Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
QingShan Zhang f8f9af7ba5 [PowerPC] Add a peephole post RA to transform the inst that fed by add
If the arch is P8, we will select XFLOAD to load the floating point, and then, expand it to vsx and non-vsx X-form instruction post RA. This patch is trying to convert the X-form to D-form if it meets the requirement that one operand of the x-form inst is the special Zero register, and another operand fed by add inst. i.e.
y = add imm, reg
LFDX. 0, y
-->
LFD imm(reg)

Reviewers: Nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49007

llvm-svn: 340149
2018-08-20 02:52:55 +00:00
QingShan Zhang 9f0fe9a3f8 If the arch is P9, we will select the DFLOADf32/DFLOADf64 pseudo instruction when we are loading a floating,
and expand it post RA basing on the register pressure. However, we miss to do the add-imm peephole for these pseudo instruction.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47568
Reviewed By: Nemanjai

llvm-svn: 335024
2018-06-19 06:54:51 +00:00
Lei Huang f4ec67822f [PowerPC] Remove the match pattern in the definition of LXSDX/STXSDX
The match pattern in the definition of LXSDX is xoaddr, so the Pseudo
instruction XFLOADf64 never gets selected. XFLOADf64 expands to LXSDX/LFDX post
RA based on the register pressure. To avoid ambiguity, we need to remove the
select pattern for LXSDX, same as what was done for LXSD. STXSDX also have
the same issue.

Patch by Qing Shan Zhang (steven.zhang).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47178

llvm-svn: 333150
2018-05-24 03:20:28 +00:00
Nemanja Ivanovic 6354d23555 [Power9] Exploit D-Form VSX Scalar memory ops that target full VSX register set
This patch corresponds to review:

The newly added VSX D-Form (register + offset) memory ops target the upper half
of the VSX register set. The existing ones target the lower half. In order to
unify these and have the ability to target all the VSX registers using D-Form
operations, this patch defines Pseudo-ops for the loads/stores which are
expanded post-RA. The expansion then choses the correct opcode based on the
register that was allocated for the operation.

llvm-svn: 283212
2016-10-04 11:25:52 +00:00
Ehsan Amiri a538b0f023 Adding -verify-machineinstrs option to PowerPC tests
Currently we have a number of tests that fail with -verify-machineinstrs.
To detect this cases earlier we add the option to the testcases with the
exception of tests that will currently fail with this option. PR 27456 keeps
track of this failures.

No code review, as discussed with Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 277624
2016-08-03 18:17:35 +00:00
Bill Schmidt 32e9c6465b [PPC] Adjust some PowerPC tests to account for presence/absence of VSX
Patch by Bill Seurer; committed on his behalf.

These test cases generate slightly different code sequences when VSX
is activated and thus fail. The update turns off VSX explicitly for
the existing checks and then adds a second set of checks for most of
them that test the VSX instruction output.

llvm-svn: 220019
2014-10-17 01:41:22 +00:00
Stephen Lin f799e3f944 Convert CodeGen/*/*.ll tests to use the new CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change and all tests pass after conversion.
This was done with the following sed invocation to catch label lines demarking function boundaries:
    sed -i '' "s/^;\( *\)\([A-Z0-9_]*\):\( *\)test\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3test\4:\5/g" test/CodeGen/*/*.ll
which was written conservatively to avoid false positives rather than false negatives. I scanned through all the changes and everything looks correct.

llvm-svn: 186258
2013-07-13 20:38:47 +00:00
Bill Schmidt f5b474c6c6 PPCDAGToDAGISel::PostprocessISelDAG()
This patch implements the PPCDAGToDAGISel::PostprocessISelDAG virtual
method to perform post-selection peephole optimizations on the DAG
representation.

One optimization is implemented here:  folds to clean up complex
addressing expressions for thread-local storage and medium code
model.  It will also be useful for large code model sequences when
those are added later.  I originally thought about doing this on the
MI representation prior to register assignment, but it's difficult to
do effective global dead code elimination at that point.  DCE is
trivial on the DAG representation.

A typical example of a candidate code sequence in assembly:

   addis 3, 2, globalvar@toc@ha
   addi  3, 3, globalvar@toc@l
   lwz   5, 0(3)

When the final instruction is a load or store with an immediate offset
of zero, the offset from the add-immediate can replace the zero,
provided the relocation information is carried along:

   addis 3, 2, globalvar@toc@ha
   lwz   5, globalvar@toc@l(3)

Since the addi can in general have multiple uses, we need to only
delete the instruction when the last use is removed.

llvm-svn: 175697
2013-02-21 00:38:25 +00:00