This is the first step at implementing <format>. It adds the <format> header
and implements the `format_error`. class.
Implemnts parts of:
-P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, miscco, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92214
By encoding ABI-affecting properties in the name of the ABI list, it
makes it clear when an ABI list test should or should not be available,
and what results we should expect.
Note that we clearly don't encode all ABI-affecting parameters in the
name right now -- I just ported over what we supported in the code that
was there previously. As we encounter configurations that we wish to
support but produce different ABI lists, we can add those to the ABI
identifier and start supporting them.
This commit also starts checking the ABI list in the CI jobs that run
a supported configuration. Eventually, all configurations should have
a generated ABI list and the test should even run implicitly as part of
the Lit test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92194
We don't actually update the ABI lists at every release -- it's too much
work, since we'd technically have to do it even for minor releases.
Furthermore, I don't think anybody uses those (I certainly don't rely
on them for anything).
Instead, it is better to rely on the ABI list changelog and the canonical
ABI list that we always keep up to date. If one wants to know what symbols
were shipped in a specific release, that can be discovered easily using
Git, which is a superior tool than keeping textual copies of old versions.
The `posix_memalign@GLIBC_2.2.5` symbol can't have been added by r284206,
because it doesn't show up in the corresponding ABI list. It's also not
defined in libc++, so that wouldn't make sense. It must have made it into
that comment by mistake.
This commit adds new explicit instantiations for some classes in <iostream>
in the library. This is done after noticing that many programs that use
streams end up containing weak definitions of these classes, which has a
negative impact on both code size and load times (due to the need to
resolve weak symbols at load time). Note that we are just adding the
additional explicit instantiations for the `char` specializations, since
the `wchar_t` specializations are not used as often, and as a result there
wouldn't be a clear benefit.
This change is not an ABI break, since we are just adding additional
symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90677
Instead of having to remember the command-line to use every time, this
commit adds a CMake target to generate the ABI list in the current
configuration, if it is supported.
As a fly-by change, remove scripts that are now unused (sym_match.py
and sym_extract.py).
Previously, we would define new/delete in both libc++ and libc++abi.
Not only does this cause code bloat, but also it's technically an ODR
violation since we don't know which operator will be selected. Furthermore,
since those are weak definitions, we should strive to have as few of them
as possible (to improve load times).
My preferred choice would have been to put the operators in libc++ only
by default, however that would create a circular dependency between
libc++ and libc++abi, which GNU linkers don't handle.
Folks who want to ship new/delete in libc++ instead of libc++abi are
free to do so by turning on LIBCXX_ENABLE_NEW_DELETE_DEFINITIONS at
CMake configure time.
On Apple platforms, this shouldn't be an ABI break because we re-export
the new/delete symbols from libc++abi. This change actually makes libc++
behave closer to the system libc++ shipped on Apple platforms.
On other platforms, this is an ABI break for people linking against libc++
but not libc++abi. However, vendors have been consulted in D68269 and no
objection was raised. Furthermore, the definitions can be controlled to
appear in libc++ instead with the CMake option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68269
Instead of managing two copies of the symbol lists, reuse the same list
in libc++abi and libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88623
We previously tried re-exporting symbols that didn't exist when
exceptions were disabled. Note that building libc++abi without
exceptions still doesn't work when linking against the default-provided
libSystem.dylib, because it transitively depends on libobjc.dylib,
and that requires __gxx_personality_v0. But building libc++abi
with exceptions and libc++ without exceptions does work.
- Avoid using C++11-and-later features in <atomic>:
Historically, we've supported <atomic> in C++03, so we can't use C++11
features in that header. This is something we really need to change,
since our implementation of <atomic> is starting to accumulate technical
debt because of that.
- Mark a test as unsupported on single threaded systems
- Add missing symbols to the Linux ABI list
- Add the new symbols to the ABI list on Darwin
- Add XFAIL markup to the tests that require dylib support on older platforms
- Add availability markup for back-deployment
libc++ ABI v1 provides three valarray symbols as part of the shared library:
valarray<size_t>::valarray(size_t)
valarray<size_t>::~valarray()
valarray<size_t>::resize(size_t, size_t)
The first two of these are intended to be removed in V2 of the ABI: they're
attributed _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1, and it appears that the intention
is that these symbols from the library are not used even when building using
the V1 ABI. However, there are explicit instantiation declarations for all
three symbols in the header, which are not correct as we do not intend to find
an instantiation of these functions that is provided elsewhere.
(A recent change to clang to properly diagnose explicit instantiation
declarations of internal linkage functions -- required by [temp.explicit]p13 --
had to be rolled back because it diagnosed these explicit instantiations.)
Remove the explicit instantiation declarations, and remove the explicit
instantiation definitions for V2 of the libc++ ABI onwards.
llvm-svn: 359243
Summary:
Ensure we re-export __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length and
__cxa_uncaught_exceptions from libc++, since they are now
provided by libc++abi.
Doing this allows us to stop linking explicitly against libc++abi in
the libc++abi tests, since libc++ re-exports all the necessary symbols.
However, there is one caveat to that. We don't want libc++ to re-export
__cxa_uncaught_exception (the singular form), since it's only provided
for backwards compatibility. Hence, for the single test where we check
this backwards compatibility, we explicitly link against libc++abi.
PR27405
PR22654
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60424
llvm-svn: 358690
Summary:
This patch treats <filesystem> as a first-class citizen of the dylib,
like all other sub-libraries (e.g. <chrono>). As such, it also removes
all special handling for installing the filesystem library separately
or disabling part of the test suite from the lit command line.
