Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith 24ad121582 Add -std=c++20 flag, replace C++2a with C++20 throughout the Clang
user interface and documentation, and update __cplusplus for C++20.

WG21 considers the C++20 standard to be finished (even though it still
has some more steps to pass through in the ISO process).

The old flag names are accepted for compatibility, as usual, and we
still have lots of references to C++2a in comments and identifiers;
those can be cleaned up separately.
2020-02-18 16:16:37 -08:00
Gauthier Harnisch 796ed03b84 [C++20] add Basic consteval specifier
Summary:
this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html

with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration.

Changes:
 - add the consteval keyword.
 - add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions.
 - add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval.
 - adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case.
 - add tests for basic semantic.

Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790

llvm-svn: 363362
2019-06-14 08:56:20 +00:00
Richard Smith 76b9027f35 [c++20] Add support for explicit(bool), as described in P0892R2.
Patch by Tyker!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934

llvm-svn: 360311
2019-05-09 03:59:21 +00:00
Hans Wennborg d2b9fc88c8 Revert r359949 "[clang] adding explicit(bool) from c++2a"
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:

  struct S {
    template <typename = int> explicit S();
  };

  struct T : S {};

  struct U : T {
    U();
  };
  U::U() {}

  $ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
  /tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
  U::U() {}
     ^
  /tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
    because base class 'S' has no default constructor
  struct T : S {};
             ^
  1 error generated.

See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.

This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.

> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934

llvm-svn: 360024
2019-05-06 09:51:10 +00:00
Nicolas Lesser 5fe2ddbdf4 [clang] adding explicit(bool) from c++2a
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.

Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.

This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.

Patch by Tyker

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934

llvm-svn: 359949
2019-05-04 00:09:00 +00:00
Richard Smith 28ddb91dec [c++20] Implement P0482R6: enable -fchar8_t by default in C++20 mode.
This unfortunately results in a substantial breaking change when
switching to C++20, but it's not yet clear what / how much we should
do about that. We may want to add a compatibility conversion from
u8 string literals to const char*, similar to how C++98 provided a
compatibility conversion from string literals to non-const char*,
but that's not handled by this patch.

The feature can be disabled in C++20 mode with -fno-char8_t.

llvm-svn: 346892
2018-11-14 21:04:34 +00:00
Richard Smith 79c88c3105 P1008R1 Classes with user-declared constructors are never aggregates in
C++20.

llvm-svn: 343131
2018-09-26 19:00:16 +00:00