An array T[1] isn't necessarily the same say when it's
a member of a struct. This patch addresses that problem and corrects
the tests to deal with it.
llvm-svn: 324545
Summary:
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR35491 and LWG2157 (https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2157)
The fix attempts to maintain ABI compatibility by replacing the array with a instance of `aligned_storage`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: lichray, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41223
llvm-svn: 324526
Revert "Fix initialization of array<const T, 0> with GCC."
Revert "Make array<const T, 0> non-CopyAssignable and make swap and fill ill-formed."
This reverts commit r324182, r324185, and r324194 which were causing issues with zero-length std::arrays.
llvm-svn: 324309
Previously, when handling zero-sized array of const objects we
used a const version of aligned_storage_t, which is not an array type.
However, GCC complains about initialization of the form: array<const T, 0> arr = {};
This patch fixes that bug by making the dummy object used to represent
the zero-sized array an array itself. This avoids GCC's complaints
about the uninitialized const member.
llvm-svn: 324194
The standard isn't exactly clear how std::array should handle zero-sized arrays
with const element types. In particular W.R.T. copy assignment, swap, and fill.
This patch takes the position that those operations should be ill-formed,
and makes changes to libc++ to make it so.
This follows up on commit r324182.
llvm-svn: 324185
Summary:
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR35491 and LWG2157 (https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2157)
The fix attempts to maintain ABI compatibility by replacing the array with a instance of `aligned_storage`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: lichray, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41223
llvm-svn: 324182
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
Summary:
There is no reason to guard `tuple_size`, `tuple_element` and `get<I>(...)` for pair and array inside of `<__tuple>` so that they are only available when we have variadic templates.
This requires there be redundant declarations and definitions. It also makes it easy to get things wrong.
For example the following code should compile (and does in c++11).
```
#define _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS
#include <array>
int main()
{
static_assert((std::tuple_size<std::array<int, 10> volatile>::value == 10), "");
}
```
This patch lifts the non-variadic parts of `tuple_size`, `tuple_types`, and `get<I>(...)` to the top of `<__tuple>` where they don't require variadic templates. This patch also removes `<__tuple_03>` because there is no longer a need for it.
Reviewers: danalbert, K-ballo, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7774
llvm-svn: 232492
The patch touches these files:
locale
array
deque
new
string
utility
vector
__bit_reference
__split_buffer
locale_win32.h
There is no intended functionality change and it is expected that reversing the position of the inline keyword with regard to the other keywords does not change the meaning of anything, least not for apple/Linux etc.
It is intended to make libcxx more consistent with itself and to prevent the 1000 or so
"inline.cpp(3) : warning C4141: 'inline' : used more than once" warnings that MS's cl.exe compiler emits without this patch, i.e. if inline is not the first keyword before a function name etc.
Prefer "inline [other inline related keyword]" over "[other related keyword] inline".
After this patch, libcxx should be consistent to this pattern.
llvm-svn: 191987
Marshall Clow