Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
This is a re-application of r348824, which broke the build in C++03 mode
because a test was marked as supported in C++03 when it shouldn't be.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348847
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348824
Summary:
When providing a non-const-callable comparator in a map or set, the
warning diagnostic does not include the point of instantiation of
the container that triggered the warning, which makes it difficult
to track down the problem. This commit improves the diagnostic by
placing it directly in the body of the associative container.
The same change is applied to unordered associative containers, which
had a similar problem.
Finally, this commit cleans up the forward declarations of several
map and unordered_map helpers, which are not needed anymore.
<rdar://problem/41370747>
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48955
llvm-svn: 348529
The tests were marked to fail based on the 'availability' LIT feature.
However, those tests should really only be failing when we run them
against the dylibs that were deployed on macosx10.7 and macosx10.8,
which the deployment target has nothing to do with.
This caused the tests to unexpectedly pass when running the tests
with deployment target macosx10.{7,8} but running with a recent dylib.
llvm-svn: 348520
The standard section [array.zero] requires the return value of begin()
and end() methods of a zero-sized array to be unique. Eric Fiselier
clarifies: "That unique value cannot be null, and must be properly aligned".
This patch adds checks for the first part of this clarification: unique
value returned by these methods cannot be null.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55366.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348509
The section array.zero says: "The return value of data() is unspecified".
This patch marks all checks of the array<T, 0>.data() return value as
libc++ specific.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55364.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348485
Whether an explicit instantiation declaration should be provided is not
a matter of availability markup.
This problem is exemplified by the fact that some tests were incorrectly
marked as XFAIL when they should instead have been using the definition
of streams from the headers, and hence passing, and that, regardless of
whether visibility annotations are enabled.
llvm-svn: 348436
Summary:
This was voted into C++20 in San Diego. Note that there was a revision
D0318R2 which did include unwrap_reference_t, but we mistakingly voted
P0318R1 into the C++20 Working Draft (which does not include
unwrap_reference_t). This patch implements D0318R2, which is what
we'll end up with in the Working Draft once this mistake has been
fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54485
llvm-svn: 348138
The test was previously marked as unsupported on all Apple platforms, when
we really just want to mark it as unsupported for previously shipped dylibs
on macosx.
llvm-svn: 347920
Summary:
std::bad_array_length was added by n3467, but this never made it into C++.
This commit removes the definition of std::bad_array_length from the headers
AND from the shared library. See the comments in the ABI changelog for details
about the ABI implications of this change.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, dexonsmith, howard.hinnant, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54804
llvm-svn: 347903
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
Summary:
std::dynarray had been proposed for C++14, but it was pulled out from C++14
and there are no plans to standardize it anymore.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54801
llvm-svn: 347783
This patch adds an implementation of __resize_default_init as
described in P1072R2. Additionally, it uses it in filesystem to
demonstrate its intended utility.
Once P1072 lands, or if it changes it's interface, I will adjust
the internal libc++ implementation to match.
llvm-svn: 347589
In r339743, I marked several aligned allocation tests as downright
unsupported on macosx in an attempt to unbreak the build. It turns
out that marking them as unuspported whenever we're on OS X is way
too coarse grained. This commit marks the tests as XFAIL with more
granularity.
llvm-svn: 347585
The test was marked as failing whenever the deployment target was 10.12
or older, but in reality the test passes when the deployment target is
10.12 on recent Clangs. This happens because only older clangs do not
honor the -faligned-allocation flag, which disables any availability
error related to aligned allocation support, regardless of the
deployment target.
llvm-svn: 347580
Summary:
In PR39232, we noticed that some variant tests started failing in C++2a mode
with recent Clangs, because the rules for literal types changed in C++2a. As
a result, a temporary fix was checked in (enabling the test only in C++17).
This commit is what I believe should be the long term fix: I removed the
tests that checked constexpr default-constructibility with a weird type
from the tests for index() and valueless_by_exception(), and instead I
added tests for those using an obviously literal type in the test for the
default constructor.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54767
llvm-svn: 347568
This is a revert of r347421, except I'm using the with_system_cxx_lib
lit feature instead of availability to mark the test as unsupported
(because the problem is a bug in the dylib itself). In r347421, I said
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue and that's why I was removing it:
this was because I ran lit slightly wrong. The problem mentioned really
exists.
llvm-svn: 347475
The iterator types for different specializations of containers with the
same element type but different allocators are not required to be
convertible. This patch makes the test to take the iterator type from
the same container specialization as the created container.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54806.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347423
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue referred to by the comment using
the libc++'s shipped with mac OS X 10.7 and 10.8, so I assume this may
have been fixed in a function that is now shipped in the headers. In
that case, the tests will pass no matter what dylib we're using.
