When deserializing a RecordDecl we don't enforce that redeclaration
chain contains only a single definition. So if the canonical decl is not
a definition itself, `RecordType::getDecl` can return different objects
before and after an include. It means we can build CGRecordLayout for
one RecordDecl with its set of FieldDecl but try to use it with
FieldDecl belonging to a different RecordDecl. With assertions enabled
it results in
> Assertion failed: (FieldInfo.count(FD) && "Invalid field for record!"),
> function getLLVMFieldNo, file llvm-project/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayout.h, line 199.
and with assertions disabled a bunch of fields are treated as their
memory is located at offset 0.
Fix by keeping the first encountered RecordDecl definition and marking
the subsequent ones as non-definitions. Also need to merge FieldDecl
properly, so that `getPrimaryMergedDecl` works correctly and during name
lookup we don't treat fields from same-name RecordDecl as ambiguous.
rdar://80184238
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106994
D31709 added an assertion was added to `FullSourceLoc::hasManager()` that ensured a valid `SourceLocation` is always paired with a `SourceManager`, and missing `SourceManager` is always paired with an invalid `SourceLocation`.
This appears to be incorrect, since clients never cared about constructing `FullSourceLoc` to uphold that invariant, or always checking `isValid()` before calling `hasManager()`.
The assertion started failing when serializing diagnostics pointing into an explicit module. Explicit modules don't have valid `SourceLocation` for the `import` statement, since they are "imported" from the command-line argument `-fmodule-name=x.pcm`.
This patch removes the assertion, since `FullSourceLoc` was never intended to uphold any kind of invariants between the validity of `SourceLocation` and presence of `SourceManager`.
Reviewed By: arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106862
It's useful to be able to load explicitly-built PCH files into an implicit build (e.g. during dependency scanning). That's currently impossible, since the explicitly-built PCH has an empty modules cache path, while the current compilation has (and needs to have) a valid path, triggering an error in the `PCHValidator`.
This patch adds a preprocessor option and command-line flag that can be used to omit this check.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103802
This patch enables explicitly building inferred modules.
Effectively a cherry-pick of https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/699 authored by @Bigcheese with libclang and dependency scanner changes omitted.
Contains the following changes:
1. [Clang] Fix the header paths in clang::Module for inferred modules.
* The UmbrellaAsWritten and NameAsWritten fields in clang::Module are a lie for framework modules. For those they actually are the path to the header or umbrella relative to the clang::Module::Directory.
* The exception to this case is for inferred modules. Here it actually is the name as written, because we print out the module and read it back in when implicitly building modules. This causes a problem when explicitly building an inferred module, as we skip the printing out step.
* In order to fix this issue this patch adds a new field for the path we want to use in getInputBufferForModule. It also makes NameAsWritten actually be the name written in the module map file (or that would be, in the case of an inferred module).
2. [Clang] Allow explicitly building an inferred module.
* Building the actual module still fails, but make sure it fails for the right reason.
Split from D100934.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102491
If a module contains errors (ie. it was built with
-fallow-pcm-with-compiler-errors and had errors) and was from the module
cache, it is marked as out of date - see
a2c1054c30.
When a module is imported multiple times in the one compile, this caused
it to be recompiled each time - removing the existing buffer from the
module cache and replacing it. This results in various errors further
down the line.
Instead, only mark the module as out of date if it isn't already
finalized in the module cache.
Reviewed By: akyrtzi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100619
A module in the cache with an error should just be a cache miss. If
allowing errors (with -fallow-pcm-with-compiler-errors), a rebuild is
needed so that the appropriate diagnostics are output and in case search
paths have changed. If not allowing errors, the module was built
*allowing* errors and thus should be rebuilt regardless.
Reviewed By: akyrtzi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95989
The static_assert in "libcxx/include/memory" was the main offender here,
but then I figured I might as well `git grep -i instantat` and fix all
the instances I found. One was in user-facing HTML documentation;
the rest were in comments or tests.
In some cases, when deserializing a `CXXMethodDecl` of a `CXXSpecializationTemplateDecl`,
the call to `FunctionDecl::setPure()` happens before the `DefinitionData` member has been
populated (which appears to happen lower down in a `mergeRedeclarable` call), causing a
crash (https://reviews.llvm.org/P8228).
This diff fixes this by deferring the `FunctionDecl::setPure()` till after the `DefinitionData` has
been filled in.
Reviewed By: lxfind
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86853
As with precompiled headers, it's useful for indexers to be able to
continue through compiler errors in dependent modules.
