When an Objective-C method implements a protocol requirement, do not
inherit any availability information from the protocol
requirement. Rather, check that the implementation is not less
available than the protocol requirement, as we do when overriding a
method that has availability. Fixes rdar://problem/22734745.
llvm-svn: 248949
of new warning for deprecated method call for receiver
of type 'id'. This addresses rdar://18960378 where
unintended warnings being issued.
llvm-svn: 221933
"protected scope" is very unhelpful here and actively confuses users. Instead,
simply state the nature of the problem in the diagnostic: we cannot jump from
here to there. The notes explain nicely why not.
llvm-svn: 217293
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
idiom that is used commonly in setters:
[backingValue autorelease];
backingValue = [newValue retain]; // in general a +1 assign
rdar://9914061
llvm-svn: 157347
migration error.
This is more trouble that it is worth; autoreleasing a value without holding on it
is a valid use-case, we should not "punish" correct code for the minority of
broken/fragile programs that depend on the behavior of -autorelease.
rdar://9914061
llvm-svn: 156999
CFBridgingRetain/CFBridgingRelease calls instead
of __bridge_retained/__bridge_transfer casts as preferred
way of moving cf objects to arc land. // rdar://10207950
llvm-svn: 149449
increasingly prevailing case to the point that new features
like ARC don't even support the fragile ABI anymore.
This required a little bit of reshuffling with exceptions
because a check was assuming that ObjCNonFragileABI was
only being set in ObjC mode, and that's actually a bit
obnoxious to do.
Most, though, it involved a perl script to translate a ton
of test cases.
Mostly no functionality change for driver users, although
there are corner cases with disabling language-specific
exceptions that we should handle more correctly now.
llvm-svn: 140957
that, after migration, the object that was passed to 'setDelegate:' will not be properly retained, e.g:
-whatever {
id x = [[MyDoHicky alloc] init];
[someivar setDelegate: x]; // x won't get retained in ARC.
}
-dealloc {
[[someivar delegate] release]; // give migration error here.
}
rdar://8858009
llvm-svn: 135327
An unused autorelease is badness. If we remove it the receiver
will likely die immediately while previously it was kept alive
by the autorelease pool. This is bad practice in general, so leave it
and emit an error to force the user to restructure his code.
rdar://9599884
llvm-svn: 135193
cast type has no ownership specified, implicitly "transfer" the ownership of the cast'ed type
to the cast type:
id x;
(NSString**)&x; // Casting as (__strong NSString**).
llvm-svn: 134275
Douglas Gregor