116208 may cause a macro clash on older versions of linux, where
fs.h defines a READ macro. This is resolved by switching to a more
typical casing style for non-macro symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118783
As reported in Issue #41838, `clang` doesn't correctly implement `long
double` on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC: the psABI requires this to be an 128-bit
type. Four sanitizer tests currently `FAIL` for this reason.
While there is a WIP patch to fix `clang` (D89130
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D89130>), it isn't complete yet and I've hit so
many brick walls while trying to finish it that I'm unsure if I ever will.
This patch therefore `XFAIL`s those tests in the meantime.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119016
Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri