Microsoft __if_exists/__if_not_exists statement. Also note that we
weren't traversing DeclarationNameInfo *at all* within the
RecursiveASTVisitor, which would be rather fatal for variadic
templates.
llvm-svn: 142906
statements. As noted in the documentation for the AST node, the
semantics of __if_exists/__if_not_exists are somewhat different from
the way Visual C++ implements them, because our parsed-template
representation can't accommodate VC++ semantics without serious
contortions. Hopefully this implementation is "good enough".
llvm-svn: 142901
analysis to separate dependent names from non-dependent names. For
dependent names, we'll behave differently from Visual C++:
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists at class scope, we'll just warn
and then ignore them.
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists in statements, we'll treat the
inner statement as a compound statement, which we only instantiate
in templates where the dependent name (after instantiation)
exists. This behavior is different from VC++, but it's as close as
we can get without encroaching ridiculousness.
The latter part (dependent statements) is not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 142864
Douglas Gregor