That patch adds checking into DWARFVerifier that the Skeleton
compilation unit does not have children.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71244
The shift amount operand can be provided in a general purpose
register so sink it. Flip the vdup and negate so the existing
patterns can be used for matching.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70841
Summary: AutoFDO compilation has two places that do inlining - the sample profile loader that does inlining with context sensitive profile, and the regular inliner as CGSCC pass. Ideally we want most inlining to come from sample profile loader as that is driven by context sensitive profile and also retains context sensitivity after inlining. However the reality is most of the inlining actually happens during regular inliner. To track the number of inline instances from sample profile loader and help move more inlining to sample profile loader, I'm adding statistics and optimization remarks for sample profile loader's inlining.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70584
No more hash collisions for memoperands. Now the MIRCanonicalization
pass shouldn't hit hash collisions when dealing with nearly identical
memory accessing instructions when their memoperands are in fact different.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71328
This has two main effects:
- Optimizes debug info size by saving 221.86 MB of obj file size in a
Windows optimized+debug build of 'all'. This is 3.03% of 7,332.7MB of
object file size.
- Incremental step towards decoupling target intrinsics.
The enums are still compact, so adding and removing a single
target-specific intrinsic will trigger a rebuild of all of LLVM.
Assigning distinct target id spaces is potential future work.
Part of PR34259
Reviewers: efriedma, echristo, MaskRay
Reviewed By: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71320
Soon Intrinsic::ID will be a plain integer, so this overload will not be
possible.
Rename both overloads to ensure that downstream targets observe this as
a build failure instead of a runtime failure.
Split off from D71320
Reviewers: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71381
This reverts commit 30038da15b. It causes
the stage2 thinLTO bot to fail with:
Assertion failed: (CU.getDIE(CalleeSP) && "Expected declaration subprogram DIE for callee")
rdar://57840415
The fp16 to larger than fp32 inserts an extend that need to
re-legalized if fp16 is promoted. But if we check for fp16
promotion first, then we can avoid emiting the fp_extend all
together.
This is the initial patch for the OpenMP-IR-Builder, as discussed on the
mailing list ([1] and later) and at the US Dev Meeting'19.
The design is similar to D61953 but:
- in a non-WIP status, with proper documentation and working.
- using a OpenMPKinds.def file to manage lists of directives, runtime
functions, types, ..., similar to the current Clang implementation.
- restricted to handle only (simple) barriers, to implement most
`#pragma omp barrier` directives and most implicit barriers.
- properly hooked into Clang to be used if possible (D69922).
- compatible with the remaining code generation.
Parts have been extracted into D69853.
The plan is to have multiple people working on moving logic from Clang
here once the initial scaffolding (=this patch) landed.
[1] http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/2019-May/000197.html
Reviewers: kiranchandramohan, ABataev, RaviNarayanaswamy, gtbercea, grokos, sdmitriev, JonChesterfield, hfinkel, fghanim
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, bollu, guansong, jfb, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, penzn, ppenzin
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69785
This is equivalent to the existing `import_name` and `import_module`
attributes which control the import names in the final wasm binary
produced by lld.
This maps the existing
This attribute currently requires a string rather than using the
symbol name for a couple of reasons:
1. Avoid confusion with static and dynamic linking which is
based on symbol name. Exporting a function from a wasm module using
this directive is orthogonal to both static and dynamic linking.
2. Avoids name mangling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70520
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40846.
This adds a combine for cases where a (a + b) < a style overflow
check is performed, but with a + b being the result of
uadd.with.overflow, so the overflow result is also already available
and we can just use it. Subsequently GVN/CSE will deduplicate the extracts.
We can run into this situation if you have both a uadd.with.overflow
and a manual add + overflow check in the same function (on the same
operands), in which case GVN will rewrite the add to the with.overflow
result and leave you with this pattern.
The implementation is a bit ugly because I'm handling the various
canonicalization edge cases.
