Summary:
Instead of just looking for a load which is mergable with Ext to form ExtLoad, trying to promote Exts as long as the cost is acceptable. This change is not a NFC as it continue promoting Exts even after finding a load during promotions; the change in arm64-codegen-prepare-extload.ll described in 2.b might show the case.
This change was motivated from D26524. Based on this change, I will move the transformation performed in aarch64-type-promotion into CGP.
Reviewers: jmolloy, qcolombet, mcrosier, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27853
llvm-svn: 298114
Splitting critical edges when one of the source edges is an indirectbr
is hard in general (because it requires changing the memory the indirectbr
reads). But if a block only has a single indirectbr predecessor (which is
the common case), we can simulate splitting that edge by splitting
the destination block, and retargeting the *direct* branches.
This is motivated by the use of computed gotos in python 2.7: PyEval_EvalFrame()
ends up using an indirect branch with ~100 successors, and passing a constant to
each of those. Since MachineSink can't break indirect critical edges on demand
(and doing this in MIR doesn't look feasible), this causes us to emit about ~100
defs of registers containing constants, which we in the predecessor block, where
only one of those constants is used in each successor. So, at each computed goto,
we needlessly spill about a 100 constants to stack. The end result is that a
clang-compiled python interpreter can be about ~2.5x slower on a simple python
reduction loop than a gcc-compiled interpreter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29916
llvm-svn: 296416
When we construct addressing modes, we use isNoopAddrSpaceCast to ignore
addrspacecast instructions. Make sure we insert the correct addrspacecast
when we reconstruct the addressing mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30114
llvm-svn: 296167
Splitting critical edges when one of the source edges is an indirectbr
is hard in general (because it requires changing the memory the indirectbr
reads). But if a block only has a single indirectbr predecessor (which is
the common case), we can simulate splitting that edge by splitting
the destination block, and retargeting the *direct* branches.
This is motivated by the use of computed gotos in python 2.7: PyEval_EvalFrame()
ends up using an indirect branch with ~100 successors, and passing a constant to
each of those. Since MachineSink can't break indirect critical edges on demand
(and doing this in MIR doesn't look feasible), this causes us to emit about ~100
defs of registers containing constants, which we in the predecessor block, where
only one of those constants is used in each successor. So, at each computed goto,
we needlessly spill about a 100 constants to stack. The end result is that a
clang-compiled python interpreter can be about ~2.5x slower on a simple python
reduction loop than a gcc-compiled interpreter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29916
llvm-svn: 296149
Splitting critical edges when one of the source edges is an indirectbr
is hard in general (because it requires changing the memory the indirectbr
reads). But if a block only has a single indirectbr predecessor (which is
the common case), we can simulate splitting that edge by splitting
the destination block, and retargeting the *direct* branches.
This is motivated by the use of computed gotos in python 2.7: PyEval_EvalFrame()
ends up using an indirect branch with ~100 successors, and passing a constant to
each of those. Since MachineSink can't break indirect critical edges on demand
(and doing this in MIR doesn't look feasible), this causes us to emit about ~100
defs of registers containing constants, which we in the predecessor block, where
only one of those constants is used in each successor. So, at each computed goto,
we needlessly spill about a 100 constants to stack. The end result is that a
clang-compiled python interpreter can be about ~2.5x slower on a simple python
reduction loop than a gcc-compiled interpreter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29916
llvm-svn: 296060
Summary:
Rework the code that was sinking/duplicating (icmp and, 0) sequences
into blocks where they were being used by conditional branches to form
more tbz instructions on AArch64. The new code is more general in that
it just looks for 'and's that have all icmp 0's as users, with a target
hook used to select which subset of 'and' instructions to consider.
This change also enables 'and' sinking for X86, where it is more widely
beneficial than on AArch64.