Unlike the previous attempt (r356500), this doesn't remove all the
filesystem tests.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jfb, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152
llvm-svn: 356518
When I applied r356500 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152), I somehow
deleted all of filesystem's tests. I will revert r356500 and re-apply
it properly.
llvm-svn: 356505
Summary:
This patch treats <filesystem> as a first-class citizen of the dylib,
like all other sub-libraries (e.g. <chrono>). As such, it also removes
all special handling for installing the filesystem library separately
or disabling part of the test suite from the lit command line.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jfb, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152
llvm-svn: 356500
Summary:
The reason libc++ implemented a throwing debug mode handler was for ease of testing. Specifically,
I thought that if a debug violation aborted, we could only test one violation per file. This made
it impossible to test debug mode. Which throwing behavior we could test more!
However, the throwing approach didn't work either, since there are debug violations underneath noexcept
functions. This lead to the introduction of `_NOEXCEPT_DEBUG`, which was only noexcept when debug
mode was off.
Having thought more and having grown wiser, `_NOEXCEPT_DEBUG` was a horrible decision. It was
viral, it didn't cover all the cases it needed to, and it was observable to the user -- at worst
changing the behavior of their program.
This patch removes the throwing debug handler, and rewrites the debug tests using 'fork-ing' style
death tests.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne, thomasanderson
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, arphaman, libcxx-commits, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59166
llvm-svn: 356417
Summary:
This patch fixes a lifetime bug when inserting a new container into the debug database. It is
diagnosed by UBSAN when debug mode is enabled. This patch corrects how nodes are constructed
during insertion.
The fix requires unconditionally breaking the debug mode ABI. Users should not expect ABI
stability from debug mode.
Reviewers: ldionne, serge-sans-paille, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mclow.lists, christof, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58011
llvm-svn: 355367
Different versions of python print dictionaries in different orders.
This can mess up diffs when updating ABI lists. This patch uses
pprint.pformat to print the dicts to get a consistent ordering.
llvm-svn: 353634
The itoa symbols were added and their addition is documented in the CHANGELOG.
I'm not sure why the valarray symbols were missing previously, but they're
present in the v1 ABI lists and should be here as well.
llvm-svn: 353633
Summary:
std::bad_array_length was added by n3467, but this never made it into C++.
This commit removes the definition of std::bad_array_length from the headers
AND from the shared library. See the comments in the ABI changelog for details
about the ABI implications of this change.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, dexonsmith, howard.hinnant, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54804
llvm-svn: 347903
Summary:
This commit marks a few functions as hidden and removes them from the ABI list
on Linux such that libc++ can be built with -fvisibility=hidden. The functions
marked as hidden by this patch were exported from the shared object only
because they were implicitly instantiated function templates. It is safe
to stop exporting those symbols from the shared object because nobody could
actually depend on them: implicit instantiations are not taken from shared
objects.
The symbols removed in this commit are basically the same that had been
removed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D53868, but that patch had to be reverted
because it broke the build (because the functions were not marked as hidden
like this patch does).
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54639
llvm-svn: 347395
Summary:
This change changes the build to use -fvisibility=hidden
The exports this patch removes are symbols that should have never been exported
by the dylib in the first place, and should all be symbols which the linker
won't de-duplicate across SO boundaries, making them safe to remove.
After this change, we should be able to apply `_LIBCPP_HIDDEN` to the versioning namespace without changing the export lists.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: smeenai, mgorny, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53868
llvm-svn: 345664
Summary:
When building with -fvisibility=hidden, some symbols do not get exported from
libc++.dylib. This means that some entities are not explicitly given default
visibility in the source code, and that we rely on the fact -fvisibility=default
is the default. This commit explicitly gives default visibility to those
symbols to avoid being dependent on the command line flags used.
The commit also remove symbols from the dylib -- those symbols do not
actually need to be exported from the dylib and this should not be an
ABI break.
Finally, in the future, we may want to mark the whole std:: namespace as
having hidden visibility (to switch from opt-out to opt-in), in which
case the changes done in this commit will be required.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52662
llvm-svn: 345260
Summary:
r342805 added support for the check-cxx-abilist target on FreeBSD, but broke
the target on macOS in doing so. The problem is that the GENERIC_TARGET_TRIPLE
gets overwritten after replacing the FreeBSD regular expression, which
nullifies the replacement done with the darwin regular expression.
Reviewers: dim, EricWF
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, krytarowski, christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52394
llvm-svn: 342813
Summary:
They are introduced in r338479; their Linux ABI changes are recorded in r338486.
TODO: Record the Mac OS X ABI changes.
Reviewers: EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52391
llvm-svn: 342810
numbers off of freebsd target triples, when generating the name of the
ABI list file for check-cxx-abilist target.
Also remove unnecessary parentheses in the regex for darwin, and
slightly reword the comment.
llvm-svn: 342805
Summary:
This macro allows hiding symbols from the ABI when the library is built
with an ABI version after ABI v1, which is currently the only stable ABI.
This commit defines `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY` to be
`_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1`, meaning that symbols that were only
exported by the library for historical reasons are not exported anymore
in the unstable ABI.
Because of that, this commit is an ABI break for ABI v2. This ABI version
is not stable, however, so this should not be a problem.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49914
llvm-svn: 339012
Mark de Wever