Commit Graph

874 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Douglas Gregor f8f868336e Allow the use of default template arguments when forming a class
template specialization (e.g., std::vector<int> would now be
well-formed, since it relies on a default argument for the Allocator
template parameter). 

This is much less interesting than one might expect, since (1) we're
not actually using the default arguments for anything important, such
as naming an actual Decl, and (2) we'll often need to instantiate the
default arguments to check their well-formedness. The real fun will
come later.

llvm-svn: 64310
2009-02-11 18:16:40 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 0ada9f5d46 Rename Sema::hasSameType to QualType::isSameAs
Rename Sema::hasSameUnqualifiedType to QualType::isSameIgnoringQalifiers

llvm-svn: 64307
2009-02-11 16:47:37 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 0e55853639 Implement semantic checking for template arguments that correspond to
pointer-to-member-data non-type template parameters. Also, get
consistent about what it means to returned a bool from
CheckTemplateArgument.

llvm-svn: 64305
2009-02-11 16:16:59 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 6f233ef1d8 Add semantic checking for template arguments that correspond to
non-type template parameters that are references to functions or
pointers to member functions. Did a little bit of refactoring so that
these two cases, along with the handling of non-type template
parameters that are pointers to functions, are handled by the same
path. 

Also, tweaked FixOverloadedFunctionReference to cope with member
function pointers. This is a necessary step for getting all of the fun
member pointer conversions working outside of template arguments, too.

llvm-svn: 64277
2009-02-11 01:18:59 +00:00
Douglas Gregor a9faa44162 Semantic checking for template arguments that correspond to non-type
template parameters that have reference type. Effectively, we're doing
a very limited form of reference binding here.

llvm-svn: 64270
2009-02-11 00:44:29 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 3a7796bccc Add partial semantic checking of template arguments that are meant for
non-type template parameters of pointer-to-object and
pointer-to-function type. The most fun part of this is the use of
overload resolution to pick a function from the set of overloaded
functions that comes in as a template argument.

Also, fixed two minor bugs in this area:
  - We were allowing non-type template parameters of type pointer to
  void.
  - We weren't patching up an expression that refers to an overloaded
  function set via "&f" properly.

We're still not performing complete checking of the expression to be
sure that it is referring to an object or function with external
linkage (C++ [temp.arg.nontype]p1).

llvm-svn: 64266
2009-02-11 00:19:33 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 86560404fc Add type-checking and implicit conversions for template parameters of
integral or enumeration type.

llvm-svn: 64256
2009-02-10 23:36:10 +00:00
Douglas Gregor dba326363c Implement parsing, semantic analysis and ASTs for default template
arguments. This commit covers checking and merging default template
arguments from previous declarations, but it does not cover the actual
use of default template arguments when naming class template
specializations.

llvm-svn: 64229
2009-02-10 19:49:53 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 8133879c5e Semantic analysis for non-type template parameter declarations.
llvm-svn: 64223
2009-02-10 17:43:50 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 97f34576d4 Teach the type-id/expression disambiguator about different
disambiguation contexts, so that we properly parse template arguments
such as

  A<int()>

as type-ids rather than as expressions. Since this can be confusing
(especially when the template parameter is a non-type template
parameter), we try to give a friendly error message.

Almost, eliminate a redundant error message (that should have been a
note) and add some ultra-basic checks for non-type template
arguments.

llvm-svn: 64189
2009-02-10 00:53:15 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 85e0f66250 Check template template arguments against their corresponding template
template parameters.

llvm-svn: 64188
2009-02-10 00:24:35 +00:00
Douglas Gregor d32e028f79 Rudimentary checking of template arguments against their corresponding
template parameters when performing semantic analysis of a template-id
naming a class template specialization.

llvm-svn: 64185
2009-02-09 23:23:08 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 67b556a0da Eliminate TemplateArg so that we only have a single kind of
representation for template arguments. Also simplifies the interface
for ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization and eliminates some annoying
allocations of TemplateArgs.

My attempt at smart pointers for template arguments lists is
relatively lame. We can improve it once we're sure that we have the
right representation for template arguments.

llvm-svn: 64154
2009-02-09 19:34:22 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 8bf4205c70 Start processing template-ids as types when the template-name refers
to a class template. For example, the template-id 'vector<int>' now
has a nice, sugary type in the type system. What we can do now:

  - Parse template-ids like 'vector<int>' (where 'vector' names a
    class template) and form proper types for them in the type system.
  - Parse icky template-ids like 'A<5>' and 'A<(5 > 0)>' properly,
    using (sadly) a bool in the parser to tell it whether '>' should
    be treated as an operator or not.

