This is to fix PR34347. EmitAtomicExpr now only uses alignment information from
Type, instead of Decl, so when the declaration of an atomic variable is marked
to have the alignment equal as its size, EmitAtomicExpr doesn't know about it and
will generate libcall instead of atomic op. The patch uses EmitPointerWithAlignment
to get the precise alignment information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37310
llvm-svn: 312801
OpenCL 2.0 atomic builtin functions have a scope argument which is ideally
represented as synchronization scope argument in LLVM atomic instructions.
Clang supports translating Clang atomic builtin functions to LLVM atomic
instructions. However it currently does not support synchronization scope
of LLVM atomic instructions. Without this, users have to use LLVM assembly
code to implement OpenCL atomic builtin functions.
This patch adds OpenCL 2.0 atomic builtin functions as Clang builtin
functions, which supports generating LLVM atomic instructions with
synchronization scope operand.
Currently only constant memory scope argument is supported. Support of
non-constant memory scope argument will be added later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28691
llvm-svn: 310082
The functions creating LValues propagated information about alignment
source. Extend the propagated data to also include information about
possible unrestricted aliasing. A new class LValueBaseInfo will
contain both AlignmentSource and MayAlias info.
This patch should not introduce any functional changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33284
llvm-svn: 303358
It's possible to load out-of-range values from bitfields backed by a
boolean or an enum. Check for UB loads from bitfields.
This is the motivating example:
struct S {
BOOL b : 1; // Signed ObjC BOOL.
};
S s;
s.b = 1; // This is actually stored as -1.
if (s.b == 1) // Evaluates to false, -1 != 1.
...
Changes since the original commit:
- Single-bit bools are a special case (see CGF::EmitFromMemory), and we
can't avoid dealing with them when loading from a bitfield. Don't try to
insert a check in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30423
llvm-svn: 297389
It's possible to load out-of-range values from bitfields backed by a
boolean or an enum. Check for UB loads from bitfields.
This is the motivating example:
struct S {
BOOL b : 1; // Signed ObjC BOOL.
};
S s;
s.b = 1; // This is actually stored as -1.
if (s.b == 1) // Evaluates to false, -1 != 1.
...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30423
llvm-svn: 297298
abstract information about the callee. NFC.
The goal here is to make it easier to recognize indirect calls and
trigger additional logic in certain cases. That logic will come in
a later patch; in the meantime, I felt that this was a significant
improvement to the code.
llvm-svn: 285258
Underaligned atomic LValues require libcalls which MSVC doesn't have.
MSVC doesn't seem to consider such operations as requiring a barrier
anyway.
This fixes PR27843.
llvm-svn: 270576
Summary: See LLVM change D18775 for details, this change depends on it.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18776
llvm-svn: 265569
Volatile loads of type wider than a pointer get split by MSVC because
the base x86 ISA doesn't provide loads which are wider than pointer
width. LLVM assumes that it can emit an cmpxchg8b but this is
problematic if the memory is in a CONST memory segment.
Instead, provide behavior compatible with MSVC: split loads wider than a
pointer.
llvm-svn: 258506
In r244063, I had caused these builtins to call the same-named library
functions, __atomic_*_fetch_SIZE. However, this was incorrect: while
those functions are in fact supported by GCC's libatomic, they're not
documented by the spec (and gcc doesn't ever call them).
Instead, you're /supposed/ to call the __atomic_fetch_* builtins and
then redo the operation inline to return the final value.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14385
llvm-svn: 252920
When a struct's size is not a power of 2, the corresponding _Atomic() type is
promoted to the nearest. We already correctly handled normal C++ expressions of
this form, but direct calls to the __c11_atomic_whatever builtins ended up
performing dodgy operations on the smaller non-atomic types (e.g. memcpy too
much). Later optimisations removed this as undefined behaviour.
This patch converts EmitAtomicExpr to allocate its temporaries at the full
atomic width, sidestepping the issue.
llvm-svn: 252507
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.
As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.
The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.
Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.
We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.
Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.
ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.
