The BYTE, SHORT, LONG, and QUAD commands store one, two, four, and eight bytes (respectively).
After storing the bytes, the location counter is incremented by the number of bytes
stored.
Previously our scripts handles these commands incorrectly. For example:
SECTIONS {
.foo : {
*(.foo.1)
BYTE(0x11)
...
We accepted the script above treating BYTE as input section description.
These commands are used in the wild though.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24830
llvm-svn: 282429
We were counting the size of the bss section holding common symbols twice:
Dot += CurOutSec->getSize();
flush();
The new code is also simpler as now flush is the only function that
inserts in AlreadyOutputOS, which makes sense since the set hold fully
output sections.
llvm-svn: 282285
Previously we failed to parse next scripts because disallowed
a space between filler value and '=':
.text : {
...
} :text = 0x9090
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24831
llvm-svn: 282248
DEFINED(symbol)
Return 1 if symbol is in the linker global symbol table and is defined before
the statement using DEFINED in the script, otherwise return 0.
Can be used to define default values for symbols. Found it in the wild.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24858
llvm-svn: 282245
Found this operators used in the wild scripts, for example:
__got2_entries = (_FIXUP_TABLE_ - _GOT2_TABLE_) >>2;
__fixup_entries = (. - _FIXUP_TABLE_)>>2;
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24860
llvm-svn: 282243
With the recent changes there should always be a 1:1 correspondence in
the correct order between OutputSections and OutputSectionCommands.
llvm-svn: 282176
The actual logic is to keep the output section if the output section
would have been ro/rw.
This is both simpler and more practical, as the intention is linker
scripts is to always keep of of a pair of ONLY_IF_RO/ONLY_IF_RW.
llvm-svn: 282099
This is PR30442.
Previously we were failed to parce complex expressions like:
foo : { *(SORT_BY_NAME(bar) zed) }
Main idea of patch that globs and excludes can be wrapped in a SORT.
There is a difference in semanics of ld/gold:
ld likes:
*(SORT(EXCLUDE_FILE (*file1.o) .foo.1))
gold likes:
*(EXCLUDE_FILE (*file1.o) SORT(.foo.1))
Patch implements ld grammar, complex expressions like
next is not a problem anymore:
.abc : { *(SORT(.foo.* EXCLUDE_FILE (*file1.o) .bar.*) .bar.*) }
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24758
llvm-svn: 282078
When final image has several .bss sections, lld fails
because second .bss always has zero VA. This causes
link error "Not enough space for ELF and program headers"
llvm-svn: 282067
It is not only a bit more straightforward now, but also next 2 issues are solved:
* It just crashed on ".foo : { *(EXCLUDE_FILE (*file1.o)) }" before.
* It accepted multiple EXCLUDE_FILEs in a row.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24726
llvm-svn: 282060
This reverts commit r282021, bringing back r282015.
The problem was that the comparison function was not a strict weak
ordering anymore, which this patch fixes.
Original message:
Only restrict order if both sections are in the script.
This matches gold and bfd behavior and is required to handle some scripts.
The script has to assume where PT_LOADs start in order to align that
spot. If we don't allow section it doesn't know about to move to the
middle, we can need more PT_LOADs and those will not be aligned.
llvm-svn: 282035
This matches gold and bfd behavior and is required to handle some scripts.
The script has to assume where PT_LOADs start in order to align that
spot. If we don't allow section it doesn't know about to move to the
middle, we can need more PT_LOADs and those will not be aligned.
llvm-svn: 282015
Will Dietz found and reported that lld does not compile with gcc 6.2.0,
more details https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30438
And confirmed this change fixes the issue.
llvm-svn: 281900
Our implementation supported integer value previously.
ld can use expression,
for example, it is OK to write
. = SEGMENT_START("foobar", .);
Patch implements that.
llvm-svn: 281831
It was possible situation about some commands just were not processed
(were skipped) because of a bug appeared when constraint checking used.
Testcase is attached.
llvm-svn: 281818
This matches gold and bfd, and is pretty much required by some linker
scripts. They end with commands like
foo 0 : { *(bar) }
if we put any SHF_ALLOC sections after they can have an address that
is too low.
llvm-svn: 281778
This matches bfd behavior. It also makes future changes simpler as we
don't have to worry about ignoring these commands in multiple places
llvm-svn: 281775
With fix for 2 bots. Details about the fix performed is on a review page.
Initial commit message:
This is PR30387:
From PR description:
We fail to parse
SECTIONS
{
foo :
{
*(sec0 EXCLUDE_FILE (zed1.o) sec1 EXCLUDE_FILE (zed2.o) sec2 )
}
}
The semantics according to bfd are:
Include sec1 from every file but zed1.o
Include sec2 from every file but zed2.o
Include sec0 from every file
Patch implements the support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24650
llvm-svn: 281754
This fixes pr30367, but more importantly, it changes how we compute offsets.
Now offset computation in a walk over linker script commands, like the
rest of assignAddresses. IMHO this is simpler to understand and if we
ever have to create multiple outputsections or chunks to change how we
handle test/ELF/linkerscript/alternate-sections.s it should be easier
to do it.
llvm-svn: 281736
This is PR30387:
From PR description:
We fail to parse
SECTIONS
{
foo :
{
*(sec0 EXCLUDE_FILE (zed1.o) sec1 EXCLUDE_FILE (zed2.o) sec2 )
}
}
The semantics according to bfd are:
Include sec1 from every file but zed1.o
Include sec2 from every file but zed2.o
Include sec0 from every file
Patch implements the support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24650
llvm-svn: 281721
This is PR30386,
SORT_BY_INIT_PRIORITY is a keyword can be used to sort sections by numerical value of the
GCC init_priority attribute encoded in the section name.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24611
llvm-svn: 281646
Petr Hosek