Resolves rdar://69816264
Reviewed By: akyrtzi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91580
The behavior is controlled by the `-fprebuilt-implicit-modules` option, and
allows searching for implicit modules in the prebuilt module cache paths.
The current command-line options for prebuilt modules do not allow to easily
maintain and use multiple versions of modules. Both the producer and users of
prebuilt modules are required to know the relationships between compilation
options and module file paths. Using a particular version of a prebuilt module
requires passing a particular option on the command line (e.g.
`-fmodule-file=[<name>=]<file>` or `-fprebuilt-module-path=<directory>`).
However the compiler already knows how to distinguish and automatically locate
implicit modules. Hence this proposal to introduce the
`-fprebuilt-implicit-modules` option. When set, it enables searching for
implicit modules in the prebuilt module paths (specified via
`-fprebuilt-module-path`). To not modify existing behavior, this search takes
place after the standard search for prebuilt modules. If not
Here is a workflow illustrating how both the producer and consumer of prebuilt
modules would need to know what versions of prebuilt modules are available and
where they are located.
clang -cc1 -x c modulemap -fmodules -emit-module -fmodule-name=foo -fmodules-cache-path=prebuilt_modules_v1 <config 1 options>
clang -cc1 -x c modulemap -fmodules -emit-module -fmodule-name=foo -fmodules-cache-path=prebuilt_modules_v2 <config 2 options>
clang -cc1 -x c modulemap -fmodules -emit-module -fmodule-name=foo -fmodules-cache-path=prebuilt_modules_v3 <config 3 options>
clang -cc1 -x c use.c -fmodules fmodule-map-file=modulemap -fprebuilt-module-path=prebuilt_modules_v1 <config 1 options>
clang -cc1 -x c use.c -fmodules fmodule-map-file=modulemap <non-prebuilt config options>
With prebuilt implicit modules, the producer can generate prebuilt modules as
usual, all in the same output directory. The same mechanisms as for implicit
modules take care of incorporating hashes in the path to distinguish between
module versions.
Note that we do not specify the output module filename, so `-o` implicit modules are generated in the cache path `prebuilt_modules`.
clang -cc1 -x c modulemap -fmodules -emit-module -fmodule-name=foo -fmodules-cache-path=prebuilt_modules <config 1 options>
clang -cc1 -x c modulemap -fmodules -emit-module -fmodule-name=foo -fmodules-cache-path=prebuilt_modules <config 2 options>
clang -cc1 -x c modulemap -fmodules -emit-module -fmodule-name=foo -fmodules-cache-path=prebuilt_modules <config 3 options>
The user can now simply enable prebuilt implicit modules and point to the
prebuilt modules cache. No need to "parse" command-line options to decide
what prebuilt modules (paths) to use.
clang -cc1 -x c use.c -fmodules fmodule-map-file=modulemap -fprebuilt-module-path=prebuilt_modules -fprebuilt-implicit-modules <config 1 options>
clang -cc1 -x c use.c -fmodules fmodule-map-file=modulemap -fprebuilt-module-path=prebuilt_modules -fprebuilt-implicit-modules <non-prebuilt config options>
This is for example particularly useful in a use-case where compilation is
expensive, and the configurations expected to be used are predictable, but not
controlled by the producer of prebuilt modules. Modules for the set of
predictable configurations can be prebuilt, and using them does not require
"parsing" the configuration (command-line options).
Reviewed By: Bigcheese
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68997
This is triggered during serialization. The test is for modules, but
will occur for any serialization effort using asm goto.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88195
The orignal patch with the missing 'REQUIRES: asserts' as there is a debug-only
flag used in the test.
Original summary:
D81347 changes the ASTFileSignature to be an array of 20 uint8_t instead of 5
uint32_t. However, it didn't update the code in ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations
that creates the dwoID in the module from the ASTFileSignature
(`Buffer->Signature` being the array subclass that is now `std::array<uint8_t,
20>` instead of `std::array<uint32_t, 5>`).
```
uint64_t Signature = [..] (uint64_t)Buffer->Signature[1] << 32 | Buffer->Signature[0]
```
This code works with the old ASTFileSignature (where two uint32_t are enough to
fill the uint64_t), but after the patch this only took two bytes from the
ASTFileSignature and only partly filled the Signature uint64_t.
This caused that the dwoID in the module ref and the dwoID in the actual module
no longer match (which in turns causes that LLDB keeps warning about the dwoID's
not matching when debugging -gmodules-compiled binaries).
This patch just unifies the logic for turning the ASTFileSignature into an
uint64_t which makes the dwoID match again (and should prevent issues like that
in the future).