This does not yet handle the negated version of this pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58644
If the pointer was loaded/stored before the null check, the check
is redundant and can be removed. For now the optimizers do not
remove the nullptr check, see https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/H2r5GG.
The patch allows to use more nonnull constraints. Also, it found
one more optimization in some PowerPC test. This is my first llvm
review, I am free to any comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71177
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44236. This code was
originally introduced in rG36512330041201e10f5429361bbd79b1afac1ea1.
However, the attribute copying was done in the wrong place (in general
call replacement, not thunk generation) and a proper fix was
implemented in D12581.
Previously this code was just unnecessary but harmless (because
FunctionComparator ensured that the attributes of the two functions
are exactly the same), but since byval was changed to accept a type
this copying is actively wrong and may result in malformed IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71173
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets
to show the problem more generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some
value is free to negate, but that use count can change as we
rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression(). So something
that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation
phase becomes not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or
the inverse - something that was not free becomes free).
This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that
everything in an expression that is negatible to be handled
in the corresponding code within getNegatedExpression().
This patch skips the use check during the rewrite phase.
So we determine that some expression isNegatibleForFree
(identically to without this patch), but during the rewrite,
don't rely on use counts to decide how to create the optimal
expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
Summary:
The current da printer shows the dependence without indicating
which instructions are being considered as the src vs dst. It
also silently ignores call instructions, despite the fact that
they create confused dependence edges to other memory
instructions. This patch addresses these two issues plus a
couple of minor non-functional improvements.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: dmgreen, fhahn, philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dmgreen, fhahn
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71088
Before z14, we did not have any FMA instruction for 128-bit
floating-point, so the @llvm.fma.f128 intrinsic needs to be
expanded to a libcall on those platforms.
This worked correctly for regular FMA, but was implemented
incorrectly for the strict version. This was not noticed
because we did not have test coverage for this case.
This patch fixes that incorrect expansion and adds the
missing test cases.
Summary:
This patch adds a method to determine if a loop is in rotated form (the latch is
an exiting block). It also modifies the getLoopGuardBranch method to use this
new method. This method can also be used in Loopfusion. Once this patch lands I
will make the corresponding changes there.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, Whitney, fhahn, hfinkel
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65958
This simplifies code where no extra details are required
Also don't write out detail when it is empty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71347
There are a few places that check specific string attributes have
particular values, and assert if they are something else. The verifier
should catch these kinds of cases.
In some cases, we can rename a store operand, in order to enable pairing
of stores. For store pairs, that cannot be merged because the first
tored register is defined in between the second store, we try to find
suitable rename register.
First, we check if we can rename the given register:
1. The first store register must be killed at the store, which means we
do not have to rename instructions after the first store.
2. We scan backwards from the first store, to find the definition of the
stored register and check all uses in between are renamable. Along
they way, we collect the minimal register classes of the uses for
overlapping (sub/super)registers.
Second, we try to find an available register from the minimal physical
register class of the original register. A suitable register must not be
1. defined before FirstMI
2. between the previous definition of the register to rename
3. a callee saved register.
We use KILL flags to clear defined registers while scanning from the
beginning to the end of the block.
