Summary:
This value is already defaulted to true in asan_internal.h.
Allow the value to be overriden in cases where exceptions are unavailable.
Reviewers: kcc, samsonov, compnerd
Subscribers: kubabrecka, dberris, beanz, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24633
llvm-svn: 281746
The definitions in sanitizer_common may conflict with definitions from system headers because:
The runtime includes the system headers after the project headers (as per LLVM coding guidelines).
lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h pollutes the namespace of everything defined after it, which is all/most of the sanitizer .h and .cc files and the included system headers with: using namespace __sanitizer; // NOLINT
This patch solves the problem by introducing the namespace only within the sanitizer namespaces as proposed by Dmitry.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21947
llvm-svn: 281657
Don't list __sanitizer_print_memory profile as an INTERFACE_FUNCTION. It
is not exported by ASan; it is exported by user code.
Move the weak definition from asan_win.cc to sanitizer_win.cc to fix the
ubsan tests.
llvm-svn: 281619
Summary:
ASAN on Windows 64-bits should use a dynamic address instead of a fixed one.
The asan-allocator code to support dynamic address is already landed.
This patch is turning on the feature.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: kubabrecka, dberris, llvm-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24575
llvm-svn: 281522
When running with start_deactivated=1 in ASAN_OPTIONS, heap redzones
are not poisoned until the first instrumented module is loaded. This
can cause false negatives even on memory allocated after activation,
because redzones are normally poisoned only once when a new allocator
region is mapped.
This change attempts to fix it by iterating over all existing
allocator chunks and poisoning their redzones.
llvm-svn: 281364
Summary:
Added a macro to enumerate the (error name, error member name) pairs. This way,
when adding an error, we only need to add the pair to one place (plus add its
implementation, or course).
Reviewers: kcc, samsonov
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubabrecka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23875
llvm-svn: 281237
Summary: As mentioned in D24394, I'm moving tid to ErrorBase, since basically all errors need it.
Also mentioned in the same review are other cleanups like adding const
to BufferedStackTrace and make sure constructor orders are consistent.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, kcc, eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubabrecka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24455
llvm-svn: 281236
Summary:
This is important information when we want to describe errors, and should be
part of these descriptions. Otherwise, we need to know the access size when
printing/emitting the description.
Reviewers: kcc, eugenis, vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubabrecka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24387
llvm-svn: 281093
Summary:
This is useful for inclusion in the Error* structures, to describe an
arbitrary address.
Remove the old struct since it's used only once. This removes one level of
indirection, and moves all *AddressDescription to be one of the recently
introduced structures.
This merges differential revisions: D24131 and D24132
Reviewers: kcc, eugenis, vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubabrecka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24131
llvm-svn: 281090
Reset the SIGABRT signal handler before calling abort().
Also, change the error message when catching SIGABRT to say "ABRT"
instead of "SEGV".
llvm-svn: 280885
Android-specific code in GetCurrentThread() does not handle the situation when there is no
ThreadContext for the current thread. This happens if the current thread is requested before the
main thread is added to the registry. 64-bit allocator does that to record map/unmap stats during
initialization.
llvm-svn: 280876
Summary:
A few small changes required to permit building the sanitizers
with Clang instead of only with MSVC.
Reviewers: compnerd, beanz, rnk
Subscribers: beanz, timurrrr, kubabrecka, dberris, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24092
llvm-svn: 280863
Since r279664 this test causes frequent failures of test runs for ppc64le and
occasional failures for ppc64be which makes buildbot results unreliable. If
the underlying problem is fixed it can be re-enabled.
llvm-svn: 280823
When optimizing, GCC optimizes away aggressively unused static globals.
The __asan_before_dynamic_init/__asan_after_dynamic_init calls are placed
in static constructor earlier while the registration of the globals is done
later in the compilation process. If all the globals with
dynamic initialization are optimized away from some particular TU in between
those two, libasan can fail on an assertion that dynamic_init_globals is
empty.
While I'm going to commit a GCC change which will remove the
__asan_before_dynamic_init/__asan_after_dynamic_init in many cases when this
happens (basically if the optimizers can prove there are no memory
references in between the two calls), there are still testcases where such
pair of calls is left, e.g. for
struct S { S () { asm volatile ("" : : : "memory"); } };
static S c;
int
main ()
{
return 0;
}
with -O2 -fsanitize=address and ASAN_OPTIONS=check_initialization_order=true
this still fails the assertion. Trying to avoid this problem on the
compiler side would decrease code quality I'm afraid, whether it is making
sure for -fsanitize=address we keep around at least one dynamically
initialized global if the
__asan_before_dynamic_init/__asan_after_dynamic_init pair has been emitted,
or adding some artificial global which would be used as the condition for
those calls etc.
So, can the assertion be instead just removed, this really shouldn't slow
down the calls measurably (for __asan_before_dynamic_init it is even
cheaper) and the assertion doesn't check something worthwhile anyway (it is
sufficient if there is a single dynamically initialized global in any other
TU to make it happy).
Details in http://gcc.gnu.org/PR77396
Author: Jakub Jelinek
llvm-svn: 280657
Summary:
@kcc: I know you've accepted the other revision, but since this is a
non-trivial change, I'm updating it to show why D24029 would help.
This commit sets up the infrastructure to use reified error
descriptions, and moves ReportStackOverflow to the new system.
After we convert all the errors, we'll be able to simplify ScopedInErrorReport
and remove the older debugging mechanism which had some errors partly reified
in some way. We'll be able to maintain the external API.
ScopedInErrorReport will be able to track one of the reified errors at a time.
The purpose of this is so we have its destructor actually print the error and
possibly interface with the debugger (will depend on the platform, of course).
Reviewers: kcc, samsonov, timurrrr
Subscribers: kcc, llvm-commits, kubabrecka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24030
llvm-svn: 280111
Summary:
This is needed so we can use it for D23672 on VS2013, since this VS
version doesn't support unrestricted unions, and doesn't allow us to
uses an object without a trivial default constructor inside a union.
Reviewers: kcc, samsonov
Subscribers: kubabrecka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24029
llvm-svn: 280110
Summary:
We are going to use store instructions to poison some allocas.
Runtime flag will require branching in instrumented code on every lifetime
intrinsic. We'd like to avoid that.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubabrecka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23967
llvm-svn: 279981
Summary:
This commit sets up the infrastructure to use reified error
descriptions, and moves ReportStackOverflow to the new system.
After we convert all the errors, we'll be able to simplify ScopedInErrorReport
and remove the older debugging mechanism which had some errors partly reified
in some way. We'll be able to maintain the external API.
ScopedInErrorReport will be able to track one of the reified errors at a time.
The purpose of this is so we have its destructor actually print the error and
possibly interface with the debugger (will depend on the platform, of course).
Reviewers: kcc, samsonov, timurrrr
Subscribers: kubabrecka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23672
llvm-svn: 279931