A zero-extended value can be interpreted as a piecewise defined signed
value. If the value was non-negative it stays the same, otherwise it
is the sum of the original value and 2^n where n is the bit-width of
the original (or operand) type. Examples:
zext i8 127 to i32 -> { [127] }
zext i8 -1 to i32 -> { [256 + (-1)] } = { [255] }
zext i8 %v to i32 -> [v] -> { [v] | v >= 0; [256 + v] | v < 0 }
However, LLVM/Scalar Evolution uses zero-extend (potentially lead by a
truncate) to represent some forms of modulo computation. The left-hand side
of the condition in the code below would result in the SCEV
"zext i1 <false, +, true>for.body" which is just another description
of the C expression "i & 1 != 0" or, equivalently, "i % 2 != 0".
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
if (i & 1 != 0 /* == i % 2 */)
/* do something */
If we do not make the modulo explicit but only use the mechanism described
above we will get the very restrictive assumption "N < 3", because for all
values of N >= 3 the SCEVAddRecExpr operand of the zero-extend would wrap.
Alternatively, we can make the modulo in the operand explicit in the
resulting piecewise function and thereby avoid the assumption on N. For the
example this would result in the following piecewise affine function:
{ [i0] -> [(1)] : 2*floor((-1 + i0)/2) = -1 + i0;
[i0] -> [(0)] : 2*floor((i0)/2) = i0 }
To this end we can first determine if the (immediate) operand of the
zero-extend can wrap and, in case it might, we will use explicit modulo
semantic to compute the result instead of emitting non-wrapping assumptions.
Note that operands with large bit-widths are less likely to be negative
because it would result in a very large access offset or loop bound after the
zero-extend. To this end one can optimistically assume the operand to be
positive and avoid the piecewise definition if the bit-width is bigger than
some threshold (here MaxZextSmallBitWidth).
We choose to go with a hybrid solution of all modeling techniques described
above. For small bit-widths (up to MaxZextSmallBitWidth) we will model the
wrapping explicitly and use a piecewise defined function. However, if the
bit-width is bigger than MaxZextSmallBitWidth we will employ overflow
assumptions and assume the "former negative" piece will not exist.
llvm-svn: 267408
These flags are now always passed to all tests and need to be disabled if
not needed. Disabling these flags, rather than passing them to almost all
tests, significantly simplfies our RUN: lines.
llvm-svn: 249422
Besides class, function and file names, we also change the command line option
from -polly-codegen-isl to just -polly-codegen. The isl postfix is a leftover
from the times when we still had the CLooG based -polly-codegen. Today it is
just redundant and we drop it.
llvm-svn: 237099
I just learned that target triples prevent test cases to be run on other
architectures. Polly test cases are until now sufficiently target independent
to not require any target triples. Hence, we drop them.
llvm-svn: 235384
When creating parameters the SCEVexpander may introduce new induction variables,
that possibly create scalar dependences in the original scop, before we code
generate the scop. The resulting scalar dependences may then inhibit correct
code generation of the scop. To prevent this, we first version the code without
a run-time check and only then introduce new parameters and the run-time
condition. The if-condition that guards the original scop from being modified by
the SCEVexpander.
This change causes some test case changes as the run-time conditions are now
introduced in the split basic block rather than in the entry basic block.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR22069
Test case reduced by: Karthik Senthil
llvm-svn: 233477
isl recently introduced a new interface to create run-time checks from
constraint sets. Use this interface to simplify our run-time check generation.
llvm-svn: 230640
Scops that only read seem generally uninteresting and scops that only write are
most likely initializations where there is also little to optimize. To not
waste compile time we bail early.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7735
llvm-svn: 229820
This allows us to skip ast and code generation if we did not optimize
a SCoP and will not generate parallel or alias annotations. The
initial heuristic to exit is simple but allows improvements later on.
All failing test cases have been modified to disable early exit, thus
to keep their coverage.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7254
llvm-svn: 228851
SCEV based code generation has been the default for two weeks after having
been tested for a long time. We now drop the support the non-scev-based code
generation.
llvm-svn: 222978
Summary:
+ Refactor the runtime check (RTC) build function
+ Added helper function to create an PollyIRBuilder
+ Change the simplify region function to create not
only unique entry and exit edges but also enfore that
the entry edge is unconditional
+ Cleaned the IslCodeGeneration runOnScop function:
- less post-creation changes of the created IR
+ Adjusted and added test cases
Reviewers: grosser, sebpop, simbuerg, dpeixott
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #polly
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5076
llvm-svn: 217508
This reverts commit 215466 (and 215528, a trivial formatting fix).
The intention of these commits is a good one, but unfortunately they broke
our LNT buildbot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-codegen-isl
Several of the cleanup changes that have been combined in this 'fixup' are
trivial and could probably be committed as obvious changes without risking to
break the build. The remaining changes are little and it should be easy to
figure out what went wrong.
llvm-svn: 215817
As our delinearization works optimistically, we need in some cases run-time
checks that verify our optimistic assumptions. A simple example is the
following code:
void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 150; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < 200; k++)
A[i][j][k] = 1.0;
}
After clang linearized the access to A and we delinearized it again to
A[i][j][k] we need to ensure that we do not access the delinearized array
out of bounds (this information is not available in LLVM-IR). Hence, we
need to verify the following constraints at run-time:
CHECK: Assumed Context:
CHECK: [o, m] -> { : m >= 150 and o >= 200 }
llvm-svn: 212198
Johannes Doerfert