It currently fires an assert if you even try. Looking back, I don't think it ever worked because it only changed the name of the function object, but not the intrinsic ID stored in it. Given that, I think it can be removed since no one has noticed or complained in the past 4 years.
llvm-svn: 286031
This change fixes a bug that was introduced by r285851.
r285851 converted .interp section as an output section to an input
section. But I forgot to make it a "Live" section, so if -gc-section
is given, it was garbage collected.
llvm-svn: 286025
This Makes sure we only export targets that we're distributing, since
cmake will fail to import the file otherwise due to missing targets.
llvm-svn: 286024
Summary: IsExpensiveToCopy can return false positives for incomplete types, so ignore them.
All existing ClangTidy tests that depend on this function still pass as the types are complete.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26195
llvm-svn: 286008
This replaces every occurrence of _LIBCPP_STD_VER in the tests with
TEST_STD_VER. Additionally, for every affected
file, #include "test_macros.h" is being added explicitly if it wasn't
already there.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26294
llvm-svn: 286007
Summary: This patch returns the same label if the CP entry with the same value has been created.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, rengolin, jmolloy
Subscribers: majnemer, jmolloy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25804
llvm-svn: 286006
It turned ou that we actually want to call std::for_each even if
threading is supported. Unless --thread is given, LLD shouldn't use
more than one threads.
llvm-svn: 286004
This reflects the current state of Global ISel. As progress is
made, we'll document our design decisions in it.
Comments very welcome!
llvm-svn: 286002
Summary:
Fix generated by this check changed program semantics
in the case where 'if' was a part (direct child) of other statement.
Fixes PR30652.
Patch by Paweł Żukowski.
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons, alexfh, djasper
Subscribers: mgehre, omtcyfz, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26125
llvm-svn: 285999
The mock server was listening for only one packet (I forgot to put a loop around
it), which caused the client to stall in debug builds, as the timeout there is
1000 seconds. In case of a release builds the test would just silently succeed as
the tested function does not check or report errors (which should be fixed).
This fixes the test by adding the server loop. Since the test was taking quite a
long time now (8s), I have added a parameter to control the amount of data sent
(default 4MB), and call it with a smaller value in the test, to make the test run
faster.
llvm-svn: 285992
SequenceNumberManager.
Sadly, we don't have any unittests for this class because it is
a private class. Since it seems to have a nice isolated and testable
interface, it'd be great to extract it to a detail namespace and write
unit tests for it as then we could catch issues. I'll probably pester
Lang about that or some alternative refactoring.
This was noticed by PVS-Studio.
llvm-svn: 285990
insufficient to populate the expected struct. Prior to this we already
bailed out of the routine when this situation comes up, so none of this
code had any effect.
If someone wants to bring it back to handle these cases, fixing the
earlier conditions and adding the necessary test cases that actually
exercises it, they can always revert this and go from there.
Both of these were noticed by PVS-Studio due to the identical (dead)
condition.
llvm-svn: 285989
instruction.
This avoids dereferencing null in the debug logging if the instruction
was not in fact a return instruction. This potential bug was found by
PVS-Studio.
This actually fixes the last of the "dereferenced a pointer before
checking it for null" reports in the recent PVS-Studio run. However,
there are quite a few reports of this nature that I did not do anything
to fix because they are pretty glaring false positives. They usually
took the form of quite clear correlated checks or a check made in
a separate function. I've even added asserts anywhere this correlation
wasn't pretty obvious and fundamental to the code.
llvm-svn: 285988
of which that is hidden inside a separate function call) and helpfully
before building expensive transaction infrastructure. This will avoid
crashing when running CGP in a generic mode if we ever managed to hit
this case.
Note that I spent some time looking at alternatives. CGP is actually
used without a TM or TLI in order to do some target-independent testing.
Further, all of the neighboring optimization techniques actually have
some paths that are effective even in the absence of TLI so this seemed
the correct scope at which to check and bypass logic. It still isn't
clear that long-term support for missing TM/TLI is the right
cost/benefit tradeoff for CGP -- we seem to get relatively little for it
and the code is just littered with checks (and assumptions which
I suspect are still missing some checks).
This at least fixes the potential bug in this code spotted by
PVS-Studio, so we've got that going for us. ;]
llvm-svn: 285987
which guarantee pointers are not null. These all seem to have useful
properties and correlations to document, in one case we even had it in
a comment but now it will also be an assert.
This should prevent PVS-Studio from incorrectly claiming that there are
a bunch of potential bugs here. But I feel really strongly that the
PVS-Studio warnings that pointed at this code have a far too high
false-positive rate to be entirely useful. These are just places where
there did seem to be a useful invariant to document and verify with an
assert. Several other places in the code were already correct and
already have perfectly clear code documenting and validating their
invariants, but still ran afoul of PVS-Studio.
llvm-svn: 285985
The exact same test guards entry into the loop in which this test
occurs, and there is nothing inside the loop that assigns to the
variable, so it has already been checked for null.
This was flagged by PVS-Studio as well, but the report is actually wrong
-- this is not a case where we dereference a variable prior to testing
it for null, this is a case where we have a redundant test for null
after we already performed the exact same test.
llvm-svn: 285983
corresponds to another argument being valid.
This makes it clear that the code is correct despite the PVS-Studio
report that a pointer might be dereferenced prior to being checked for
whether it is null. It likely is also enough for static analyzers to not
flag the code.
llvm-svn: 285982
Present tests for the functionality provided by command lime option
`-ast-print` check only absence of crash. This change tries to make
testing better, - the output produced by the compiler is compiled again
with option `-print-ast` and both outputs are compared. Such test at
least checks that the output is valid code. This change fixes only the
test for pure C.
This is recommit of r285882.
llvm-svn: 285981
dereferenced the pointer at this point, and these routines are
exclusively called after the parser encounters a code completion token.
Other code completion routines called at that point do not check for
null either, so this is clearly the current invariant expected in the
code.
This fixes another PVS-Studio found issue.
llvm-svn: 285980
behind the test that the MachineModuleInfo analysis was
actually available and can be used.
While the MachO bits may well be reasonable to assume in the darwin
assembly printer, the analysis isn't constructively guaranteed anywhere
I could find so it seems safest to avoid crashing here.
This issue was found with PVS-Studio. Pretty sure the Clang Static
Anaylzer flags similar issues but we've probably never pointed it at
this code effectively.
llvm-svn: 285972
This fixes a mismatch between the declared error_type and the type used with
the placement new that initializes the field.
Patch by Yichao Yu.
llvm-svn: 285970
Summary: ARMv6m supports dmb etc fench instructions but not ldrex/strex etc. So for some atomic load/store, LLVM should inline instructions instead of lowering to __sync_ calls.
Reviewers: rengolin, efriedma, t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: efriedma, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26120
llvm-svn: 285969
Craig Topper