I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.
llvm-svn: 246985
Support for emitting libcalls for __atomic_fetch_nand and
__atomic_{add,sub,and,or,xor,nand}_fetch was missing; add it, and some
test cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10847
llvm-svn: 244063
tools/clang/test/CodeGen/packed-nest-unpacked.c contains this test:
struct XBitfield {
unsigned b1 : 10;
unsigned b2 : 12;
unsigned b3 : 10;
};
struct YBitfield {
char x;
struct XBitfield y;
} __attribute((packed));
struct YBitfield gbitfield;
unsigned test7() {
// CHECK: @test7
// CHECK: load i32, i32* getelementptr inbounds (%struct.YBitfield, %struct.YBitfield* @gbitfield, i32 0, i32 1, i32 0), align 4
return gbitfield.y.b2;
}
The "align 4" is actually wrong. Accessing all of "gbitfield.y" as a single
i32 is of course possible, but that still doesn't make it 4-byte aligned as
it remains packed at offset 1 in the surrounding gbitfield object.
This alignment was changed by commit r169489, which also introduced changes
to bitfield access code in CGExpr.cpp. Code before that change used to take
into account *both* the alignment of the field to be accessed within the
current struct, *and* the alignment of that outer struct itself; this logic
was removed by the above commit.
Neglecting to consider both values can cause incorrect code to be generated
(I've seen an unaligned access crash on SystemZ due to this bug).
In order to always use the best known alignment value, this patch removes
the CGBitFieldInfo::StorageAlignment member and replaces it with a
StorageOffset member specifying the offset from the start of the surrounding
struct to the bitfield's underlying storage. This offset can then be combined
with the best-known alignment for a bitfield access lvalue to determine the
alignment to use when accessing the bitfield's storage.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11034
llvm-svn: 241916
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Adds atomic update codegen for the following forms of expressions:
x binop= expr;
x++;
++x;
x--;
--x;
x = x binop expr;
x = expr binop x;
If x and expr are integer and binop is associative or x is a LHS in a RHS of the assignment expression, and atomics are allowed for type of x on the target platform atomicrmw instruction is emitted.
Otherwise compare-and-swap sequence is emitted:
bb:
...
atomic load <x>
cont:
<expected> = phi [ <x>, label %bb ], [ <new_failed>, %cont ]
<desired> = <expected> binop <expr>
<res> = cmpxchg atomic &<x>, desired, expected
<new_failed> = <res>.field1;
br <res>field2, label %exit, label %cont
exit:
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8536
llvm-svn: 233513
For global reg lvalue - use regular store through global register.
For simple lvalue - use simple atomic store.
For bitfields, vector element, extended vector elements - the original value of the whole storage (for vector elements) or of some aligned value (for bitfields) is atomically read, the part of this value for the given lvalue is modified and then use atomic compare-and-exchange operation to try to atomically write modified value (if it was not modified).
Also, changes in this patch fix the bug for '#pragma omp atomic read' applied to extended vector elements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7369
llvm-svn: 230736
The /volatile:ms semantics turn volatile loads and stores into atomic
acquire and release operations. This distinction is important because
volatile memory operations do not form a happens-before relationship
with non-atomic memory. This means that a volatile store is not
sufficient for implementing a mutex unlock routine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7580
llvm-svn: 229082
"omp atomic read [seq_cst]" accepts expressions "v=x;". In this patch we perform
an atomic load of "x" (using builtin atomic loading instructions or a call to
"atomic_load()" for simple lvalues and "kmpc_atomic_start();load
<x>;kmpc_atomic_end();" for other lvalues), convert the result of loading to
type of "v" (using EmitScalarConversion() for simple types and
EmitComplexToScalarConversion() for conversions from complex to scalar) and then
store the result in "v".)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6431
llvm-svn: 226788
"omp atomic read [seq_cst]" accepts expressions "v=x;". In this patch we perform
an atomic load of "x" (using builtin atomic loading instructions or a call to
"atomic_load()" for simple lvalues and "kmpc_atomic_start();load
<x>;kmpc_atomic_end();" for other lvalues), convert the result of loading to
type of "v" (using EmitScalarConversion() for simple types and
EmitComplexToScalarConversion() for conversions from complex to scalar) and then
store the result in "v".)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6431
llvm-svn: 226786
"omp atomic read [seq_cst]" accepts expressions "v=x;". In this patch we perform
an atomic load of "x" (using builtin atomic loading instructions or a call to
"atomic_load()" for simple lvalues and "kmpc_atomic_start();load
<x>;kmpc_atomic_end();" for other lvalues), convert the result of loading to
type of "v" (using EmitScalarConversion() for simple types and
EmitComplexToScalarConversion() for conversions from complex to scalar) and then
store the result in "v".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6431
llvm-svn: 226784
Currently clang fires assertions on x86-64 on any atomic operations for long double operands. Patch fixes codegen for such operations.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6499
llvm-svn: 224230
Summary:
We did a great job getting this wrong:
- We messed up which LLVM IR types to use for arguments and return values.
