I tried to silence lit with `| count 0`, which did not work.
Other testcases did not have `-- --` but only `--` in the RUN line.
Maybe this fixes the problem.
llvm-svn: 314812
This patch removes the targetspecification of a testcase, that broke
for ARM. The underlying problem was fixed which makes it unnecessary to
specify the target architecture (problem was the signedness of `char`).
Committing without review was accepted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D38399
by aaron.ballman.
llvm-svn: 314811
The bug happened with stream operations, that were not recognized in all cases.
Even there were already existing test for streaming classes, they did not catch this bug.
Adding the isolated example to the existing tests did not trigger the bug.
Therefore i created a new isolated file that did expose the bug indeed.
Differential: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38399
reviewed by aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 314808
Summary:
The client can send notifications when it detects watched files have
changed. This patch adds the protocol handling for this type of notification.
For now, the notification will be passed down to the ClangdServer, but it will
not be acted upon. However, this will become useful for the indexer to react
to file changes.
The events could also potentially be used to invalidate other caches
(compilation database, etc).
This change also updates the VSCode extension so that it sends the events.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Andre Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com>
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, Nebiroth
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38422
llvm-svn: 314693
Summary: Adds compileCommands command line argument to specify an absolute path directly to the requested compile_commands.json for flags.
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37150
llvm-svn: 314678
Summary:
There doesn't seem to be any real separation between the current three objects.
Feel free to reject this if you find the current style valuable, though.
(Mostly I'm just looking around for cleanups to help me understand the code).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38414
llvm-svn: 314587
Summary:
Completion results look much nicer without them.
Informative qualifiers are stored for every method from a base class, even when
calling those methods does not require any qualifiers. For example,
struct Foo { int foo(); };
struct Bar : Foo { };
void test() { Bar(). // Completion item label was 'Foo::foo' before,
// but inserted text was simply 'foo'.
// We now simply show 'foo' in completion item label.
They effectively cluttered the completion list without providing much value.
Reviewers: bkramer, krasimir, rwols
Reviewed By: rwols
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38083
llvm-svn: 314445
Summary:
Small extension to LSP to allow clients to use clangd to switch between C header files and source files.
Final version will use the completed clangd indexer to use the index of symbols to be able to switch from header to source file when the file names don't match.
Reviewers: malaperle, krasimir, bkramer, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, cfe-commits, arphaman
Patch by: William Enright
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36150
llvm-svn: 314377
Summary:
The root Uri is the workspace location and will be useful in the context of
indexing. We could also add more things to InitializeParams in order to
configure Clangd for C/C++ sepecific extensions.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, bkramer, krasimir, Nebiroth
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38093
llvm-svn: 314309
Summary:
Calls to onDiagnosticsReady were done concurrently before. This sometimes
led to older versions of diagnostics being reported to the user after
the newer versions.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, krasimir
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38032
llvm-svn: 313754
Summary:
Fix for bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34559
Also log unknown fields instead of aborting the JSON parsing because it's
common that new optional fields are added either in new versions of the protocol
or extensions.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37754
llvm-svn: 313536
This is a resubmission of r313270. It broke standalone builds of
compiler-rt because we were not correctly generating the llvm-lit
script in the standalone build directory.
The fixes incorporated here attempt to find llvm/utils/llvm-lit
from the source tree returned by llvm-config. If present, it
will generate llvm-lit into the output directory. Regardless,
the user can specify -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT to point to a specific
lit.py on their file system. This supports the use case of
someone installing lit via a package manager. If it cannot find
a source tree, and -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT is either unspecified or
invalid, then we print a warning that tests will not be able
to run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756
llvm-svn: 313407
Summary:
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34449
**Problem:**
Clang-tidy check misc-unused-parameters comments out parameter name omitting following characters (e.g. square brackets) what results in its complete removal. Compilation errors might occur after clang-tidy fix as well.
**Patch description:**
Changed removal range. The range should end after parameter name, not after whole parameter declarator (which might be followed by e.g. square brackets).
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Pawel Maciocha!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37846
llvm-svn: 313355
This patch is still breaking several multi-stage compiler-rt bots.
I already know what the fix is, but I want to get the bots green
for now and then try re-applying in the morning.
llvm-svn: 313335
This patch simplifies LLVM's lit infrastructure by enforcing an ordering
that a site config is always run before a source-tree config.
A significant amount of the complexity from lit config files arises from
the fact that inside of a source-tree config file, we don't yet know if
the site config has been run. However it is *always* required to run
a site config first, because it passes various variables down through
CMake that the main config depends on. As a result, every config
file has to do a bunch of magic to try to reverse-engineer the location
of the site config file if they detect (heuristically) that the site
config file has not yet been run.
This patch solves the problem by emitting a mapping from source tree
config file to binary tree site config file in llvm-lit.py. Then, during
discovery when we find a config file, we check to see if we have a
target mapping for it, and if so we use that instead.
This mechanism is generic enough that it does not affect external users
of lit. They will just not have a config mapping defined, and everything
will work as normal.
On the other hand, for us it allows us to make many simplifications:
* We are guaranteed that a site config will be executed first
* Inside of a main config, we no longer have to assume that attributes
might not be present and use getattr everywhere.
* We no longer have to pass parameters such as --param llvm_site_config=<path>
on the command line.
* It is future-proof, meaning you don't have to edit llvm-lit.in to add
support for new projects.
* All of the duplicated logic of trying various fallback mechanisms of
finding a site config from the main config are now gone.
One potentially noteworthy thing that was required to implement this
change is that whereas the ninja check targets previously used the first
method to spawn lit, they now use the second. In particular, you can no
longer run lit.py against the source tree while specifying the various
`foo_site_config=<path>` parameters. Instead, you need to run
llvm-lit.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756
llvm-svn: 313270
Summary:
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34450
**Problem:**
Clang-tidy check misc-unused-parameters omits parameter default value what results in its complete removal. Compilation errors might occur after clang-tidy fix.
**Patch description:**
Changed removal range. The range should end after parameter declarator, not after whole parameter declaration (which might contain a default value).
Reviewers: alexfh, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Pawel Maciocha!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37566
llvm-svn: 313150
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Codereview in D36354
llvm-svn: 313067
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Please give your comments :)
llvm-svn: 313043
This check is relatively simple, and is often being used
as an example. I'm aware of at least two cases, when
simply copying the FunctionASTVisitor class to a new
check resulted in a rather unobvious segfault. Having it
in anonymous namespace prevents such a problem.
No functionality change, so i opted to avoid phabricator,
especially since clang-tidy reviews are seriously jammed.
llvm-svn: 312912
This patch will introduce even more aliases for the hicpp-module to already existing
checks and is a follow up for D30383 finishing the other sections.
It fixes a forgotten highlight in hicpp-braces-around-statements.rst, too.
llvm-svn: 312901
Summary:
The language server protocol specified 2 headers (Content-Length and Content-Type), but does not specify their sequence. It specifies that an empty line ends
headers. Clangd has been updated to handle arbitrary sequences of headers, extracting only the content length.
Patch by puremourning (Ben Jackson).
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37282
llvm-svn: 312483
Summary:
This patch is a followup to the first revision D36583, that had problems with
generic code and its diagnostic messages, which were found by @lebedev.ri
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: klimek, sbenza, cfe-commits, JDevlieghere, lebedev.ri, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37060
llvm-svn: 312134
Jonas Toth