The run-clang-tidy.py helper script is supposed to be used by the
user, hence it should be placed in the user's PATH. Some
distributions, like Gentoo [1], won't have it in PATH unless it is
installed in bin/.
Furthermore, installed scripts in PATH usually do not carry a filename
extension, since there is no need to know that this is a Python
script. For example Debian and Ubuntu already install this script as
'run-clang-tidy' [2] and hence build systems like Meson also look for
this name first [3]. Hence we install run-clang-tidy.py as
run-clang-tidy, as suggested by Sylvestre Ledru [4].
1: https://bugs.gentoo.org/753380
2: 60aefb1417/debian/clang-tidy-X.Y.links.in (L2)
3: b6dc4d5e5c/mesonbuild/scripts/clangtidy.py (L44)
4: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90972#2380640
Reviewed By: sylvestre.ledru, JonasToth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90972
ASTContext were only passed to the StmtPrinter in some places, while it
is always available in DeclPrinter. The context is used by StmtPrinter to better
print statements in some cases, like printing constants as written.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97043
Currently TypePrinter lumps anonymous classes and unnamed classes in one group "anonymous" this is not correct and can be confusing in some contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96807
blockUntilIdle of a parent can't always be correctly implemented as
return ChildA.blockUntilIdle() && ChildB.blockUntilIdle()
The problem is that B can schedule work on A while we're waiting on it.
I believe this is theoretically possible today between CDB and background index.
Modules open more possibilities and it's hard to reason about all of them.
I don't have a perfect fix, and the abstraction is too good to lose. this patch:
- calls out why we block on workscheduler first, and asserts correctness
- documents the issue
- reduces the practical possibility of spuriously returning true significantly
This function is ultimately only for testing, so we're driving down flake rate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96856
Prevent warning when the values are initialized using fields that will be initialized later or VarDecls defined in the constructors body.
Both of these cases can't be safely fixed.
Also improve logic of finding where to insert member initializers, previously it could be confused by in class member initializers.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97132
After updating clang driver to include standard
OpenCL headers implicitly, the output being checked
in the test does not match because the implicit
header contains other pragmas. The test does not
aim to use the header and therefore it has to be
updated passing '-cl-no-stdinc' command-line flag.
This fixes failing bots.
Diagnose the problem in templates in the context of the template
declaration instead of in the context of all of the (possibly very many)
template instantiations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96224
Clang-tidy seems to output color only when printing directly to
terminal, but an option to force color-output has been added in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D7947
Now, given `template <typename T> foo() {}` when user types `fo^<int>()` the
completion snippet will not contain `<int>()`.
Also, when the next token is opening parenthesis (`(`) and completion snippet
contains template argument list, it is still emitted.
This patch complements D81380.
Related issue: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/387
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89870
Some URI scheme needs the hint path to do a correct resolution, we pass
one of the open files as hint path.
This is not perfect, and it might not work for opening files across
project, but it would fix a bug with our internal scheme.
in the long run, removing URIs from all the index internals is a more proper fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96844
Because it no longer relies on finding implicit casts, this check now
works on templates which are not instantiated in the translation unit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96138
The redundancy around work-done-progress is annoying but ok for now.
There's a weirdness with context lifetimes around outgoing method calls, which
I've preserved to keep this NFC. We should probably fix it though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96717
Path{Match,Exclude} and MountPoint were checking paths case-sensitively
on all platforms, as with other features, this was causing problems on
windows. Since users can have capital drive letters on config files, but
editors might lower-case them.
This patch addresses that issue by:
- Creating regexes with case-insensitive matching on those platforms.
- Introducing a new pathIsAncestor helper, which performs checks in a
case-correct manner where needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96690
The patch also does some cleanup on the interface of the entry
points from TargetFinder into the heuristic resolution code.
Since the heuristic resolver is created in a place where the
ASTContext is available, it can store the ASTContext and the
NameFactory hack can be removed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92290
This is NFC because the MessageHandler refused to dispatch to them until the
server is initialized anyway.
This is a more natural time to bind them - it's when they become callable, and
it's when client capabalities are available and server ones can be set.
One module-lifecycle function will be responsible for all three.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96608
The goal is to allow the LSP bindings of features to be defined outside
the ClangdLSPServer class, turning it into less of a monolith.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96544
In clangd-12 the ability to override what clang tidy checks should run was moved into config.
For the 13 release its a wise progression to remove the command line option for this.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96508
Currently Clang tidy provider searches from the root directory up to the target directory, this is the opposite of how clang-tidy searches for config files.
The result of this is .clang-tidy files are ignored in any subdirectory of a directory containing a .clang-tidy file.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96204
Currently, all include insertions are directed to the main file. However,
Transformer rules can specify alternative destinations for include
insertions. This patch fixes the code to associate the include with the correct
file.
This patch was tested manually. The clang tidy unit test framework does not
support testing changes to header files. Given that this is a bug fix for a live
bug, the patch relies on manual testing rather than blocking on upgrading the
unit test framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96542
- Instead of `AppDelegate::application:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:` you
will now see `-[AppDelegate application:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:]`
- Also include categories in the name when printing the scopes, e.g. `Class(Category)` and `-[Class(Category) method]`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68590
This patch only focuses on the flag. Removing actual single-file mode
(and the flag in RenameOption) will come in a follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96495
In addition to wall time etc. this should allow us to get less noisy
values for time measurements.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96049
Today, inside a template, you can get completion for:
Foo<T> t;
t.^
t has dependent type Foo<T>, and we use the primary template to find its members.
However we also want this to work:
t.foo.bar().^
The type of t.foo.bar() is DependentTy, so we attempt to resolve using similar
heuristics (e.g. primary template).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96376
This is obsoleted by the standard semanticTokens request family.
As well as the protocol details, this allows us to remove a bunch of plumbing
around pushing highlights to clients.
This should not land until the new protocol has feature parity, see D77702.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95576
Nathan James