The optimized libcalls use integer types for values.
Clang attempted to use the IR type which corresponds to the value
passed in instead of using an appropriately sized integer type. This
would result in violations of the ABI for, as an example, floating
point types.
- We didn't bother recording the result of the atomic libcall in the
destination memory.
Instead, call the functions with arguments matching the type of the
libcall prototype's parameters.
This fixes PR20780.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5098
llvm-svn: 216714
The MS ABI has a notion of 'required alignment' for fields; this
alignment supercedes pragma pack directives.
MSVC takes into account alignment attributes on typedefs when
determining whether or not a field has a certain required alignment.
Do the same in clang by tracking whether or not we saw such an attribute
when calculating the type's bitwidth and alignment.
This fixes PR20418.
Reviewers: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4714
llvm-svn: 214274
Most builtins date from before the "cmpxchg weak" was a gleam in the
C++ committee's eye, so fortunately not much needs to change. But a
few of them *do* acknowledge that failure is possible.
For these, we'll emit the usual cartesian product of cmpxchg
operations if we can't statically determine weakness. CodeGen can
sort it out later if the function gets inlined.
The only other non-trivial aspect of this is (I think) that we emit
the scalar expression for "IsWeak" once, at the beginning, and
propagate its value through the successive blocks. There's not much in
it, but it's slightly more consistent with the existing handling of
FailureOrder.
llvm-svn: 210932
This is a minimal fix for clang. I'll soon add support for generating
weak variants when requested, but that's not really necessary for the
LLVM change in isolation.
llvm-svn: 210907
This commit fixes a cast instruction assertion failure
due to the incompatible type cast. This will only happen when
the target requires atomic libcalls.
llvm-svn: 204834
This makes Clang take advantage of the recent IR addition of a
"failure" memory ordering requirement. As with the "success" ordering,
we try to emit just a single version if the expression is constant,
but fall back to runtime detection (to allow optimisation across
function-call boundaries).
rdar://problem/15996804
llvm-svn: 203837
This is a conservative check, because it's valid for the expression to be
non-constant, and in cases like that we just don't know whether it's valid.
rdar://problem/16242991
llvm-svn: 203561
Summary:
'Expected' should only be modified if the operation fails.
This fixes PR18899.
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith, rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2922
llvm-svn: 203493
CodeGenABITypes is a wrapper built on top of CodeGenModule that exposes
some of the functionality of CodeGenTypes (held by CodeGenModule),
specifically methods that determine the LLVM types appropriate for
function argument and return values.
I addition to CodeGenABITypes.h, CGFunctionInfo.h is introduced, and the
definitions of ABIArgInfo, RequiredArgs, and CGFunctionInfo are moved
into this new header from the private headers ABIInfo.h and CGCall.h.
Exposing this functionality is one part of making it possible for LLDB
to determine the actual ABI locations of function arguments and return
values, making it possible for it to determine this for any supported
target without hard-coding ABI knowledge in the LLDB code.
llvm-svn: 193717
For integer types of sizes 1, 2, 4 and 8, libcompiler-rt (and libgcc)
provide atomic functions that pass parameters by value and return
results directly.
libgcc and libcompiler-rt only provide optimized libcalls for
__atomic_fetch_*, as generic libcalls on non-integer types would make
little sense. This means that we can finally make __atomic_fetch_* work
on architectures for which we don't provide these operations as builtins
(e.g. ARM).
This should fix the dreaded "cannot compile this atomic library call
yet" error that would pop up once every while.
llvm-svn: 183033
Wei Mi