Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing
virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the
parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank,
%1(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
would now be written as
%1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the
registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise
and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the
registers block completely.
Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one
exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print
the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in
meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier
both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation
where we can print something we can't parse.
llvm-svn: 316479
This is in preparation for a verifier check that makes sure copies are
of the same size (when generic virtual registers are involved).
llvm-svn: 316387
This runs `udpate_mir_test_checks --add-vreg-checks` on the tests taht
are already more or less in the format that generates, so that there
will be less churn in some upcoming changes.
llvm-svn: 316139
If -simplify-mir option is passed then MIRPrinter will not print such fields.
This change also required some lit test cases in CodeGen directory to be changed.
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32304
llvm-svn: 304779
We used to only support instructions with same-type operands.
Instead, use the per-register type information to map each
operand more accurately.
llvm-svn: 281734
Puyan Lotfi