Summary:
This addresses a regression in common handling from the new LTO
API in r278338. Only create a new common if the size is different.
The type comparison against an array type fails when the size is
different but not an array. GlobalMerge does not handle the
array types as well and we lose some global merging opportunities.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: junbuml, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23955
llvm-svn: 279911
Summary:
Have the cache pass back the path to the cache entry when it
is ready to be loaded, instead of a buffer.
For gold-plugin we can simply pass this file back to gold directly,
which avoids expensive writing of a separate tmp file. Ensure
the cache entry is not deleted on cleanup by adjusting the setting
of the IsTemporary flags.
Moved the loading of the buffer into llvm-lto2 to maintain current
behavior.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23946
llvm-svn: 279883
Add the ability to plug a cache on the LTO API.
I tried to write such that a linker implementation can
control the cache backend. This is intrusive and I'm
not totally happy with it, but I can't figure out a
better design right now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23599
llvm-svn: 279576
Summary:
I assume there was a use case, so maybe this strawman patch will help
clarifying if it is legit.
In any case the current situation is not legit: a ThinLTO compilation
should not trigger an unexpected full LTO compilation.
Right now, adding a --save-temps option triggers this and makes the
number of output differs.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: pcc, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23600
llvm-svn: 279550
An important performance setting on the LLVMContext for LTO is
enableDebugTypeODRUniquing(), this adds an automatic merging of
debug information in the context based on type ids.
Also, the lto::Config includes a diagnostic handler that needs to
be set on the Context, as well as the setDiscardValueNames() setting.
llvm-svn: 279532
It use to be non-const for the sole purpose of custom handling of
commons symbol. This is moved now in the regular LTO handling now
and such we can constify the callback.
llvm-svn: 279438
The gold-plugin was doing this internally, now the API is handling
commons correctly based on the given resolution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23739
llvm-svn: 279417
directly produce the index as the value type result.
This requires making the index movable which is straightforward. It
greatly simplifies things by allowing us to completely avoid the builder
API and the layers of abstraction inherent there. Instead both pass
managers can directly construct these when run by value. They still
won't be constructed truly eagerly thanks to the optional in the legacy
PM. The code that directly builds the index can also just share a direct
function.
A notable change here is that the result type of the analysis for the
new PM is no longer a reference type. This was really problematic when
making changes to how we handle result types to make our interface
requirements *much* more strict and precise. But I think this is an
overall improvement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23701
llvm-svn: 279216
Summary:
This was reversed compared to ThinLTOCodeGenerator for some reason,
and lead to an increased code-size on my tests. I figured that the
weak resolution may internalize a linkonce function, which will be
promoted immediately (and renamed), before being internalized again.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: pcc, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23632
llvm-svn: 279021
Summary:
It does not play well with directories (end up with a bunch of hidden
files).
Also, do not strip the 0 suffix for the first task, especially since
0 can be used by ThinLTO as well now.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, pcc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23612
llvm-svn: 279014
Summary:
While NFC for now, this will allow more flexibility on the client side
to hold state necessary to back up the stream.
Also when adding caching, this class will grow in complexity.
Note I blindly modified the gold-plugin as I can't compile it.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23542
llvm-svn: 278907
Summary:
Multiple APIs were taking a StringMap for the ImportLists containing
the entries for for all the modules while operating on a single entry
for the current module. Instead we can pass the desired ModuleImport
directly. Also some of the APIs were not const, I believe just to be
able to use operator[] on the StringMap.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23537
llvm-svn: 278776
Summary:
Fixed a bug in ThinLTOCodeGenerator's temp file dumping. The Twine
needs to be passed directly as an argument, or a copy saved into a
std::string.
It doesn't seem there are any consumers of this, so I added a new option
to llvm-lto to enable saving of temp files during ThinLTO, and augmented
a test to use it to check post-import but pre-opt bitcode.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23525
llvm-svn: 278761
This restores commit r278330, with fixes for a few bot failures:
- Fix a late change I had made to the save temps output file that I
missed due to existing files sitting on my disk
- Fix a bunch of Windows bot failures with "ambiguous call to overloaded
function" due to confusion between llvm::make_unique vs
std::make_unique (preface the new make_unique calls with "llvm::")
- Attempt to fix a modules bot failure by adding a missing include
to LTO/Config.h.
Original change:
Resolution-based LTO API.
Summary:
This introduces a resolution-based LTO API. The main advantage of this API over
existing APIs is that it allows the linker to supply a resolution for each
symbol in each object, rather than the combined object as a whole. This will
become increasingly important for use cases such as ThinLTO which require us
to process symbol resolutions in a more complicated way than just adjusting
linkage.
