__declspec(restrict) and __attribute(malloc) are both handled
identically by clang: they are allowed to the noalias LLVM attribute.
Seeing as how noalias models the C99 notion of 'restrict', rename the
internal clang attribute to Restrict from Malloc.
llvm-svn: 228120
list-initialization that gets converted to some form other than an
InitListExpr. CXXTemporaryObjectExpr is a special case here, because it
represents a fused CXXFunctionalCastExpr + CXXConstructExpr. That, in
itself, is probably a design error...
llvm-svn: 227377
infinite recursion.
Also guard against said infinite recursion by adding an assert that will
trigger if CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr is called before a previous call to
CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr returns (i.e. if the TreeTransform run by
CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr calls a sequence of methods that
end up calling CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr, as the new test case had done
prior to this commit). Fixes PR22292.
llvm-svn: 227368
Under certain circumstances, the identifier mentioned in the diagnostic
won't match the intended correction even though the replacement
expression and the note pointing to the decl are both correct.
Basically, the TreeTransform assumes the TypoExpr's Consumer points to
the correct TypoCorrection, but the handling of typos that appear to be
ambiguous from the point of view of TransformTypoExpr would cause that
assumption to be violated by altering the Consumer's correction stream.
This fix allows the Consumer's correction stream to be reset to the
right TypoCorrection after successfully resolving the percieved ambiguity.
Included is a fix to suppress correcting the RHS of an assignment to the
LHS of that assignment for non-C++ code, to prevent a regression in
test/SemaObjC/provisional-ivar-lookup.m.
This fixes PR22297.
llvm-svn: 227251
In particular, remove the OpaqueExpr transformation from r225389 and
move the correction of the conditional from CheckConditionalOperands to
ActOnConditionalOp before the OpaqueExpr is created. This fixes the
typo correction behavior in C code that uses the GNU extension for a
binary ?: (without an expression between the "?" and the ":").
llvm-svn: 227220
transform.
Also diagnose typos in the initializer of an invalid C++ declaration.
Both issues were hit using the same line of test code, depending on
whether the code was treated as C or C++.
Fixes PR22092.
llvm-svn: 225389
Turning our _Atomic L-value into an R-value removes its _Atomic-ness.
However, we didn't update our 'FromType' which made
ScalarTypeToBooleanCastKind think we were trying to pass it a
non-scalar.
This fixes PR21836.
llvm-svn: 224322
We don't yet support pointer-to-member template arguments that have undergone
pointer-to-member conversions, mostly because we don't have a mangling for them yet.
llvm-svn: 222807
GCC and ICC both reject this and the 'Runtime-sized arrays with
automatic storage duration' (N3639) paper forbade this as well.
Previously, we would crash on our way to mangling.
This fixes PR21632.
llvm-svn: 222569
If there is more than one TypoExpr within the expr being transformed and
any but the last TypoExpr seen don't have any viable candidates, the
tree transform will be aborted early and the remaining TypoExprs are
never seen and hence never diagnosed. This adds a simple
RecursiveASTVisitor to find all of the TypoExprs to be diagnosed in the
case where typo correction of the entire expr fails (and the result of
the tree transform is an ExprError).
llvm-svn: 222465
The default handling is extended to properly create member expressions
and Objective-C ivar references.
Also detect and reject cases where multiple corrections have identical
correction distances and are valid, instead of suggesting the first one
that is found.
llvm-svn: 222462
Summary:
Ok, here is somewhat addition to D6217 aiming to preserve old darwin behavior wrt the typedefed types. The actual change to SemaChecking turned out to be pretty gross, in particular:
1. We need to extract the typedef'ed type for proper diagnostics
2. We need to walk over paren expressions as well
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6256
llvm-svn: 222044
Summary:
Consider the following nifty 1 liner: (0 ? csqrtl(2.0f) : sqrtl(2.0f)). One can easily obtain such code from e.g. tgmath. Right now it produces an assertion because we fail to do the promotion real => _Complex real.
The case was properly handled previously (old handleOtherComplexFloatConversion routine), but was forgotten in the current version. This seems to be about fallout from r219557
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6217
llvm-svn: 221821
One takes an Expr* and the other is a simple wrapper that takes an
ExprResult instead, and handles checking whether the ExprResult is
invalid.
Additionally, allow an optional callback that is run on the full result
of the tree transform, for filtering potential corrections based on the
characteristics of the resulting expression once all of the typos have
been replaced.
llvm-svn: 221735
This includes adding the new TypoExpr-based lazy typo correction to
LookupMemberExprInRecord as an alternative to the existing eager typo
correction.
llvm-svn: 220698
Part of the infrastructure is a map from a TypoExpr to the Sema-specific
state needed to correct it, along with helpers to ease dealing with the
state.
The the typo count is propagated up the stack of
ExpressionEvaluationContextRecords when one is popped off of to
avoid accidentally dropping TypoExprs on the floor. For example,
the attempted correction of g() in test/CXX/class/class.mem/p5-0x.cpp
happens with an ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord that is popped off
the stack prior to ActOnFinishFullExpr being called and the tree
transform for TypoExprs being run.
llvm-svn: 220695
We build a NestedNameSpecifier that records the CXXRecordDecl in which
__super appeared. Name lookup is performed in all base classes of the
recorded CXXRecordDecl. Use of __super is allowed only inside class and
member function scope.
llvm-svn: 218484
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
Previously, assigning an inheritance model to a derived class would
trigger further assiginments to the various bases of the class. This
was done to fix a bug where we couldn't handle an implicit
base-to-derived conversion for pointers-to-members when the conversion
was ambiguous at an earlier point.
However, this is not how the MS scheme works. Instead, assign
inheritance models to *just* the class which owns to declaration we
ended up referencing.
N.B. This result is surprising in many ways. It means that it is
possible for a base to have a "larger" inheritance model than it's
derived classes. It also means that bases in the conversion path do not
get assigned a model.
struct A { void f(); void f(int); };
struct B : A {};
struct C : B {};
void f() { void (C::*x)() = &A::f; }
We can only begin to assign an inheritance model *after* we've seen the
address-of but *before* we've done the implicit conversion the more
derived pointer-to-member type. After that point, both 'A' and 'C' will
have an inheritance model but 'B' will not. Surprising, right?
llvm-svn: 215174
FunctionProtoType::ExtProtoInfo. Most of the users of these fields don't care
about the other ExtProtoInfo bits and just want to talk about the exception
specification.
llvm-svn: 214450
it through the normal TreeTransform logic for Exprs (which will strip off
implicit parts of the initialization and never re-create them).
llvm-svn: 213913
Richard Smith