This is a baby-step, with major problems and limitations:
  - There are currently two ways that we handle template arguments
  (whether they are types or expressions). These will be merged, and,
  most likely, TemplateArg will disappear.
  - We don't have any notion of the declaration of class template
  specializations or of template instantiations, so all template-ids
  are fancy names for 'int' :)

llvm-svn: 64153
2009-02-09 18:46:07 +00:00
Douglas Gregor cd72ba97e7 Semantic checking for class template declarations and
redeclarations. For example, checks that a class template
redeclaration has the same template parameters as previous
declarations.

Detangled class-template checking from ActOnTag, whose logic was
getting rather convoluted because it tried to handle C, C++, and C++
template semantics in one shot.

Made some inroads toward eliminating extraneous "declaration does not
declare anything" errors by adding an "error" type specifier.

llvm-svn: 63973
2009-02-06 22:42:48 +00:00
Douglas Gregor ded2d7b021 Basic representation of C++ class templates, from Andrew Sutton.
llvm-svn: 63750
2009-02-04 19:02:06 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 2ada048975 Some name-lookup-related fixes, from Piotr Rak!
- Changes Lookup*Name functions to return NamedDecls, instead of
Decls. Unfortunately my recent statement that it will simplify lot of
code, was not quite right, but it simplifies some...
- Makes MergeLookupResult SmallPtrSet instead of vector, following
Douglas suggestions.
- Adds %qN format for printing qualified names to Diagnostic.
- Avoids searching for using-directives in Scopes, which are not
DeclScope, during unqualified name lookup.

llvm-svn: 63739
2009-02-04 17:27:36 +00:00
Douglas Gregor ed8f288708 Eliminated LookupCriteria, whose creation was causing a bottleneck for
LookupName et al. Instead, use an enum and a bool to describe its
contents.

Optimized the C/Objective-C path through LookupName, eliminating any
unnecessarily C++isms. Simplify IdentifierResolver::iterator, removing
some code and arguments that are no longer used.

Eliminated LookupDeclInScope/LookupDeclInContext, moving all callers
over to LookupName, LookupQualifiedName, or LookupParsedName, as
appropriate.

All together, I'm seeing a 0.2% speedup on Cocoa.h with PTH and
-disable-free. Plus, we're down to three name-lookup routines.

llvm-svn: 63354
2009-01-30 01:04:22 +00:00
Steve Naroff dcfe56d489 Refactor Sema::LookupDecl() into 2 functions: LookupDeclInScope() and LookupDeclInContext().
The previous interface was very confusing. This is much more explicit, which will be easier to understand/optimize/convert.

The plan is to eventually deprecate both of these functions. For now, I'm focused on performance.

llvm-svn: 63256
2009-01-29 00:07:50 +00:00
Douglas Gregor b9bd8a994c Keep track of template arguments when we parse them. Right now, we don't actually do anything with the template arguments, but they'll be used to create template declarations
llvm-svn: 61413
2008-12-24 02:52:09 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 55ad91fecb Ultrasimplistic sketch for the parsing of C++ template-ids. This won't
become useful or correct until we (1) parse template arguments
correctly, (2) have some way to turn template-ids into types,
declarators, etc., and (3) have a real representation of templates.

llvm-svn: 61208
2008-12-18 19:37:40 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 5daeee2bd6 Move Sema::isTemplateParameterDecl to Decl::isTemplateParameter, where it belongs
llvm-svn: 60708
2008-12-08 18:40:42 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 4619e439b6 Introduce basic support for dependent types, type-dependent
expressions, and value-dependent expressions. This permits us to parse
some template definitions.

This is not a complete solution; we're missing type- and
value-dependent computations for most of the expression types, and
we're missing checks for dependent types and type-dependent
expressions throughout Sema.

llvm-svn: 60615
2008-12-05 23:32:09 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 5101c24f60 Representation of template type parameters and non-type template
parameters, with some semantic analysis:
  - Template parameters are introduced into template parameter scope
  - Complain about template parameter shadowing (except in Microsoft mode)

Note that we leak template parameter declarations like crazy, a
problem we'll remedy once we actually create proper declarations for
templates. 

Next up: dependent types and value-dependent/type-dependent
expressions.

llvm-svn: 60597
2008-12-05 18:15:24 +00:00