Patch by Peter Collingbourne.
Reviewers: rafael, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: lhames, tejohnson, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20268
llvm-svn: 278338
This reverts commit r278330.
I made a change to the save temps output that is causing issues with the
bots. Didn't realize this because I had older output files sitting on
disk in my test output directory.
llvm-svn: 278331
Summary:
This introduces a resolution-based LTO API. The main advantage of this API over
existing APIs is that it allows the linker to supply a resolution for each
symbol in each object, rather than the combined object as a whole. This will
become increasingly important for use cases such as ThinLTO which require us
to process symbol resolutions in a more complicated way than just adjusting
linkage.
Patch by Peter Collingbourne.
Reviewers: rafael, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: lhames, tejohnson, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20268
Address review comments
llvm-svn: 278330
We currently do not touch a symbol's linkage in the case where a definition
has a single copy. However, this code is effectively unnecessary: either
the definition is not exported, in which case the internalize phase sets
its linkage to internal, or it is exported, in which case we need to promote
linkage to weak. Those two cases are already handled by existing code.
I believe that the only real functional change here is in the case where we
have a single definition which does not prevail (e.g. because the definition
in a native object file prevails). In that case we now lower linkage to
available_externally following the existing code path for that case.
As a result we can remove the isExported function parameter from the
thinLTOResolveWeakForLinkerInIndex function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21883
llvm-svn: 274784
This check is not only unnecessary, it can produce the wrong result. If we
are linking a single module and it has an exported linkonce symbol, we need
to promote to weak in order to avoid PR19901-style problems.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21917
llvm-svn: 274722
* UpdateCompilerUsed() -> updateCompilerUsed()
* ThinLTO doesn't use the API so we can remove the include
* Clean up unused #include <functional> from the header
* Rename #ifdef guard comment to be correct.
llvm-svn: 273461
This is indeed a much cleaner approach (thanks to Daniel Berlin
for pointing out), and also David/Sean for review.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21454
llvm-svn: 273032
Daniel Berlin expressed some real concerns about the port and proposed
and alternative approach. I'll revert this for now while working on a
new patch, which I hope to put up for review shortly. Sorry for the churn.
llvm-svn: 272925
Nearly all the changes to this pass have been done while maintaining and
updating other parts of LLVM. LLVM has had another pass, SROA, which
has superseded ScalarReplAggregates for quite some time.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21316
llvm-svn: 272737
The need for all these Lookup* functions is just because of calls to
getAnalysis inside methods (i.e. not at the top level) of the
runOnFunction method. They should be straightforward to clean up when
the old PM is gone.
llvm-svn: 272615
Below are my super rough notes when porting. They can probably serve as
a basic guide for porting other passes to the new PM. As I port more
passes I'll expand and generalize this and make a proper
docs/HowToPortToNewPassManager.rst document. There is also missing
documentation for general concepts and API's in the new PM which will
require some documentation.
Once there is proper documentation in place we can put up a list of
passes that have to be ported and game-ify/crowdsource the rest of the
porting (at least of the middle end; the backend is still unclear).
I will however be taking personal responsibility for ensuring that the
LLD/ELF LTO pipeline is ported in a timely fashion. The remaining passes
to be ported are (do something like
`git grep "<the string in the bullet point below>"` to find the pass):
General Scalar:
[ ] Simplify the CFG
[ ] Jump Threading
[ ] MemCpy Optimization
[ ] Promote Memory to Register
[ ] MergedLoadStoreMotion
[ ] Lazy Value Information Analysis
General IPO:
[ ] Dead Argument Elimination
[ ] Deduce function attributes in RPO
Loop stuff / vectorization stuff:
[ ] Alignment from assumptions
[ ] Canonicalize natural loops
[ ] Delete dead loops
[ ] Loop Access Analysis
[ ] Loop Invariant Code Motion
[ ] Loop Vectorization
[ ] SLP Vectorizer
[ ] Unroll loops
Devirtualization / CFI:
[ ] Cross-DSO CFI
[ ] Whole program devirtualization
[ ] Lower bitset metadata
CGSCC passes:
[ ] Function Integration/Inlining
[ ] Remove unused exception handling info
[ ] Promote 'by reference' arguments to scalars
Please let me know if you are interested in working on any of the passes
in the above list (e.g. reply to the post-commit thread for this patch).
I'll probably be tackling "General Scalar" and "General IPO" first FWIW.
