When the -maltivec flag is present, altivec.h is auto-included for the
compilation. This is not appropriate when the job action is to
preprocess a file containing assembly code. So don't do that.
I was unable to convert the test in the bug report into a regression
test. The original symptom was exposed with:
% touch x.S
% ./bin/clang -target powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu -maltivec -S -o - x.S
I tried this test (and numerous variants) on a PPC64 system:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// RUN: touch %t
// RUN: %clang -maltivec -S %t -o - | FileCheck %s
// Verify that assembling an empty file does not auto-include altivec.h.
// CHECK-NOT: static vector
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, this test passes for some reason even on a clang built
without the fix. I'd be happy to add a test case but at this point
I'm not able to figure one out, and I don't want to hold up the patch
unnecessarily. Please let me know if you have ideas.
Thanks,
Bill
llvm-svn: 185544
Darwin systems currently do not support dwarf version 3 or above. When we are
ready, we can bump the default to gdwarf-4 for Darwin.
For other systems, the default is dwarf version 3, if everything goes smoothly,
we can bump the version to 4.
rdar://13591116
llvm-svn: 185483
The way we decide which file to remove is fairly odd. I took a quick look at
maybe changing that, but it would be a more work than I want to put at this
right now, so I left pair of FIXMEs.
llvm-svn: 184766
when specifying --coverage (or related) flags.
The system for doing this was based on the old LLVM-hosted profile_rt
library, and hadn't been updated for Linux to use the new compiler-rt
library. Also, it couldn't possibly work on multiarch or biarch systems
in many cases. The whole thing now works much the same as the sanitizer
libraries that are built and used out of the compiler-rt repo.
Note that other target OSes haven't been updated because I don't know if
they're doing anything special with the installation path of profile_rt.
I suspect however that *all* of these are wrong and would encourage
maintainers of each target to take a hard look at how compiler-rt
runtime libraries are linked on their platforms.
llvm-svn: 184666
There are fundamentally two different things that were getting conflated
here.
1) A bi-arch GCC toolchain install. This is not a full blown cross
compiler, but it supports targetting both 32-bit and 64-bit variants
of the same architecture using multilib OS installs and runtimes.
2) A "multiarch" Debian OS/runtime layout that lays out the libraries,
headers, etc as-if there were going to be a full blown cross compiler
even when in reality it is just a bi-arch GCC targeting two variants.
Also, these tend to use oddly "canonicalized" triples without the
vendor in them unlike the typical cross compiler runtime library
search that vanilla GCC cross compilers perform.
Now, when we mean the bi-arch nature of GCC accomplished with just
a suffix or tweak to the GCC paths, we say 'Biarch' or something
related. When we mean the Debian layout of includes and libraries, we
say multiarch or reference the multiarch triple.
In the process of reading and often renaming stuff in all these places,
also reformat with clang-format. No functionality change should be going
on here, this is just tidying up.
llvm-svn: 184632
directory for programs used by the driver is actually the standard
behavior we want to be compatible with GCC cross compilers -- it isn't
specific to SUSE or any other distro.
Also start fleshing out testing of the different cross compilation
patterns, both with a new very bare-bones tree of cross compilers and by
extending the multilib trees. Currently, we don't correctly model doing
a cross compile using the non-triple target of a bi-arch GCC install,
but I'll add support for that (and tests) next.
llvm-svn: 184499
gcc's inputs are already added by the InputInfoList passed to
Action::ConstructJob.
Fixes a regression from r183989. This was manifesting when targetting
mingw as an extra input argument to gcc when assembling. It presumably
affects other situations where clang calls gcc.
Prior to r183989, forwardToGCC() was returning false because the INPUT
option defined in OptParser.td had the DriverOption flag set on it.
LLVM's Option library does not set this flag for INPUT.
Reviewers: espindola
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D999
llvm-svn: 184308
These options will add a module flag with name "Dwarf Version".
The behavior flag is currently set to Warning, so when two values disagree,
a warning will be emitted.
llvm-svn: 184276
This adds a bunch of llvm::opt name specifiers to all the uses of types
from that namespace.
Reviewers: espindola
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D983
llvm-svn: 184079
The big changes are:
- Deleting Driver/(Arg|Opt)*
- Rewriting includes to llvm/Option/ and re-sorting
- 'using namespace llvm::opt' in clang::driver
- Fixing the autoconf build by adding option everywhere
As discussed in the review, this change includes using directives in
header files. I'll make follow up changes to remove those in favor of
name specifiers.
Reviewers: espindola
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D975
llvm-svn: 183989
When choosing a default CPU, clang used to pick ARM7TDMI (which has Thumb) even
when the more restrictive armv4 triple was specified. This should fix that.
Patch by Jeroen Hofstee.
llvm-svn: 183905
Aaron Ballman