Commit Graph

60 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
John McCall 478382521e When re-using a vtable slot for the nearest overridden method, just because
there's no return adjustment from the overridden to the overrider doesn't
mean there isn't a return adjustment from the overrider to the final
overrider.  This matters if we're emitting a virtual this-adjustment thunk
because the overrider virtually inherits from the class providing the
nearest overridden method.  Do the appropriate return adjustment in this case.

Fixes PR7611.

llvm-svn: 118466
2010-11-09 01:18:05 +00:00
John McCall b3732bb3b7 Just disable the hidden-visibility optimization for now by hiding it behind
a -cc1 option.  The Darwin linker complains about mixed visibility when linking
gcc-built objects with clang-built objects, and the optimization isn't really
that valuable.  Platforms with less ornery linkers can feel free to enable this.

llvm-svn: 110979
2010-08-12 23:36:15 +00:00
John McCall c8bd9c277b Extend the visibility-hidden optimization to linkonce_odr thunks for
functions with in-line definitions, since such thunks will be emitted at any
use of the function.

Completes the feature work for rdar://problem/7523229.

llvm-svn: 110285
2010-08-04 23:46:35 +00:00
John McCall 6a7f9f5c8f Don't try to emit the vtable for a class just because we're emitting a
virtual function from it.

Fixes PR7241.

llvm-svn: 105345
2010-06-02 21:22:02 +00:00
John McCall 23f6626262 Correctly pass aggregates by reference when emitting thunks.
llvm-svn: 104778
2010-05-26 22:34:26 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c5871f07f0 When generating the call arguments in a thunk to call the thunkee, do
not make copies non-POD arguments or arguments passed by reference:
just copy the pointers directly. This eliminates another source of the
dreaded memcpy-of-non-PODs. Fixes PR7188.

llvm-svn: 104327
2010-05-21 17:55:12 +00:00
Douglas Gregor aa2ac80eaa When creating a this-adjustment thunk where the return value is of C++
class type (that uses a return slot), pass the return slot to the
callee directly rather than allocating new storage and trying to copy
the object. This appears to have been the cause of the remaining two
Boost.Interprocess failures.

llvm-svn: 104215
2010-05-20 05:54:35 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 88d292ccb8 Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions. 

The new scheme:
  - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
  the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
  function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
  dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
  to/through a virtual base class, etc.
  - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
  indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
  unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
  delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
  occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
 - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
 functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
 function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
 member functions when needed.
  - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
  ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
  them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
  vtables lazily). 

From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).

Notes:
  (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
  vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
  the larger tests from these issues.
  (2) Some diagnostics related to
  implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
  have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
  way.
  (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
  see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
  vtable.

Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.

llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-13 16:44:06 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 174376629a Give thunks the same linkage as their original methods.
llvm-svn: 99729
2010-03-27 20:50:27 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 68fdb871dc Flip the switch and use the new vtable layout code for thunks by default. Add a thunks.cpp test.
llvm-svn: 99367
2010-03-24 00:41:37 +00:00