In the worst case, some test bots will start failing and I'll understand
why I was wrong, and I can create an actual lit feature for it. Note
that I could just leave this test alone, but this change is on the path
towards eradicating vendor-specific availability markup from the test
suite.
llvm-svn: 347421
The XFAIL started passing since we're only testing for trivial-copyability of
reference_wrapper in C++14 and above. This commit constrains the XFAIL to
gcc-4.9 with C++14 (it would also fail on C++17 and above, but those standards
are not available with GCC 4.9).
llvm-svn: 347264
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347232
A bunch of unordered containers tests call library functions but don't directly
include the corresponding header files:
- fabs() (defined in <cmath> which is not included);
- is_permutation() (defined in <algorithm> which is not included);
- next() (defined in <iterator> which is not included).
- As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54643.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347085
This was implicitly converting [1, 3] to bool, which triggers
an MSVC warning. The test should just pass `true`, which is
simpler, has the same behavior, and avoids the warning. (This
is a library test, not a compiler test, and the conversion happens
before calling `push_back`, so passing [1, 3] isn't interesting
in any way. This resembles a previous change to stop passing
`1 == 1` in the `vector<bool>` tests.)
llvm-svn: 346910
This patch renames the cxx-benchmark-unittests to check-cxx-benchmarks
and converts the target to use LIT in order to make the tests run faster
and provide better output.
In particular this runs each benchmark in a suite one by one, allowing
more parallelism while ensuring output isn't garbage with multiple threads.
Additionally, it adds the CMake flag '-DLIBCXX_BENCHMARK_TEST_ARGS=<list>'
to specify what options are passed when running the benchmarks.
llvm-svn: 346888
Summary:
P1006 adds support for constexpr in the specialization of pointer_traits
for raw pointers. This is necessary in order to use pointer_traits in
the upcoming constexpr containers. We expect P1006 to be voted into the
working draft for C++20 at the San Diego meeting.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53867
llvm-svn: 346764
This patch adds tests to ensure that multiset/unordered_multiset's emplace
method correctly constructs the elements without any intervening
constructions.
llvm-svn: 346743
Summary:
This fixes an regression when using bionic introduced in r345173.
I need to follow up and figure out what exactly is implied by
TEST_HAS_C11_FEATURES and see what the correct configuration is for
bionic (new versions should have everything the tests care about,
versions that predate C11 certainly don't), but this gets the tests
back to the old behavior.
Reviewers: EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mclow.lists, christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53956
llvm-svn: 345900
This reverts r345525. I'm reverting because that patch apparently caused
a regression on certain platforms (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D53994).
Since we don't fully understand the reasons for the regression, I'm
reverting until we can provide a fix we understand.
llvm-svn: 345893
This commit adds a merge member function to all the map and set containers,
which splices nodes from the source container. This completes support for
P0083r3.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48896
llvm-svn: 345744
The types/comparators passed to std::upper_bound and std::lower_bound
are not required to provided to provide an operator</comp(...) which
accepts the arguments in reverse order. Nor are the ranges required
to have a strict weak ordering.
However, in debug mode we attempted to check the result of a comparison
with the arguments reversed, which may not compiler.
This patch removes the use of the debug comparator for upper_bound
and lower_bound.
equal_range et al still use debug comparators when they call
__upper_bound and __lower_bound.
See llvm.org/PR39458
llvm-svn: 345434
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345281
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345214
This reverts commits r333103 and r333108. _Float16 and __fp16 are C11
extensions and compilers other than Clang don't define these for C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53670
llvm-svn: 345199
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
llvm-svn: 345148
The test is trying to avoid saying aligned_alloc on Windows' UCRT, which does not (and can not) implement aligned_alloc. However, it's testing for c1xx, meaning clang on Windows will fail this test when using the UCRT.
llvm-svn: 344829
In this example, the ctor of G runs in the main thread in the expression G(), and also in the copy ctor of G() in the DECAY_COPY inside std::thread. The main thread destroys the G() instance at the semicolon, and the started thread destroys the G() after it returns. Thus there is a race between the threads on the n_alive variable.
The fix is to join with the background thread before attempting to destroy the G in the main thread.
llvm-svn: 344820
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
While __cplusplus was only used a few dozen times, TEST_STD_VAR is used
more than 2000 times. So we replace the former by the latter for
consistency in the tests. There should be no functional change.
llvm-svn: 344194
Summary:
Scoped capabilities need to be annotated as such, otherwise the thread
safety analysis won't work as intended.
Fixes PR39234.
Reviewers: ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53049
llvm-svn: 344096
PR38682 added a test to check for a race condition in std::future.
Part of the fix is part of the dylib, but there is no released version
of mac OS X that ships a dylib containing the fix. Hence, this test can
(and sometimes does) when testing on OS X. This commit marks the test
as unsupported to avoid spurious failures.
llvm-svn: 344053
Debian build bots are running Clang 4, which apparently does not support
the "deprecated" attribute properly. Clang pretends to support the attribute,
but the attribute doesn't do anything.
