Before:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t) -> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a)
.aaaaaaaa());
After:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t)
-> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a).aaaaaaaa());
Also add a test case for a difficult template parsing case I stumbled accross.
Needs fixing.
llvm-svn: 239149
This is a more correct representation than using "Equality" introduced
in r238942 which was a quick fix to solve an actual regression.
According to the typescript spec, arrows behave like "low-precedence"
assignments.
Before:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
After:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
llvm-svn: 239137
Before:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> =
[new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
llvm-svn: 238909
Before:
someFunction(() =>
{
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
After:
someFunction(() => {
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
This is still bad, but at least it is consistent with what we do for other
function literals. Added corresponding tests.
llvm-svn: 238736
method expressions and array literals. They should not bind stronger
than regular parentheses or the braces of braced lists.
Specific test case in JavaScript:
Before:
var aaaaa: List<
SomeThing> = [new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
llvm-svn: 238400
A definintion like this could not be formatted at all:
constructor({aa}: {
aa?: string,
aaaaaaaa?: string,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?: boolean,
aaaaaa?: List<string>
}) {
}
llvm-svn: 238291
instead of BinPackParameters. Braced lists are used as constructor
calls in many places and so the bin-packing should follow what is done
for other calls and not what is done for function declarations.
llvm-svn: 238184
Specifically, don't add a space before it.
Before:
someFunction(... a);
var x = [1, 2, ... a];
After:
someFunction(...a);
var x = [1, 2, ...a];
llvm-svn: 238183
This fixes a case where the column limit was incorrectly calculated
leading to a macro like this:
#define A \
[] { \
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx( \
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); \
}
exceeding the column limit.
llvm-svn: 238182
Assigns a token type (TT_JsFatArrow) to => tokens, and uses that to
more easily recognize and format fat arrow functions.
Improves function parsing to better recognize formal parameter
lists and return type declarations.
Recognizes arrow functions and parse function bodies as child blocks.
Patch by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 237895
"void (*my_function)(void)" should become "void (*my_function) (void)" when
SpaceBeforeParens is set to 'Always'
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9835
llvm-svn: 237704
Before:
for (SmallVectorImpl<TemplateIdAnnotationn *>::iterator I =
Container.begin(),
E = Container.end();
I != E; ++I)
After:
for (SmallVectorImpl<TemplateIdAnnotationn *>::iterator
I = Container.begin(),
E = Container.end();
I != E; ++I)
This fixes llvm.org/PR23544.
llvm-svn: 237688
Before:
[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.
aaaaaaaa];
After:
[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaa];
This merely papers over the fact that we aren't parsing ObjC method calls
correctly. Also, the indentation is weird.
llvm-svn: 237681
Before:
class C : test {
class D : test{void f(){int i{2};
}
}
;
}
;
After:
class C : test {
class D : test {
void f() { int i{2}; }
};
};
llvm-svn: 237569
Before:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa")
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
After:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa") << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
Also cleanup implementation a bit and only mark closing parenthesis of
these annotations.
llvm-svn: 237567
Generally, clang-format tries to keep label-value pairs on a single
line for stream operators. However, we should not do that if there is
just a single such pair, as that doesn't help much.
Before:
llvm::errs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaa: " << aaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaa);
After:
llvm::errs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaa: "
<< aaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaa);
Also remove old test case that was testing actual behavior any more.
llvm-svn: 237535
comments. At some point, we might to want to a layout with a different
number of columns instead, but at the moment, this causes more
confusion than it's worth.
llvm-svn: 237427
before binary/ternary operators.
Basically, it doesn't seem right to indent a nested block aligned to a
binary or ternary operator.
Before:
int i = aaaaaa ? 1 //
: [] {
return 2; //
}();
llvm::errs() << "number of twos is "
<< std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
return x == 2; // force break
});
After:
int i = aaaaaa ? 1 //
: [] {
return 2; //
}();
llvm::errs() << "number of twos is "
<< std::count_if(v.begin(), v.end(), [](int x) {
return x == 2; // force break
});
llvm-svn: 237263
Summary:
a) Pull out a class LevelIndentTracker whose responsibility is to keep track
of the indent of levels across multiple annotated lines.
b) Put all responsibility for merging lines into the LineJoiner; make the
LineJoiner iterate over the lines so we never operate on a line that might
be merged later; this makes the interface safer to use.
c) Move formatting of the end-of-file whitespace into formatFirstToken.
Fix bugs that became obvious after the refactoring:
1. We would not format lines with offsets correctly inside nested blocks if
only the outer expression was affected:
int x = s({ // clang-format only this line
class X {
public:
// ^ this starts at the non-modified indnent level; previously we would
// not fix this, now we correctly outdent it.
void f();
};
});
2. We would incorrectly align comments across lines that do not have comments
for lines with nested blocks:
int expression; // with comment
int x = s({
int y; // comment
int z; // we would incorrectly align this comment with the comment on
// 'expression'
});
llvm-svn: 237104
Daniel Jasper