Reviewed By: aprantl, dang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84013
This relands D84013 but with a test that relies on less shell features to
hopefully make the test pass on Fuchsia (where the test from the previous patch
version strangely failed with a plain "Exit code 1").
Original summary:
D81347 changes the ASTFileSignature to be an array of 20 uint8_t instead of 5 uint32_t.
However, it didn't update the code in ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations that creates
the dwoID in the module from the ASTFileSignature (`Buffer->Signature` being the
array subclass that is now `std::array<uint8_t, 20>` instead of `std::array<uint32_t, 5>`).
```
uint64_t Signature = [..] (uint64_t)Buffer->Signature[1] << 32 | Buffer->Signature[0]
```
This code works with the old ASTFileSignature (where two uint32_t are enough to
fill the uint64_t), but after the patch this only took two bytes from the ASTFileSignature
and only partly filled the Signature uint64_t.
This caused that the dwoID in the module ref and the dwoID in the actual module no
longer match (which in turns causes that LLDB keeps warning about the dwoID's not
matching when debugging -gmodules-compiled binaries).
This patch just unifies the logic for turning the ASTFileSignature into an uint64_t which
makes the dwoID match again (and should prevent issues like that in the future).
Reviewed By: aprantl, dang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84013
This commit teaches ASTDeclReader::attachPreviousDecl to successfully merge
two Decl's when one contains an inheritable attribute like the
MSInheritanceAttr. Usually, attributes that are needed to be present along the
redeclaration chain are attached during ASTReading from
ASTDeclReader::attachPreviousDecl, but no such thing is done for inheritable
attributes. Currently, only the logic for merging MSInheritanceAttr is
provided.
D81347 changes the ASTFileSignature to be an array of 20 uint8_t instead of 5
uint32_t. However, it didn't update the code in ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations
that creates the dwoID in the module from the ASTFileSignature
(`Buffer->Signature` being the array subclass that is now `std::array<uint8_t,
20>` instead of `std::array<uint32_t, 5>`).
```
uint64_t Signature = [..] (uint64_t)Buffer->Signature[1] << 32 | Buffer->Signature[0]
```
This code works with the old ASTFileSignature (where two uint32_t are enough to
fill the uint64_t), but after the patch this only took two bytes from the
ASTFileSignature and only partly filled the Signature uint64_t.
This caused that the dwoID in the module ref and the dwoID in the actual module
no longer match (which in turns causes that LLDB keeps warning about the dwoID's
not matching when debugging -gmodules-compiled binaries).
This patch just unifies the logic for turning the ASTFileSignature into an
uint64_t which makes the dwoID match again (and should prevent issues like that
in the future).
Reviewed By: aprantl, dang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84013
HeaderSearch was marking requested HeaderFileInfo as Resolved only based on
the presence of ExternalSource. As the result, using any module was enough
to set ExternalSource and headers unknown to this module would have
HeaderFileInfo with empty fields, including `isImport = 0`, `NumIncludes = 0`.
Such HeaderFileInfo was preserved without changes regardless of how the
header was used in other modules and caused incorrect result in
`HeaderSearch::ShouldEnterIncludeFile`.
Fix by marking HeaderFileInfo as Resolved only if ExternalSource knows
about this header.
rdar://problem/62126911
Reviewed By: bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80263
Allow to build PCH's (with -building-pch-with-obj and the extra .o file)
with -fmodules-codegen -fmodules-debuginfo to allow emitting shared code
into the extra .o file, similarly to how it works with modules. A bit of
a misnomer, but the underlying functionality is the same. This saves up
to 20% of build time here. The patch is fairly simple, it basically just
duplicates -fmodules checks to also alternatively check
-building-pch-with-obj.
This already got committed as cbc9d22e49,
but then got reverted in 7ea9a6e022
because of PR44953, as discussed in D74846. This is a corrected version
which does not include two places for the PCH case that aren't included
in the modules -fmodules-codegen path either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69778
declaration is not visible.
In passing, add a test for a similar case of conflicting redeclarations
of internal-linkage structured bindings. (This case already works).
Summary:
This record is constructed by hashing the bytes of the AST block in a similiar
fashion to the SIGNATURE record. This new signature only means anything if the
AST block is fully relocatable, i.e. it does not embed absolute offsets within
the PCM file. This change ensure this does not happen by replacing these offsets
with offsets relative to the nearest relevant subblock of the AST block.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, dexonsmith
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80383
Previously, this would fail if the builtin headers had been "claimed" by
a different module that wraps these builtin headers. libc++ does this,
for example.
