Summary:
We don't need a side table in ASTContext to hold CXXDefaultArgExprs. The
important part of building the CXXDefaultArgExprs was to ODR use the
default argument expressions, not to make AST nodes. Refactor the code
to only check the default argument, and remove the side table in
ASTContext which wasn't being serialized.
Fixes PR31121
Reviewers: thakis, rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27007
llvm-svn: 287774
of a method that was declared in an invalid interface
This commit fixes an infinite loop that occurs when clang tries to iterate over
redeclaration of a method that was declared in an invalid @interface. The
existing validity checks don't catch this as that @interface is a duplicate of
a previously declared valid @interface declaration, so we have to verify that
the found redeclaration is in a valid declaration context.
rdar://29220965
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26664
llvm-svn: 287530
Instead of always displaying the mangled name, try to do better
and get something closer to regular functions.
Recommit r287039 (that was reverted in r287039) with a tweak to
be more generic, and test fixes!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26522
llvm-svn: 287085
common case of a call to a non-builtin, particularly for unoptimized ASan
builds (where the per-variable stack usage can be quite high).
llvm-svn: 287066
Instead of always displaying the mangled name, try to do better
and get something closer to regular functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26522
llvm-svn: 287039
Only look for a variable's value in the constant expression evaluation activation frame, if the variable was indeed declared in that frame, otherwise it might be a constant expression and be usable within a nested local scope or emit an error.
void f(char c) {
struct X {
static constexpr char f() {
return c; // error gracefully here as opposed to crashing.
}
};
int I = X::f();
}
llvm-svn: 286748
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
Output generated by option -ast-print looks like C/C++ code, and it
really is for plain C. For C++ the produced output was not valid C++
code, but the differences were small. With this change the output
is fixed and can be compiled. Tests are changed so that output produced
by -ast-print is compiled again with the same flags and both outputs are
compared.
Option -ast-print is extensively used in clang tests but it itself
was tested poorly, existing tests only checked that compiler did not
crash. There are unit tests in file DeclPrinterTest.cpp, but they test
only terse output mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26452
llvm-svn: 286439
expansions by calling getSpellingLoc(). That's great in most cases, but for
macros defined in the '<built-in>' source file, the source file is invalid
and does not import correctly, causing an assertion failure (the assertion
is Invalid SLocOffset or bad function choice).
A more reliable way to avoid this is to use getFileLoc(), which does not
return built-in locations. This avoids the crash but still preserves valid
source locations.
I've added a testcase that covers the previously crashing scenario.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26054
llvm-svn: 286144
which guarantee pointers are not null. These all seem to have useful
properties and correlations to document, in one case we even had it in
a comment but now it will also be an assert.
This should prevent PVS-Studio from incorrectly claiming that there are
a bunch of potential bugs here. But I feel really strongly that the
PVS-Studio warnings that pointed at this code have a far too high
false-positive rate to be entirely useful. These are just places where
there did seem to be a useful invariant to document and verify with an
assert. Several other places in the code were already correct and
already have perfectly clear code documenting and validating their
invariants, but still ran afoul of PVS-Studio.
llvm-svn: 285985
* if the base is produced by a series of derived-to-base conversions, check
the expression inside them when looking for an expression with a known
dynamic type
* step past MaterializeTemporaryExprs when checking for a known dynamic type
* when checking for a known dynamic type, treat all class prvalues as having
a known dynamic type after skipping all relevant rvalue subobject
adjustments
* treat callees formed by pointer-to-member access for a non-reference member
type like callees formed by member access.
llvm-svn: 285954
This patch implements the register call calling convention, which ensures
as many values as possible are passed in registers. CodeGen changes
were committed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284108.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25204
llvm-svn: 285849
This commit improves the "must have C++ linkage" error diagnostics that are
emitted for C++ declarations like templates and literal operators by adding an
additional note that points to the appropriate extern "C" linkage specifier.
rdar://19021120
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26189
llvm-svn: 285823
Commit on behalf of mharoush
After LGTM and check all:
This patch is a compatibility fix for clang, matching GCC support for charter escape when using extended in-line assembly (i.e, "%{" ,"%}" --> "{" ,"}" ).
It is meant to enable support for advanced features such as AVX512 conditional\masked vector instructions/broadcast assembly syntax.
Reviewer: 1. rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25012
llvm-svn: 285585
Previously we were asserting that this declaration doesn't have a body
*and* won't have a body after we continue parsing. This is too strong
and breaks the go-bindings test during codegen.
llvm-svn: 285412
Summary:
In CUDA compilation, we call isInlineDefinitionExternallyVisible (via
getGVALinkageForFunction) on functions while parsing their definitions.
At the point in time when we call getGVALinkageForFunction, we haven't
yet added the body to the function, so we trip this assert. But as far
as I can tell, this is harmless.
To work around this, we add a new flag to FunctionDecl, "WillHaveBody".
There was other code that was working around the existing assert with a
really awful hack -- this change lets us get rid of that hack.
Reviewers: rsmith, tra
Subscribers: aemerson, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25640
llvm-svn: 285410
abstract information about the callee. NFC.
The goal here is to make it easier to recognize indirect calls and
trigger additional logic in certain cases. That logic will come in
a later patch; in the meantime, I felt that this was a significant
improvement to the code.
llvm-svn: 285258
Extend lifetime of ExceptionTypeStorage, as it is referenced by
CanonicalEPI and used outside the block (ExceptionSpec.Exceptions is an
ArrayRef)
Patch by Sam McCall!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25983
llvm-svn: 285192
This has the following ABI impact:
1) Functions whose parameter or return types are non-throwing function pointer
types have different manglings in c++1z mode from prior modes. This is
necessary because c++1z permits overloading on the noexceptness of function
pointer parameter types. A warning is issued for cases that will change
manglings in c++1z mode.
2) Functions whose parameter or return types contain instantiation-dependent
exception specifications change manglings in all modes. This is necessary
to support overloading on / SFINAE in these exception specifications, which
a careful reading of the standard indicates has essentially always been
permitted.
Note that, in order to be affected by these changes, the code in question must
specify an exception specification on a function pointer/reference type that is
written syntactically within the declaration of another function. Such
declarations are very rare, and I have so far been unable to find any code
that would be affected by this. (Note that such things will probably become
more common in C++17, since it's a lot easier to get a noexcept function type
as a function parameter / return type there.)
This change does not affect the set of symbols produced by a build of clang,
libc++, or libc++abi.
llvm-svn: 285150
Warnings generated by -Wdocumentation-unknown-command did only have a
start location, not a full source range. This resulted in only the
"carret" being show in messages, and IDEs highlighting only the single
initial character.
llvm-svn: 285056
to emit the <template-args> portion. Refactor so that mangleUnresolvedName
actually emits the entire <unresolved-name>, so this mistake is harder to make
again.
llvm-svn: 285022
resolved the -> to a call to a specific operator-> function. The particular
test case added here is actually being mishandled: the implicit member access
should not be type-dependent (because it's accessing a non-type-dependent
member of the current instantiation), but calls to a type-dependent operator->
that is a member of the current instantiation would be liable to hit the same
codepath.
llvm-svn: 284999
dependent noexcept specifications result in the same canonical function type.
We still use non-canonical hashing when deduplicating type sugar so that
diagnostics will point to the right place.
llvm-svn: 284457
This reverts commit r284176. It still marks some modules as invisible
that should be visible. Will follow up with the author with a test case.
llvm-svn: 284382
Benjamin Kramer