- The ODS description was using an old syntax that was updated during the review.
This fixes the ODS description to match the current syntax.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90797
- Eliminate duplicated information about mapping from memref -> its descriptor fields
by consolidating that mapping in two functions: getMemRefDescriptorFields and
getUnrankedMemRefDescriptorFields.
- Change convertMemRefType() and convertUnrankedMemRefType() to use these
functions.
- Remove convertMemrefSignature and convertUnrankedMemrefSignature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90707
Previously, linalg-bufferize was a "finalizing" bufferization pass (it
did a "full" conversion). This wasn't great because it couldn't be used
composably with other bufferization passes like std-bufferize and
scf-bufferize.
This patch makes linalg-bufferize a composable bufferization pass.
Notice that the integration tests are switched over to using a pipeline
of std-bufferize, linalg-bufferize, and (to finalize the conversion)
func-bufferize. It all "just works" together.
While doing this transition, I ran into a nasty bug in the 1-use special
case logic for forwarding init tensors. That logic, while
well-intentioned, was fundamentally flawed, because it assumed that if
the original tensor value had one use, then the converted memref could
be mutated in place. That assumption is wrong in many cases. For
example:
```
%0 = some_tensor : tensor<4xf32>
br ^bb0(%0, %0: tensor<4xf32>, tensor<4xf32>)
^bb0(%bbarg0: tensor<4xf32>, %bbarg1: tensor<4xf32>)
// %bbarg0 is an alias of %bbarg1. We cannot safely write
// to it without analyzing uses of %bbarg1.
linalg.generic ... init(%bbarg0) {...}
```
A similar example can happen in many scenarios with function arguments.
Even more sinister, if the converted memref is produced by a
`std.get_global_memref` of a constant global memref, then we might
attempt to write into read-only statically allocated storage! Not all
memrefs are writable!
Clearly, this 1-use check is not a local transformation that we can do
on the fly in this pattern, so I removed it.
The test is now drastically shorter and I basically rewrote the CHECK
lines from scratch because:
- the new composable linalg-bufferize just doesn't do as much, so there
is less to test
- a lot of the tests were related to the 1-use check, which is now gone,
so there is less to test
- the `-buffer-hoisting -buffer-deallocation` is no longer mixed in, so
the checks related to that had to be rewritten
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90657
When the "after" region of a WhileOp is merely forwarding its arguments back to
the "before" region, i.e. WhileOp is a canonical do-while loop, a simpler CFG
subgraph that omits the "after" region with its extra branch operation can be
produced. Loop rotation from general "while" to "if { do-while }" is left for a
future canonicalization pattern when it becomes necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90604
The lowering is a straightforward inlining of the "before" and "after" regions
connected by (conditional) branches. This plugs the WhileOp into the
progressive lowering scheme. Future commits may choose to target WhileOp
instead of CFG when lowering ForOp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90603
The new construct represents a generic loop with two regions: one executed
before the loop condition is verifier and another after that. This construct
can be used to express both a "while" loop and a "do-while" loop, depending on
where the main payload is located. It is intended as an intermediate
abstraction for lowering, which will be added later. This form is relatively
easy to target from higher-level abstractions and supports transformations such
as loop rotation and LICM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90255
* All functions that return an Operation now return an OpView.
* All functions that accept an Operation now accept an _OperationBase, which both Operation and OpView extend and can resolve to the backing Operation.
* Moves user-facing instance methods from Operation -> _OperationBase so that both can have the same API.
* Concretely, this means that if there are custom op classes defined (i.e. in Python), any iteration or creation will return the appropriate instance (i.e. if you get/create an std.addf, you will get an instance of the mlir.dialects.std.AddFOp class, getting full access to any custom API it exposes).
* Refactors all __eq__ methods after realizing the proper way to do this for _OperationBase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90584
This is useful in C source files where it is easy for a typo to be
silently assumed by the compiler to be an implicit declaration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90727
This delegate the control of the buffering to the user of the API. This
seems like a safer option as messages are immediately propagated to the
user, which may lead to less surprising behavior during debugging for
instance.
In terms of performance, a user can add a buffered stream on the other
side of the callback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90726
This is exposing the basic functionalities (create, nest, addPass, run) of
the PassManager through the C API in the new header: `include/mlir-c/Pass.h`.
In order to exercise it in the unit-test, a basic TableGen backend is
also provided to generate a simple C wrapper around the pass
constructor. It is used to expose the libTransforms passes to the C API.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90667
- Verify that attributes parsed using a custom parser do not have duplicates.
- If there are duplicated in the attribute dictionary in the input, they get caught during the
dictionary parsing.
- This check verifies that there is no duplication between the parsed dictionary and any
attributes that might be added by the custom parser (or when the custom parsing code
adds duplicate attributes).
- Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48025
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90502
Previously, they were only defined for `FuncOp`.
To support this, `FunctionLike` needs a way to get an updated type
from the concrete operation. This adds a new hook for that purpose,
called `getTypeWithoutArgsAndResults`.
For now, `FunctionLike` continues to assume the type is
`FunctionType`, and concrete operations that use another type can hide
the `getType`, `setType`, and `getTypeWithoutArgsAndResults` methods.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90363
The OpenMP dialect include is only needed for translation
and is not required in LLVM dialect.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90510
* Use function_ref instead of std::function in several methods
* Use ::get instead of ::getChecked for IntegerType.
- It is already fully verified and constructing a mlir::Location can be extremely costly during parsing.
BufferizeTests.
Summary:
Added test operations to replace the LinalgDialect dependency in tests
which use the buffer-deallocation, buffer-hoisting,
buffer-loop-hoisting, promote-buffers-to-stack,
buffer-placement-preparation-allowed-memref-resutls and
buffer-placement-preparation pass. Adapted the corresponding tests cases
and TestBufferPlacement.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90037
This is an error prone behavior, I frequently have ~20 min debugging sessions when I hit
an unexpected implicit nesting. This default makes the C++ API safer for users.
Depends On D90669
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90671
This simplifies a few parts of the pass manager, but in particular we don't add as many
verifierpass as there are passes in the pipeline, and we can now enable/disable the
verifier after the fact on an already built PassManager.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90669
This header was an initial early attempt at a crude C API for bindings,
but it isn't used and redundant with the new API. At this point it only
contributes to more confusion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90643
Because cstr operations allow more instruction reordering than asserts, we only
lower cstr_broadcastable to std ops with cstr_require. This ensures that the
more drastic lowering to asserts can happen specifically with the user's desire.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89325
This patch renames AffineParallelNormalize to AffineLoopNormalize to make it
more generic and be able to hold more loop normalization transformations in
the future for affine.for and affine.parallel ops. Eventually, it could also be
extended to support scf.for and scf.parallel. As a starting point for affine.for,
the patch also adds support for removing single iteration affine.for ops to the
the pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90267
This revision refactors the base Op/AbstractOperation classes to reduce the amount of generated code size when defining a new operation. The current scheme involves taking the address of functions defined directly on Op and Trait classes. This is problematic because even when these functions are empty/unused we still result in these functions being defined in the main executable. In this revision, we switch to using SFINAE and template type filtering to remove remove functions that are not needed/used. For example, if an operation does not define a custom `print` method we shouldn't define a templated `printAssembly` method for it. The same applies to parsing/folding/verification/etc. This dropped MLIR code size for a large downstream library by ~10%(~1 mb in an opt build).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90196
Looks like we have a blind spot in the testing matrix.
AsyncRegionRewriter.cpp: In member function ‘virtual void {anonymous}::GpuAsyncRegionPass::runOnFunction()’:
AsyncRegionRewriter.cpp:113:16: internal compiler error: in replace_placeholders_r, at cp/tree.c:2804
if (getFunction()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.getRegion()
~~~~~~~~~~~~
.walk(Callback{OpBuilder{&getContext()}})
~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Add standard dialect operations to define global variables with memref types and to
retrieve the memref for to a named global variable
- Extend unit tests to test verification for these operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90337
BufferPlacement is no longer part of bufferization. However, this test
is an important test of "finalizing" bufferize passes.
A "finalizing" bufferize conversion is one that performs a "full"
conversion and expects all tensors to be gone from the program. This in
particular involves rewriting funcs (including block arguments of the
contained region), calls, and returns. The unique property of finalizing
bufferization passes is that they cannot be done via a local
transformation with suitable materializations to ensure composability
(as other bufferization passes do). For example, if a call is
rewritten, the callee needs to be rewritten otherwise the IR will end up
invalid. Thus, finalizing bufferization passes require an atomic change
to the entire program (e.g. the whole module).
This new designation makes it clear also that it shouldn't be testing
bufferization of linalg ops, so the tests have been updated to not use
linalg.generic ops. (linalg.copy is still used as the "copy" op for
copying into out-params)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89979
This is the most basic possible finalizing bufferization pass, which I
also think is sufficient for most new use cases. The more concentrated
nature of this pass also greatly clarifies the invariants that it
requires on its input to safely transform the program (see the
pass description in Passes.td).
With this pass, I have now upstreamed practically all of the
bufferizations from npcomp (the exception being std.constant, which can
be upstreamed when std.global_memref lands:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-global-variables-in-mlir/2076/16 )
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90205
Leaking macros isn't a good practice when defining headers. This
requires to duplicate the macro definition in every header though, but
that seems like a better tradeoff right now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90633