The 'and' sinking/duplicating code is moved into the optimizeInst phase
of CodeGenPrepare, where it can take advantage of the fact the
OptimizeCmpExpression has already sunk/duplicated any icmps into the
blocks where they are used. One minor complication from this change is
that optimizeLoadExt needed to be updated to always mark 'and's it has
determined should be in the same block as their feeding load in the
InsertedInsts set to avoid an infinite loop of hoisting and sinking the
same 'and'.
This change fixes a regression on X86 in the tsan runtime caused by
moving GVNHoist to a later place in the optimization pipeline (see
PR31382).
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: aemerson, mcrosier, sebpop, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28813
llvm-svn: 295746
Summary: This change prevent the signed value of cost from being negative as the value is passed as an unsigned argument.
Reviewers: mcrosier, jmolloy, qcolombet, javed.absar
Reviewed By: mcrosier, qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28871
llvm-svn: 293307
This is a succeeding patch of https://reviews.llvm.org/D22840 to address the
issue when a value to be merged into an int64 pair is in a different BB. Redoing
the store splitting in CodeGenPrepare so we can match the pattern across multiple
BBs and move some instructions into the same BB. We still keep the code in dag
combine so that we can catch cases that show up after DAG combining runs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25914
llvm-svn: 290365
We're currently doing nearly the same thing for @llvm.objectsize in
three different places: two of them are missing checks for overflow,
and one of them could subtly break if InstCombine gets much smarter
about removing alloc sites. Seems like a good idea to not do that.
llvm-svn: 290214
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block and unit test failures in AVR and WebAssembly :
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl
Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 289988
`dropUnknownNonDebugMetadata` takes a list of "known" metadata IDs. The
only reason it worked at all is that `getMetadataID` returns something
unrelated -- it returns the subclass ID of the receiver (which is used
in `dyn_cast` etc.). That does not numerically match
`LLVMContext::MD_invariant_group` and ends up dropping `invariant_group`
along with every other metadata that does not numerically match
`LLVMContext::MD_invariant_group`.
llvm-svn: 289973
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block:
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl
Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 289951
Instead, expose whether the current type is an array or a struct, if an array
what the upper bound is, and if a struct the struct type itself. This is
in preparation for a later change which will make PointerType derive from
Type rather than SequentialType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26594
llvm-svn: 288458
Summary:
Previously, CGP would unconditionally sink addrspacecast instructions,
even going so far as to sink them into a loop.
Now we check that the cast is "cheap", as defined by TLI.
We introduce a new "is-cheap" function to TLI rather than using
isNopAddrSpaceCast because some GPU platforms want the ability to ask
for non-nop casts to be sunk.
Reviewers: arsenm, tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26923
llvm-svn: 287591
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause
ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case
block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could
potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a
loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, davidxl
Subscribers: qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 287553
of which that is hidden inside a separate function call) and helpfully
before building expensive transaction infrastructure. This will avoid
crashing when running CGP in a generic mode if we ever managed to hit
this case.
Note that I spent some time looking at alternatives. CGP is actually
used without a TM or TLI in order to do some target-independent testing.
Further, all of the neighboring optimization techniques actually have
some paths that are effective even in the absence of TLI so this seemed
the correct scope at which to check and bypass logic. It still isn't
clear that long-term support for missing TM/TLI is the right
cost/benefit tradeoff for CGP -- we seem to get relatively little for it
and the code is just littered with checks (and assumptions which
I suspect are still missing some checks).
This at least fixes the potential bug in this code spotted by
PVS-Studio, so we've got that going for us. ;]
llvm-svn: 285987
Summary:
The original implementation is in r261607, which was reverted in r269726 to accomendate the ProfileSummaryInfo analysis pass. The new implementation:
1. add a new metadata for function section prefix
2. query against ProfileSummaryInfo in CGP to set the correct section prefix for each function
3. output the section prefix set by CGP
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman
Subscribers: vsk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24989
llvm-svn: 284533
CodeGenPrepare knows how to move a zext of a load into the same basic block
where the load lives. The goal is to help ISel match a zero-extending load
instead of two separated instructions.