This change adds a test demonstrating this situation; the test fails
without the fix.
This reverts commit 9b2ab41037 and
reinstates e62dc1f625 with changes.
This fix is speculative, since I don't have access to a crashing test
case for the old code, and fixing the crash bug on Windows when C++20 is
enabled seems more important than running it down.
This reverts commit e62dc1f625.
Reverting as per discussion with the patch author.
This patch causes module import error, but there was no intended
behavior change for code that does not use Microsoft extensions.
whether they have missing header files.
Whether a module's headers happen to be present on the local file system
should make no difference to whether we make its contents visible when
importing another module that re-exports it. If we have an up-to-date
AST file that we can load, that's all that matters.
This fixes the ability to header syntax checking for modular headers in
C++20 mode (or in prior modes where -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility
is enabled but -fmodules is not).
An enum may be considered to be a complete type if it was forward
declared. It may be declared with a fixed underlying type, or, in MSVC
compatiblity mode, with no type at all.
Previously, the code was written with special handling for fixed enums.
I generalized the code to check if the underlying integer type is known,
which should be the case when targetting the MSVC C++ ABI.
Fixes PR45409
As per comment on https://reviews.llvm.org/D72860, it is suggested to
revert this change in the meantime, since it has introduced regression.
This reverts commit 83f4c3af02.
Support only preferred spelling 'Modules/module.private.modulemap' and
not the deprecated 'module_private.map'.
rdar://problem/57715533
Reviewed By: bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75311
This is a longstanding bug that seems to have been hidden by
a combination of (1) the normal flow being to deserialize the
interface before deserializing its parameter and (2) a precise
ordering of work that was apparently recently disturbed,
perhaps by my abstract-serialization work or Bruno's ObjC
module merging work.
Fixes rdar://59153545.
Partially reverts 0a2be46cfd as it turned
out to cause redundant module rebuilds in multi-process incremental builds.
When a module was getting out of date, all compilation processes started at the
same time were marking it as `ToBuild`. So each process was building the same
module instead of checking if it was built by someone else and using that
result. In addition to the work duplication, contention on the same .pcm file
wasn't making builds faster.
Note that for a single-process build this change would cause redundant module
reads and validations. But reading a module is faster than building it and
multi-process builds are more common than single-process. So I'm willing to
make such a trade-off.
rdar://problem/54395127
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72860
Allow to build PCH's (with -building-pch-with-obj and the extra .o file)
with -fmodules-codegen -fmodules-debuginfo to allow emitting shared code
into the extra .o file, similarly to how it works with modules. A bit of
a misnomer, but the underlying functionality is the same. This saves up
to 20% of build time here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69778
Summary:
Otherwise the definition (first found) for ObjCInterfaceDecl's might
precede the module one, which will eventually lead to crash, since
diagnoseMissingImport needs one coming from a module.
This behavior changed after Richard's r342018, which started to look
into the definition of ObjCInterfaceDecls.
rdar://problem/49237144
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, ributzka, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66982
llvm-svn: 372039
Marking a module for a rebuild when its signature differs from the
expected one causes redundant module rebuilds for incremental builds.
When a module is updated, its signature changes. But its consumers still
have the old signature and loading them will result in signature
mismatches. It will correctly cause the rebuilds for the consumers but
we don't need to rebuild the common module for each of them as it is
already up to date.
In practice this bug causes longer build times. We are doing more work
than required and only a single process can build a module, so parallel
builds degrade to a single-process mode where extra processes are just
waiting on a file lock.
Fix by not marking a module dependency for a rebuild on signature
mismatch. We'll check if it is up to date when we load it.
rdar://problem/50212358
Reviewers: dexonsmith, bruno, rsmith
Reviewed By: dexonsmith, bruno
Subscribers: jkorous, ributzka, cfe-commits, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66907
llvm-svn: 370274
The code is/was already correct for the case where a parameter is a
parameter of its enclosing lexical DeclContext (functions and classes).
But for other templates (alias and variable templates) they don't create
their own scope to be members of - in those cases, they parameter should
be considered visible if any definition of the lexical decl context is
visible.
[this should cleanup the failure on the libstdc++ modules buildbot]
[this doesn't actually fix the variable template case for a
secondary/compounding reason (its lexical decl context is incorrectly
considered to be the translation unit)]
Test covers all 4 kinds of templates with default args, including a
regression test for the still broken variable template case.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60892
llvm-svn: 358795
Volodymyr Sapsai