This patch enables instructions that are destructive on their
destination- and first source operand, to be prefixed with a
MOVPRFX instruction.
This patch also adds a variety of tests:
- positive tests for all instructions and forms that accept a
movprfx for either or both predicated and unpredicated forms.
- negative tests for all instructions and forms that do not accept
an unpredicated or predicated movprfx.
- negative tests for the diagnostics that get emitted when a MOVPRFX
instruction is used incorrectly.
This is patch [2/2] in a series to add MOVPRFX instructions:
- Patch [1/2]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49592
- Patch [2/2]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49593
Reviewers: rengolin, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, fhahn, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49593
llvm-svn: 338261
For regular SVE vector operands, this patch introduces a more
sensible diagnostic when the vector has a wrong suffix (e.g. z0.s vs z0.b).
For example:
add z0.s, z1.s, z2.b -> invalid element width
^_____^
mismatch
For the vector-with-shift/extend (e.g. z0.s, uxtw #2) this patch takes
a slightly different approach and instead returns a 'invalid operand'
if the element size is not as expected. This is because the diagnostics
are more specificied to suggest using the right shift/extend suffix. This
is a trade-off not to introduce more operand classes and still provide
useful diagnostics for LD1 and PRF instructions.
For example:
ld1w z1.s, p0/z, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].s, (uxtw|sxtw)'
ld1w z1.d, p0/z, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid operand
^________________^
mismatch
For gather prefetches, both 'z0.s' and 'z0.d' would be allowed:
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].s, (uxtw|sxtw) #2'
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.d] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].d, (lsl|uxtw|sxtw) #2'
Without this change, the diagnostic would unnecessarily suggest a
different element size:
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].d, (lsl|uxtw|sxtw) #2'
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, aemerson, fhahn, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46688
llvm-svn: 332483
Sander de Smalen