Steps as I port "Deduce function attributes in RPO"
---------------------------------------------------
(note: if you are doing any work based on these notes, please leave a
note in the post-commit review thread for this commit with any
improvements / suggestions / incompleteness you ran into!)
Note: "Deduce function attributes in RPO" is a module pass.
1. Do preparatory refactoring.
Do preparatory factoring. In this case all I had to do was to pull out a static helper (r272503).
(TODO: give more advice here e.g. if pass holds state or something)
2. Rename the old pass class.
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp
Rename class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs -> ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPass
in preparation for adding a class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs as the pass in the new PM.
(edit: actually wait what? The new class name will be
ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass, so it doesn't conflict. So this step is
sort of useless churn).
llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
llvm/lib/LTO/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/IPO.cpp
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp
Rename initializeReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass -> initializeReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPassPass
(note that the "PassPass" thing falls out of `s/ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrs/ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsLegacyPass/`)
Note that the INITIALIZE_PASS macro is what creates this identifier name, so renaming the class requires this renaming too.
Note that createReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass does not need to be
renamed since its name is not generated from the class name.
3. Add the new PM pass class.
In the new PM all passes need to have their
declaration in a header somewhere, so you will often need to add a header.
In this case
llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h is already there because
PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass was already ported.
The file-level comment from the .cpp file can be used as the file-level
comment for the new header. You may want to tweak the wording slightly
from "this file implements" to "this file provides" or similar.
Add declaration for the new PM pass in this header:
class ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass
: public PassInfoMixin<ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass> {
public:
PreservedAnalyses run(Module &M, AnalysisManager<Module> &AM);
};
Its name should end with `Pass` for consistency (note that this doesn't
collide with the names of most old PM passes). E.g. call it
`<name of the old PM pass>Pass`.
Also, move the doxygen comment from the old PM pass to the declaration of
this class in the header.
Also, include the declaration for the new PM class
`llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h` at the top of the file (in this case,
it was already done when the other pass in this file was ported).
Now define the `run` method for the new class.
The main things here are:
a) Use AM.getResult<...>(M) to get results instead of `getAnalysis<...>()`
b) If the old PM pass would have returned "false" (i.e. `Changed ==
false`), then you should return PreservedAnalyses::all();
c) In the old PM getAnalysisUsage method, observe the calls
`AU.addPreserved<...>();`.
In the case `Changed == true`, for each preserved analysis you should do
call `PA.preserve<...>()` on a PreservedAnalyses object and return it.
E.g.:
PreservedAnalyses PA;
PA.preserve<CallGraphAnalysis>();
return PA;
Note that calls to skipModule/skipFunction are not supported in the new PM
currently, so optnone and optimization bisect support do not work. You can
just drop those calls for now.
4. Add the pass to the new PM pass registry to make it available in opt.
In llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilder.cpp add a #include for your header.
`#include "llvm/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.h"`
In this case there is already an include (from when
PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass was ported).
Add your pass to llvm/lib/Passes/PassRegistry.def
In this case, I added
`MODULE_PASS("rpo-functionattrs", ReversePostOrderFunctionAttrsPass())`
The string is from the `INITIALIZE_PASS*` macros used in the old pass
manager.
Then choose a test that uses the pass and use the new PM `-passes=...` to
run it.
E.g. in this case there is a test that does:
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -functionattrs -rpo-functionattrs -S | FileCheck %s
I have added the line:
; RUN: opt < %s -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='require<targetlibinfo>,cgscc(function-attrs),rpo-functionattrs' -S | FileCheck %s
The `-aa-pipeline=basic-aa` and
`require<targetlibinfo>,cgscc(function-attrs)` are what is needed to run
functionattrs in the new PM (note that in the new PM "functionattrs"
becomes "function-attrs" for some reason). This is just pulled from
`readattrs.ll` which contains the change from when functionattrs was ported
to the new PM.
Adding rpo-functionattrs causes the pass that was just ported to run.
llvm-svn: 272505
Summary:
Ensure we keep prevailing copy of LinkOnceAny by converting it to
WeakAny.
Rename odr_resolution test to the now more appropriate weak_resolution
(weak in the linker sense includes linkonce).
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20634
llvm-svn: 270850
Move the now index-based ODR resolution and internalization routines out
of ThinLTOCodeGenerator.cpp and into either LTO.cpp (index-based
analysis) or FunctionImport.cpp (index-driven optimizations).
This is to enable usage by other linkers.
llvm-svn: 270698
Davide Italiano