As Richard Smith pointed out in the review of D90123, both the C and C++
standard call it lvalue and rvalue, so let's stick to the same spelling
in Clang.
When an overloaded member function has a ref-qualifier, like:
class X {
void f() &&;
void f(int) &;
};
we would print strange notes when the ref-qualifier doesn't fit the value
category:
X x;
x.f();
X().f(0);
would both print a note "no known conversion from 'X' to 'X' for object
argument" on their relevant overload instead of pointing out the
mismatch in value category.
At first I thought the solution is easy: just use the FailureKind member
of the BadConversionSequence struct. But it turns out that we weren't
properly setting this for function arguments. So I went through
TryReferenceInit to make sure we're doing that right, and found a number
of notes in the existing tests that improved as well.
Fixes PR47791.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90123
The function `TryListConversion` didn't properly validate the following
part of the standard:
Otherwise, if the parameter type is a character array [... ]
and the initializer list has a single element that is an
appropriately-typed string literal (8.5.2 [dcl.init.string]), the
implicit conversion sequence is the identity conversion.
This caused the following call to `f()` to be ambiguous.
void f(int(&&)[1]);
void f(unsigned(&&)[1]);
void g(unsigned i) {
f({i});
}
This issue only occurs when the initializer list had one element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87561
The C++ rules briefly allowed this, but the rule changed nearly 10 years
ago and we never updated our implementation to match. However, we've
warned on this by default for a long time, and no other compiler accepts
(even as an extension).
layout" rules.
The new rules say that a standard-layout struct has its first non-static
data member and all base classes at offset 0, and consider a class to
not be standard-layout if that would result in multiple subobjects of a
single type having the same address.
We track "is C++11 standard-layout class" separately from "is
standard-layout class" so that the ABIs that need this information can
still use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45176
llvm-svn: 329332
* Update version number in DR tests from 4.0 to 4
* Teach make_cxx_dr_status script about version numbers that don't contain a
period.
* Update cxx_status.html and cxx_dr_status.html to list Clang 4 features as
"Clang 4" rather than "SVN"
Clang 4 features are still listed in yellow rather than green until release.
llvm-svn: 291871
specialized than the primary template. (Put another way, if we imagine there
were a partial specialization matching the primary template, we should never
select it if some other partial specialization also matches.)
llvm-svn: 290593
subobject initialization is not possible, be sure to note the overall
initialization as having failed so that overload resolution knows that the
relevant candidate is not viable.
llvm-svn: 229353
always use the normal copy-initialization rules. Remove a special case that
tries to stay within the list initialization checker here; that makes us do the
wrong thing when list-initialization of an aggregate would not perform
aggregate initialization.
llvm-svn: 228897
initializer of the form {x}, where x is of type C or a type derived from C,
perform *non-list* initialization of the entity from x, but create a
CXXConstructExpr that knows that we used list-initialization syntax.
Plus some fixes to ensure we mangle correctly in this and related cases.
llvm-svn: 228276
Only the first two items for now, changing Sections 8.5.4 [dcl.init.list] paragraph 3 and 13.3.1.7 [over.match.list] paragraph 1,
so that defining class objects and character arrays using uniform initialization syntax is actually treated as list initialization
and before it is treated aggregate initialization.
llvm-svn: 227022
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.
(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)
This reverts commit r197295.
llvm-svn: 197299
Previously, a line like
// expected-error-re {{foo}}
treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".
This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.
(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388
llvm-svn: 197092
more than one such initializer in a union, make mem-initializers override
default initializers for other union members, handle anonymous unions with
anonymous struct members better. Fix a couple of semi-related bugs exposed by
the tests for same.
llvm-svn: 196892
Aaron Puchert