Commit Graph

16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hans Wennborg c9bd88e681 Remove the -cxx-abi command-line flag.
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.

To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545

llvm-svn: 199250
2014-01-14 19:35:09 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 442e4f7f5f Prepare for using MS ABI by default for Win32: update CodeGenCXX tests
llvm-svn: 197281
2013-12-13 22:43:52 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 8b5987eba5 Abstract out the emission of vtables, add basic support for vtable emission when using -cxx-abi microsoft
Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1532

llvm-svn: 191523
2013-09-27 14:48:01 +00:00
Stephen Lin 9dc6eef755 Restore r184205 and associated commits (after commit of r185290)
This allows clang to use the backend parameter attribute 'returned' when generating 'this'-returning constructors and destructors in ARM and MSVC C++ ABIs.

llvm-svn: 185291
2013-06-30 20:40:16 +00:00
Stephen Lin 19cee1871e Revert r184205 and associated patches while investigating issue with broken buildbot (possible interaction with LTO)
<rdar://problem/14209661>

llvm-svn: 184384
2013-06-19 23:23:19 +00:00
Stephen Lin 6d51d86698 Fix C++ constructor/destructor tests when run on ARM
llvm-svn: 184225
2013-06-18 20:24:04 +00:00
Eli Friedman 50ed150632 Whack a bunch of tests in CodeGenCXX to work on ARM (using ARM ABI). Batch 2 of 3.
llvm-svn: 133011
2011-06-14 21:20:53 +00:00
Anders Carlsson d6f1518cc9 Fix another regression from the "skip vtable pointer initialization"
optimization. Make sure to require a vtable when trying to get the address
of a VTT, otherwise we would never end up emitting the VTT.

llvm-svn: 131400
2011-05-16 04:08:36 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 05842dabb8 Move unnamed_addr after the function arguments on Sabre's request.
llvm-svn: 124210
2011-01-25 19:10:24 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 0ee986c1f1 Add unnamed_addr to constructors and destructors.
llvm-svn: 123197
2011-01-11 00:26:26 +00:00
John McCall 6a7f9f5c8f Don't try to emit the vtable for a class just because we're emitting a
virtual function from it.

Fixes PR7241.

llvm-svn: 105345
2010-06-02 21:22:02 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 88d292ccb8 Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions. 

The new scheme:
  - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
  the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
  function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
  dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
  to/through a virtual base class, etc.
  - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
  indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
  unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
  delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
  occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
 - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
 functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
 function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
 member functions when needed.
  - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
  ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
  them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
  vtables lazily). 

From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).

Notes:
  (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
  vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
  the larger tests from these issues.
  (2) Some diagnostics related to
  implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
  have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
  way.
  (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
  see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
  vtable.

Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.

llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-13 16:44:06 +00:00
Rafael Espindola e7113ca907 Delay codegen of vtables when handling implicit instantiations.
This fixes PR6474.

llvm-svn: 98123
2010-03-10 02:19:29 +00:00
John McCall 5c60a6f597 Make deleting and complete dtor variants defer to other dtor variants by
calling them as subroutines.  This triggers whenever the alias optimization
doesn't, i.e. when the dtor has linkonce linkage or there are virtual bases
or it's the deleting dtor.

llvm-svn: 96605
2010-02-18 19:59:28 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Fariborz Jahanian b0cd26ad21 Test for my last patch.
llvm-svn: 90159
2009-11-30 22:07:56 +00:00