Found by ubsan. This was taking a bool and left shifting by 32 - the
result is 64 bit, so we should really do the math in a type it fits
in.
llvm-svn: 237345
The outer if had 3 separate conditions ORed together and then the inner ifs detected which of the three conditions it was by using only a portion of the specific condition. Just put the whole condition in each inner if and remove the outer if.
llvm-svn: 237343
Previously the code was accidentally checking if 'this' was an IntRecTy which it can't be since 'this' is a BitRecTy. Looking back at the history it appears it was intended to check RHS.
llvm-svn: 235477
Turns out I misread the parentheses. Though I'm pretty sure its always a RecordRecTy and non of the callers really seem to expect null. But until I'm completely sure I'm going to revert this.
llvm-svn: 235469
This patch was generated by a clang tidy checker that is being open sourced.
The documentation of that checker is the following:
/// The emptiness of a container should be checked using the empty method
/// instead of the size method. It is not guaranteed that size is a
/// constant-time function, and it is generally more efficient and also shows
/// clearer intent to use empty. Furthermore some containers may implement the
/// empty method but not implement the size method. Using empty whenever
/// possible makes it easier to switch to another container in the future.
Patch by Gábor Horváth!
llvm-svn: 226161
Clang's static analyzer found several potential cases of undefined
behavior, use of un-initialized values, and potentially null pointer
dereferences in tablegen, Support, MC, and ADT. This cleans them up
with specific assertions on the assumptions of the code.
llvm-svn: 224154
This does nothing but remove the Record from the map, and
then re-add it, without actually changing it in between.
The Record's Name used to be changed before re-adding it
when the code was first committed in r137232, but the
name-changing lines were removed in r142510, and since
then this code seems to do nothing.
This was also the only caller of removeClass or removeDef,
so now RecordKeeper owns its Records unconditionally,
and could be unique_ptr-ified.
llvm-svn: 216349
Prior to this change, it was legal to do something like
bits<2> opc = { 0, 1 };
bits<2> opc2 = { 1, 0 };
bits<2> a = { opc, opc2 };
This involved silently dropping bits from opc and opc2 which is very hard to debug.
Now the above test would be an error. Having tested with an assert, none of LLVM/clang was relying on this behaviour.
Thanks to Adam Nemet for the above test.
llvm-svn: 215083
Convert the operand to int if possible, i.e. if the value is properly
initialized. (I suppose there is further room for improvement here to also
peform the shift if the uninitialized bits are shifted out.)
With this little change we can now compute the scaling factor for compressed
displacement with pure tablegen code in the X86 backend. This is useful
because both the X86-disassembler-specific part of tablegen and the assembler
need this and TD is the natural sharing place.
The patch also adds the missing documentation for the shift and add operator.
llvm-svn: 213277
Also removed an inaccurate comment that stated that a DenseMap was used as
storage for the ListInit*'s. It's currently using a FoldingSet.
I expect there's a better way to fix this but I haven't found it yet. FoldingSet
is incompatible with the Pool template and I'm not sure if FoldingSet can be
safely replaced with a DenseMap of computed FoldingSetID's to ListInit*'s.
llvm-svn: 208293
Summary:
It concatenates two or more lists. In addition to the !strconcat semantics
the lists must have the same element type.
My overall aim is to make it easy to append to Instruction.Predicates
rather than override it. This can be done by concatenating lists passed as
arguments, or by concatenating lists passed in additional fields.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3506
llvm-svn: 208183
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Most places can use PrintFatalError as the unwinding mechanism was not
used for anything other than printing the error. The single exception
was CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp, where intermediate errors during type
resolution were ignored to simplify incremental platform development.
This use is replaced by an error flag in TreePattern and bailout earlier
in various places if it is set.
llvm-svn: 166712
Craig Topper