Adds -L<search-path> and -l<library> options that are analogous to ld's
versions.
Each instance of -L<search-path> or -l<library> will apply to the most recent
-jd option on the command line (-jd <name> creates a JITDylib with the given
name). Library names will match against JITDylibs first, then llvm-jitlink will
look through the search paths for files named <search-path>/lib<library>.dylib
or <search-path>/lib<library>.a.
The default "main" JITDylib will link against all JITDylibs created by -jd
options, and all JITDylibs will link against the process symbols (unless
-no-process-symbols is specified).
The -dlopen option is renamed -preload, and will load dylibs into the JITDylib
for the ORC runtime only.
The effect of these changes is to make it easier to describe a non-trivial
program layout to llvm-jitlink for testing purposes. E.g. the following
invocation describes a program consisting of three JITDylibs: "main" (created
implicitly) containing main.o, "Foo" containing foo1.o and foo2.o, and linking
against library "bar" (not a JITDylib, so it must be a .dylib or .a on disk)
and "Baz" (which is a JITDylib), and "Baz" containing baz.o.
llvm-jitlink \
main.o \
-jd Foo foo1.o foo2.o -L${HOME}/lib -lbar -lBaz
-jd Baz baz.o
This change moves optimized callbacks from each .o file to compiler-rt. Instead of using code generation it uses direct assembly implementation. Please note that the 'or' version is not implemented and it will produce unresolved external if somehow 'or' version is requested.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114558
This change switches tsan to the new runtime which features:
- 2x smaller shadow memory (2x of app memory)
- faster fully vectorized race detection
- small fixed-size vector clocks (512b)
- fast vectorized vector clock operations
- unlimited number of alive threads/goroutimes
Depends on D112602.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112603
Currently the test calls dlclose in the thread
concurrently with the main thread calling a function
from the dynamic library. This is not good.
Wait for the main thread to call the function
before calling dlclose.
Depends on D115612.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115613
The test contains a race and checks that it's detected.
But the race may not be detected since we are doing aggressive flushes
and if the state flush happens between racing accesses, tsan won't
detect the race). So return 1 to make the test deterministic
regardless of the race.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115612
This change moves optimized callbacks from each .o file to compiler-rt. Instead of using code generation it uses direct assembly implementation. Please note that the 'or' version is not implemented and it will produce unresolved external if somehow 'or' version is requested.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114558
This change moves optimized callbacks from each .o file to compiler-rt. Instead of using code generation it uses direct assembly implementation. Please note that the 'or' version is not implemented and it will produce unresolved external if somehow 'or' version is requested.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114558
The test has been flaky for years, and I think we should remove it to
eliminate noise on the buildbot.
Neither me nor dokyungs have been able to fully deflake the test, and it
tests a non-default Entropic flag.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115453
This reverts commit e5c2a46c5e as this
change introduced a linker error when building sanitizer runtimes:
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __sanitizer::internal_start_thread(void* (*)(void*), void*)
>>> referenced by sanitizer_stackdepot.cpp:133 (compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stackdepot.cpp:133)
>>> compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommonSymbolizer.x86_64.dir/sanitizer_stackdepot.cpp.obj:(__sanitizer::(anonymous namespace)::CompressThread::NewWorkNotify())
This change switches tsan to the new runtime which features:
- 2x smaller shadow memory (2x of app memory)
- faster fully vectorized race detection
- small fixed-size vector clocks (512b)
- fast vectorized vector clock operations
- unlimited number of alive threads/goroutimes
Depends on D112602.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112603
This change moves optimized callbacks from each .o file to compiler-rt. Instead of using code generation it uses direct assembly implementation. Please note that the 'or' version is not implemented and it will produce unresolved external if somehow 'or' version is requested.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114558
We call UnmapShadow before the actual munmap, at that point we don't yet
know if the provided address/size are sane. We can't call UnmapShadow
after the actual munmap becuase at that point the memory range can
already be reused for something else, so we can't rely on the munmap
return value to understand is the values are sane.
While calling munmap with insane values (non-canonical address, negative
size, etc) is an error, the kernel won't crash. We must also try to not
crash as the failure mode is very confusing (paging fault inside of the
runtime on some derived shadow address).
Such invalid arguments are observed on Chromium tests:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1275581
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114944
The added test demonstrates loading a dynamic library with static TLS.
Such static TLS is a hack that allows a dynamic library to have faster TLS,
but it can be loaded only iff all threads happened to allocate some excess
of static TLS space for whatever reason. If it's not the case loading fails with:
dlopen: cannot load any more object with static TLS
We used to produce a false positive because dlopen will write into TLS
of all existing threads to initialize/zero TLS region for the loaded library.
And this appears to be racing with initialization of TLS in the thread
since we model a write into the whole static TLS region (we don't what part
of it is currently unused):
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=2317365)
Write of size 1 at 0x7f1fa9bfcdd7 by main thread:
0 memset
1 init_one_static_tls
2 __pthread_init_static_tls
[[ this is where main calls dlopen ]]
3 main
Previous write of size 8 at 0x7f1fa9bfcdd0 by thread T1:
0 __tsan_tls_initialization
Fix this by ignoring accesses during dlopen.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114953
Larger blocks are more convenient for compressions.
Blocks are allocated with MmapNoReserveOrDie to save some memory.
Also it's 15% faster on StackDepotBenchmarkSuite
Depends on D114464.
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114488
Sometimes stacks for at_exit callbacks don't include any of the user functions/files.
For example, a race with a global std container destructor will only contain
the container type name and our at_exit_wrapper function. No signs what global variable
this is.
Remember and include in reports the function that installed the at_exit callback.
This should give glues as to what variable is being destroyed.
Depends on D114606.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114607
Add a test for a common C++ bug when a global object is destroyed
while background threads still use it.
Depends on D114604.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114605
This change switches tsan to the new runtime which features:
- 2x smaller shadow memory (2x of app memory)
- faster fully vectorized race detection
- small fixed-size vector clocks (512b)
- fast vectorized vector clock operations
- unlimited number of alive threads/goroutimes
Depends on D112602.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112603
We currently use a wrong value for heap block
(only works for C++, but not for Java).
Use the correct value (we already computed it before, just forgot to use).
Depends on D114593.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114595
Lang Hames