This triggers quite often, here are the top changes for MultiSource,
SPEC2000, SPEC2006 compiled with -O3 for iOS:
Metric: aarch64-ldst-opt.NumPairCreated
Program base patch diff
test-suite...nch/fourinarow/fourinarow.test 2.00 39.00 1850.0%
test-suite...s/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk.test 46.00 80.00 73.9%
test-suite...chmarks/Olden/power/power.test 70.00 96.00 37.1%
test-suite...cations/hexxagon/hexxagon.test 29.00 39.00 34.5%
test-suite...nchmarks/McCat/05-eks/eks.test 100.00 132.00 32.0%
test-suite.../Trimaran/enc-rc4/enc-rc4.test 46.00 59.00 28.3%
test-suite...T2006/473.astar/473.astar.test 160.00 200.00 25.0%
test-suite.../Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5.test 8.00 10.00 25.0%
test-suite...telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm.test 113.00 139.00 23.0%
test-suite...ediabench/gsm/toast/toast.test 113.00 139.00 23.0%
test-suite...Source/Benchmarks/sim/sim.test 91.00 111.00 22.0%
test-suite...C/CFP2000/179.art/179.art.test 41.00 49.00 19.5%
test-suite...peg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode.test 245.00 279.00 13.9%
test-suite...marks/Olden/health/health.test 16.00 18.00 12.5%
test-suite...ks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl.test 90.00 101.00 12.2%
test-suite...fice-ispell/office-ispell.test 91.00 100.00 9.9%
test-suite...oxyApps-C/miniGMG/miniGMG.test 430.00 465.00 8.1%
test-suite...lowfish/security-blowfish.test 39.00 42.00 7.7%
test-suite.../Applications/spiff/spiff.test 42.00 45.00 7.1%
test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 2473.00 2646.00 7.0%
test-suite.../VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes.test 29.00 31.00 6.9%
test-suite...nch/beamformer/beamformer.test 220.00 235.00 6.8%
test-suite...CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa.test 2110.00 2252.00 6.7%
test-suite...ve-susan/automotive-susan.test 109.00 116.00 6.4%
test-suite...s-C/unix-smail/unix-smail.test 65.00 69.00 6.2%
test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test 1194.00 1265.00 5.9%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/nbench/nbench.test 472.00 500.00 5.9%
test-suite...oxyApps-C/miniAMR/miniAMR.test 248.00 262.00 5.6%
test-suite...quoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk.test 18.00 19.00 5.6%
test-suite...rks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 7331.00 7710.00 5.2%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test 5651.00 5938.00 5.1%
test-suite...ternal/HMMER/hmmcalibrate.test 750.00 788.00 5.1%
test-suite...T2006/456.hmmer/456.hmmer.test 764.00 802.00 5.0%
test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test 1028.00 1079.00 5.0%
test-suite...CFP2006/444.namd/444.namd.test 1368.00 1434.00 4.8%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 4471.00 4685.00 4.8%
test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 3122.00 3271.00 4.8%
test-suite...pplications/oggenc/oggenc.test 1497.00 1565.00 4.5%
test-suite...T2000/300.twolf/300.twolf.test 742.00 774.00 4.3%
test-suite.../Prolangs-C/loader/loader.test 24.00 25.00 4.2%
test-suite...0.perlbench/400.perlbench.test 1983.00 2058.00 3.8%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 4612.00 4785.00 3.8%
test-suite...yApps-C++/PENNANT/PENNANT.test 995.00 1032.00 3.7%
test-suite...arks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.test 54.00 56.00 3.7%
Reviewers: efriedma, thegameg, samparker, dmgreen, paquette, evandro
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70450
The Isa register is a uint8_t, but at least on Windows this is
internally an unsigned char, which meant that prior to this patch it got
formatted as an ASCII character, rather than a decimal number. This
patch fixes this by casting it to a uint64_t before printing. I did it
this way instead of using a uint8_t formatter because a) it is simpler,
and b) it allows us to change the internal type of Isa in the future
without this code breaking.
I also took the opportunity to test the printing of the other standard
opcodes.
Reviewed by: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71274
Summary: Rollback of parts of D71213. After digging more into the code I think we should leave 0 when creating the instructions (CreateMemcpy, CreateMaskedStore, CreateMaskedLoad). It's probably fine for MemorySanitizer because Alignement is resolved but I'm having a hard time convincing myself it has no impact at all (although tests are passing).
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71332
Summary:
These allow you to get and set the operator of a dag node, without
affecting its list of arguments.
`!getop` is slightly fiddly because in many contexts you need its
return value to have a static type more specific than 'any record'. It
works to say `!cast<BaseClass>(!getop(...))`, but it's cumbersome, so
I made `!getop` take an optional type suffix itself, so that can be
written as the shorter `!getop<BaseClass>(...)`.