CGP attempts to move a zext computation even if it lives in a basic block that
does not post-dominate the load's basic block. That means, the hoisted zext may
be speculated. Preserving the zext location would hurt the debugging experience
and the quality of sample pgo.
With this patch, when moving a zext near to its associated load, CGP no longer
propagates the zext's debug location. Instead, CGP conservatively reuses the
same debug location for the load and the zext.
An alternative approach would be to assign an artificial line-0 location to the
zext. However we don't want to over-use the 'line-0' for this particular case
because it would have a size cost in the line-table section for no additional
benefit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25611
llvm-svn: 284377
Summary: If consecutive select instructions are lowered separately in CGP, it will introduce redundant condition check and branches that cannot be removed by later optimization phases. This patch lowers all consecutive select instructions at the same to to avoid inefficent code as demonstrated in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=29095
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: vsk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24147
llvm-svn: 281252
CGP tail-duplicates rets into blocks that end with a call that feed the ret.
This puts the call in tail position, potentially allowing the DAG builder to
lower it as a tail call. To avoid tail duplication in cases where we won't
form the tail call, CGP tried to predict whether this is going to be possible,
and avoids doing it when lowering as a tail call will definitely fail.
However, it was being too conservative by always throwing away calls to
functions with a signext/zeroext attribute on the return type.
Instead, we can use the same logic the builder uses to determine whether the
attributes work out.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24315
llvm-svn: 280894
CGP currently drops select's MD_prof profile data when
generating conditional branch which can lead to bad
code layout. The patch fixes the issue.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24169
llvm-svn: 280600
Elsewhere (particularly computeKnownBits) we assume that a global will be
aligned to the value returned by Value::getPointerAlignment. This is used to
boost the alignment on memcpy/memset, so any target-specific request can only
increase that value.
llvm-svn: 275866
Also, rename recognizeBitReverseOrBSwapIdiom to recognizeBSwapOrBitReverseIdiom,
so the ordering of the MatchBSwaps and MatchBitReversals arguments are
consistent with the function name.
llvm-svn: 270715
The sink cast machinery is supposed to sink casts as close to their user
as possible. However, an EH pad is the first instruction in it's basic
block. Don't sink if the user is an EH pad.
This fixes PR27536.
llvm-svn: 267767
This is part of solving PR27344:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27344
CGP should undo the SimplifyCFG transform for the same reason that earlier patches have used this
same mechanism: it's possible that passes between SimplifyCFG and CGP may be able to optimize the
IR further with a select in place.
For the TLI hook default, >99% taken or not taken is chosen as the default threshold for a highly
predictable branch. Even the most limited HW branch predictors will be correct on this branch almost
all the time, so even a massive mispredict penalty perf loss would be overcome by the win from all
the times the branch was predicted correctly.
As a follow-up, we could make the default target hook less conservative by using the SchedMachineModel's
MispredictPenalty. Or we could just let targets override the default by implementing the hook with that
and other target-specific options. Note that trying to statically determine mispredict rates for
close-to-balanced profile weight data is generally impossible if the HW is sufficiently advanced. Ie,
50/50 taken/not-taken might still be 100% predictable.
Finally, note that this patch as-is will not solve PR27344 because the current __builtin_unpredictable()
branch weight default values are 4 and 64. A proposal to change that is in D19435.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19488
llvm-svn: 267572
The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267231
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267022
This patch fixes calculating of builtin_object_size if it depends on a
condition. Before this patch compiler did not know how to calculate the
object size when it finds a condition that cannot be eliminated.
This patch enables calculating of builtin_object_size even in case when
condition cannot be eliminated by choosing minimum or maximum value as a
result from condition. Choosing minimum or maximum value from condition
is based on the second argument of __builtin_object_size function.
Patch by Strahinja Petrovic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18438
llvm-svn: 266193
Jun Bum Lim