(live example: https://wandbox.org/permlink/0De69aXns0t1D59r)
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand why we're even running the
libc++ tests under Clang-4. Is this a configuration we support? I can
understand that libc++ should _build_ with Clang 4, but it's not clear
to me that new libc++ headers should be usable under older compilers
like that.
llvm-svn: 342854
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
One of the SIMD tests attempted to left shift a value by 42, which
is UB when the left hand side is a 32 bit integer type.
This patch adjusts the test to use the value 4 instead of 42.
llvm-svn: 342820
In rL342814, i have committed a blind fix to unbreak the asan buildbot,
but as it was later discussed, the leak is intentional,
so we can not fix the failure that way.
So this reverts the leak 'fix',
and simply disables the test in the presence of ASAN.
llvm-svn: 342819
Summary:
The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where
function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the
C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`.
However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17.
Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more
liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`.
For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The
extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended
applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms:
1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the
standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one.
2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion,
applied to entities never declared as such by the standard.
Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using
additional macros.
Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer
dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For
example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`.
Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled
by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`.
This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev),
then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF
Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179
llvm-svn: 342808
This reverts r342566 as it causes on bots linker errors like
> Undefined symbols for architecture i386:
> "std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(std::nullptr_t)", referenced from:
llvm-svn: 342599
type.
Libc++ correctly asserts that a set of visitors for a variant all
return the same type. However, we use the visitation machinary to
perform relational operations. This causes a static assertion when
some of the alternatives relops return a UDT which is implicitly
convertible to bool instead of 'bool' exactly.
llvm-svn: 342560
Summary:
This commit fixes a regression introduced in r316095, where we don't match
inverted character classes when there's no negated characrers in the []'s.
rdar://problem/43060054
Reviewers: mclow.lists, timshen, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50534
llvm-svn: 340609
Summary:
The state associated to the future was set in one thread (with synchronization)
but read in another thread without synchronization, which led to a data race.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38181
rdar://problem/42548261
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51170
llvm-svn: 340608
It looks like this test XPASSes when the deployment target is older than
the OS of the system the test is running on. It looks like we run the
tests with -mmacosx-version-min=10.12, and that makes the test expect to
fail, but it passes.
llvm-svn: 340427
These algorithms require a ForwardIterator or better. Ensure
we diagnose the contract violation at compile time instead of
of silently doing the wrong thing.
Further algorithms will be audited in upcoming patches.
llvm-svn: 340426
Summary:
When a seed sequence would lead to having no non-zero significant bits
in the initial state of a `mersenne_twister_engine`, the fallback is to
flip the most significant bit of the first value that appears in the
textual representation of the initial state.
rand.eng.mers describes this as setting the value to be 2 to the power
of one less than w; the previous value encoded in the implementation,
namely one less than "2 to the power of w", is replaced by the correct
value in this patch.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, jasonliu
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mclow.lists, jasonliu, EricWF, christof, ldionne, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50736
llvm-svn: 339969
Because FreeBSD uses _M in its <sys/types.h>, and it is hard to avoid
including that header, only define _M to NASTY_MACRO for other operating
systems. This fixes almost 2000 unexpected test failures.
Discussed with Eric Fiselier.
llvm-svn: 339794
Summary:
Since r338934, Clang emits an error when aligned allocation functions are
used in conjunction with a system libc++ dylib that does not support those
functions. This causes some tests to fail when testing against older libc++
dylibs. This commit marks those tests as UNSUPPORTED, and also documents the
various reasons for the tests being unsupported.
Reviewers: vsapsai, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, mclow.lists, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50341
llvm-svn: 339743
Summary:
Those tests are breaking the test bots. A Bugzilla has been filed to
make sure those tests are re-enabled: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38572
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: krytarowski, christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50748
llvm-svn: 339742
Summary:
The macro was not defined in C++11 mode when it should have been, at least
according to how _LIBCPP_HAS_C11_FEATURES is defined.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, jfb, dexonsmith
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50719
llvm-svn: 339702
Summary:
These #includes are quite important, since otherwise any
#if TEST_STD_VER > 14 && defined(TEST_HAS_C11_FEATURES)
checks are always false, and so we don't actually test for C11 support
in the standard library.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50674
llvm-svn: 339675
Summary:
The current code enables aligned allocation functions when compiling in C++17
and later. This is a problem because aligned allocation functions might not
be supported on the target platform, which leads to an error at link time.
Since r338934, Clang knows not to define __cpp_aligned_new when it's not
available on the target platform -- this commit takes advantage of that to
only use aligned allocation functions when they are available.
Reviewers: vsapsai, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, EricWF, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50344
llvm-svn: 339431
(Still pending review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D47400 which has been open since may; will ask for forgiveness rather than permission :) )
llvm-svn: 339214
I'm not sure if libcxx is asserting UTF-8 here; but on Windows the full char value is always passed through in its entirety, since the default codepage is something like Windows-1252. The replacement character is only used for non-chars there; and that should be a more portable test everywhere.
(Still pending review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D47395 which has been open since may; will ask for forgiveness rather than permission :) )
llvm-svn: 339213
Michal Gorny