Reviewers: hfinkel, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71191
Summary:
Adds the following intrinsics:
- llvm.aarch64.sve.ldnt1
- llvm.aarch64.sve.stnt1
This patch creates masked loads and stores with the
MONonTemporal flag set when used with the intrinsics above.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, paulwalker-arm, dancgr, mgudim, efriedma, rengolin
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: tschuett, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71000
After creating a low-overhead loop, the loop update instruction was still
lingering around hurting performance. This removes dead loop update
instructions, which in our case are mostly SUBS instructions.
To support this, some helper functions were added to MachineLoopUtils and
ReachingDefAnalysis to analyse live-ins of loop exit blocks and find uses
before a particular loop instruction, respectively.
This is a first version that removes a SUBS instruction when there are no other
uses inside and outside the loop block, but there are some more interesting
cases in test/CodeGen/Thumb2/LowOverheadLoops/mve-tail-data-types.ll which
shows that there is room for improvement. For example, we can't handle this
case yet:
..
dlstp.32 lr, r2
.LBB0_1:
mov r3, r2
subs r2, #4
vldrh.u32 q2, [r1], #8
vmov q1, q0
vmla.u32 q0, q2, r0
letp lr, .LBB0_1
@ %bb.2:
vctp.32 r3
..
which is a lot more tricky because r2 is not only used by the subs, but also by
the mov to r3, which is used outside the low-overhead loop by the vctp
instruction, and that requires a bit of a different approach, and I will follow
up on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71007
This adds the family of `vshlq_n` and `vshrq_n` ACLE intrinsics, which
shift every lane of a vector left or right by a compile-time
immediate. They mostly work by expanding to the IR `shl`, `lshr` and
`ashr` operations, with their second operand being a vector splat of
the immediate.
There's a fiddly special case, though. ACLE specifies that the
immediate in `vshrq_n` can take values up to //and including// the bit
size of the vector lane. But LLVM IR thinks that shifting right by the
full size of the lane is UB, and feels free to replace the `lshr` with
an `undef` half way through the optimization pipeline. Hence, to keep
this legal in source code, I have to detect it at codegen time.
Logical (unsigned) right shifts by the element size are handled by
simply emitting the zero vector; arithmetic ones are converted into a
shift of one bit less, which will always give the same output.
In order to do that check, I also had to enhance the tablegen
MveEmitter so that it can cope with converting a builtin function's
operand into a bare integer to pass to a code-generating subfunction.
Previously the only bare integers it knew how to handle were flags
generated from within `arm_mve.td`.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM
Subscribers: echristo, hokein, rdhindsa, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71065
Summary:
In the function `EarlyIfPredicator::shouldConvertIf()`, we call
`TII->isProfitableToIfCvt()` with `BranchProbability::getUnknown()`, it may
cause the potential assertion error for those hook which use `BranchProbability`
in `isProfitableToIfCvt()`, for example `SystemZ`.
`SystemZ` use `Probability < BranchProbability(1, 8))` in the function
`SystemZInstrInfo::isProfitableToIfCvt()`, if we call this function with
`BranchProbability::getUnknown()`, it will cause assertion error.
This patch is to fix the potential bug.
Reviewed By: ThomasRaoux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71273
This iterator range just includes physical registers and register masks,
which are interesting when dealing with register liveness.
Reviewers: evandro, t.p.northover, paquette, MatzeB, arsenm
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70562
PowerPC has instruction to do the semantics of this piece of code:
vector int foo(vector int m, vector int n) {
return (m + n + 1) >> 1;
}
This patch is adding the match rule to select it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71002
I think this is no longer needed. The system should take care
of legalizing any new nodes that are added. I think this might
have been needed prior to r371709 or r307053.
Now, flags will result in differing hashes for a given MI. In effect, if
you have two instructions with everything identical except for their
flags then you should get two different hashes and fewer collisions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70479
Summary: This is a follow up of D69281, it enables the X86 backend support for the FP comparision.
Reviewers: uweigand, kpn, craig.topper, RKSimon, cameron.mcinally, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke, LiuChen3
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70582
Alexey Lapshin