Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zaara Syeda 6535993625 Re-commit: [MachineLICM] Add functions to MachineLICM to hoist invariant stores
This patch adds functions to allow MachineLICM to hoist invariant stores.
Currently, MachineLICM does not hoist any store instructions, however
when storing the same value to a constant spot on the stack, the store
instruction should be considered invariant and be hoisted. The function
isInvariantStore iterates each operand of the store instruction and checks
that each register operand satisfies isCallerPreservedPhysReg. The store
may be fed by a copy, which is hoisted by isCopyFeedingInvariantStore.
This patch also adds the PowerPC changes needed to consider the stack
register as caller preserved.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40196

llvm-svn: 328326
2018-03-23 15:28:15 +00:00
Zaara Syeda 01f414baaa Revert [MachineLICM] This reverts commit rL327856
Failing build bots. Revert the commit now.

llvm-svn: 327864
2018-03-19 16:19:44 +00:00
Zaara Syeda ff05e2b0e6 [MachineLICM] Add functions to MachineLICM to hoist invariant stores
This patch adds functions to allow MachineLICM to hoist invariant stores.
Currently, MachineLICM does not hoist any store instructions, however
when storing the same value to a constant spot on the stack, the store
instruction should be considered invariant and be hoisted. The function
isInvariantStore iterates each operand of the store instruction and checks
that each register operand satisfies isCallerPreservedPhysReg. The store
may be fed by a copy, which is hoisted by isCopyFeedingInvariantStore.
This patch also adds the PowerPC changes needed to consider the stack
register as caller preserved.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40196

llvm-svn: 327856
2018-03-19 14:52:25 +00:00
Ehsan Amiri a538b0f023 Adding -verify-machineinstrs option to PowerPC tests
Currently we have a number of tests that fail with -verify-machineinstrs.
To detect this cases earlier we add the option to the testcases with the
exception of tests that will currently fail with this option. PR 27456 keeps
track of this failures.

No code review, as discussed with Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 277624
2016-08-03 18:17:35 +00:00
Hal Finkel af51993ee1 [PowerPC] Add r2 as an operand for all calls under both PPC64 ELF V1 and V2
Our PPC64 ELF V2 call lowering logic added r2 as an operand to all direct call
instructions in order to represent the dependency on the TOC base pointer
value. Restricting this to ELF V2, however, does not seem to make sense: calls
under ELF V1 have the same dependence, and indirect calls have an r2 dependence
just as direct ones. Make sure the dependence is noted for all calls under both
ELF V1 and ELF V2.

llvm-svn: 226432
2015-01-19 07:20:27 +00:00
Hal Finkel e2ab0f17cf [PowerPC] Loosen ELFv1 PPC64 func descriptor loads for indirect calls
Function pointers under PPC64 ELFv1 (which is used on PPC64/Linux on the
POWER7, A2 and earlier cores) are really pointers to a function descriptor, a
structure with three pointers: the actual pointer to the code to which to jump,
the pointer to the TOC needed by the callee, and an environment pointer. We
used to chain these loads, and make them opaque to the rest of the optimizer,
so that they'd always occur directly before the call. This is not necessary,
and in fact, highly suboptimal on embedded cores. Once the function pointer is
known, the loads can be performed ahead of time; in fact, they can be hoisted
out of loops.

Now these function descriptors are almost always generated by the linker, and
thus the contents of the descriptors are invariant. As a result, by default,
we'll mark the associated loads as invariant (allowing them to be hoisted out
of loops). I've added a target feature to turn this off, however, just in case
someone needs that option (constructing an on-stack descriptor, casting it to a
function pointer, and then calling it cannot be well-defined C/C++ code, but I
can imagine some JIT-compilation system doing so).

Consider this simple test:
  $ cat call.c

  typedef void (*fp)();
  void bar(fp x) {
    for (int i = 0; i < 1600000000; ++i)
      x();
  }

  $ cat main.c

  typedef void (*fp)();
  void bar(fp x);
  void foo() {}
  int main() {
    bar(foo);
  }

On the PPC A2 (the BG/Q supercomputer), marking the function-descriptor loads
as invariant brings the execution time down to ~8 seconds from ~32 seconds with
the loads in the loop.

The difference on the POWER7 is smaller. Compiling with:

  gcc -std=c99 -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c : ~6 seconds [this is 4.8.2]

  clang -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c : ~5.3 seconds

  clang -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c -mno-invariant-function-descriptors : ~4 seconds
  (looks like we'd benefit from additional loop unrolling here, as a first
   guess, because this is faster with the extra loads)

The -mno-invariant-function-descriptors will be added to Clang shortly.

llvm-svn: 226207
2015-01-15 21:17:34 +00:00