Commit Graph

18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel b37145712e [InstCombine] replace divide-by-constant checks with asserts; NFC
These folds already have tests for scalar and vector types, except 
for the vector div-by-0 case, so I'm adding tests for that.

llvm-svn: 280115
2016-08-30 17:31:34 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 69632447b1 [InstSimplify] regenerate checks using a script
I didn't notice any significant changes in the actual checks here;
all of these tests already used FileCheck, so a script can batch
update them in one shot.

This commit is just to show the value of automating this process: 
We have uniform formatting as opposed to a mish-mash of check
structure that changes based on individual prefs and the current
fashion. This makes it simpler to update when we find a bug or
make an enhancement.

llvm-svn: 264457
2016-03-25 20:12:25 +00:00
Justin Bogner 08154bf3d2 IR: Make the X / undef -> undef fold match the comment
The constant folding for sdiv and udiv has a big discrepancy between the
comments and the code, which looks like a typo. Currently, we're folding
X / undef pretty inconsistently:

  0 / undef -> undef
  C / undef -> 0
  undef / undef -> 0

Whereas the comments state we do X / undef -> undef. The logic that
returns zero is actually commented as doing undef / X -> 0, despite that
the LHS isn't undef in many of the cases that hit it.

llvm-svn: 261813
2016-02-25 01:02:18 +00:00
David Majnemer 599ca4426c [InstSimplify] Teach InstSimplify how to simplify extractelement
llvm-svn: 242008
2015-07-13 01:15:53 +00:00
David Blaikie 23af64846f [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to the call instruction
See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load
respectively.

Call is a bit different because it often doesn't have a single explicit
type - usually the type is deduced from the arguments, and just the
return type is explicit. In those cases there's no need to change the
IR.

When that's not the case, the IR usually contains the pointer type of
the first operand - but since typed pointers are going away, that
representation is insufficient so I'm just stripping the "pointerness"
of the explicit type away.

This does make the IR a bit weird - it /sort of/ reads like the type of
the first operand: "call void () %x(" but %x is actually of type "void
()*" and will eventually be just of type "ptr". But this seems not too
bad and I don't think it would benefit from repeating the type
("void (), void () * %x(" and then eventually "void (), ptr %x(") as has
been done with gep and load.

This also has a side benefit: since the explicit type is no longer a
pointer, there's no ambiguity between an explicit type and a function
that returns a function pointer. Previously this case needed an explicit
type (eg: a function returning a void() function was written as
"call void () () * @x(" rather than "call void () * @x(" because of the
ambiguity between a function returning a pointer to a void() function
and a function returning void).

No ambiguity means even function pointer return types can just be
written alone, without writing the whole function's type.

This leaves /only/ the varargs case where the explicit type is required.

Given the special type syntax in call instructions, the regex-fu used
for migration was a bit more involved in its own unique way (as every
one of these is) so here it is. Use it in conjunction with the apply.sh
script and associated find/xargs commands I've provided in rr230786 to
migrate your out of tree tests. Do let me know if any of this doesn't
cover your cases & we can iterate on a more general script/regexes to
help others with out of tree tests.

About 9 test cases couldn't be automatically migrated - half of those
were functions returning function pointers, where I just had to manually
delete the function argument types now that we didn't need an explicit
function type there. The other half were typedefs of function types used
in calls - just had to manually drop the * from those.

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r'((?:=|:|^|\s)call\s(?:[^@]*?))(\s*$|\s*(?:(?:\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\]\]|[@%](?:(")?[\\\?@a-zA-Z0-9_.]*?(?(3)"|)|{{.*}}))(?:\(|$)|undef|inttoptr|bitcast|null|asm).*$)')
addrspace_end = re.compile(r"addrspace\(\d+\)\s*\*$")
func_end = re.compile("(?:void.*|\)\s*)\*$")

def conv(match, line):
  if not match or re.search(addrspace_end, match.group(1)) or not re.search(func_end, match.group(1)):
    return line
  return line[:match.start()] + match.group(1)[:match.group(1).rfind('*')].rstrip() + match.group(2) + line[match.end():]

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(conv(re.search(pat, line), line))

llvm-svn: 235145
2015-04-16 23:24:18 +00:00
David Majnemer 824e011ad7 ConstantFold: Shifting undef by zero results in undef
llvm-svn: 224553
2014-12-18 23:54:43 +00:00
David Majnemer 65c52ae8ca InstSimplify: shl nsw/nuw undef, %V -> undef
We can always choose an value for undef which might cause %V to shift
out an important bit except for one case, when %V is zero.

However, shl behaves like an identity function when the right hand side
is zero.

llvm-svn: 224405
2014-12-17 01:54:33 +00:00
David Majnemer f532fcb889 InstSimplify: Remove usesless %a parameter from tests
No functional change intended.

llvm-svn: 224016
2014-12-11 12:56:17 +00:00
David Majnemer 89cf6d79eb ConstantFold: an undef shift amount results in undef
X shifted by undef results in undef because the undef value can
represent values greater than the width of the operands.

llvm-svn: 223968
2014-12-10 21:38:05 +00:00
David Majnemer 7b86b77248 ConstantFold: div undef, 0 should fold to undef, not zero
Dividing by zero yields an undefined value.

llvm-svn: 223924
2014-12-10 09:14:55 +00:00
David Majnemer ae707582c0 InstSimplify: [al]shr exact undef, %X -> undef
Exact shifts always keep the non-zero bits of their input.  This means
it keeps it's undef bits.

llvm-svn: 223923
2014-12-10 09:14:52 +00:00
David Majnemer 71dc8fb867 InstSimplify: div %X, 0 -> undef
We already optimized rem %X, 0 to undef, we should do the same for div.

llvm-svn: 223919
2014-12-10 07:52:18 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 5e1794eedb InstSimplify: Make shift, select and GEP simplifications vector-aware.
llvm-svn: 200016
2014-01-24 17:09:53 +00:00
Dan Gohman ce3d6248b2 Add tests for existing InstSimplify features.
llvm-svn: 143721
2011-11-04 18:39:16 +00:00
Dan Gohman 85977e6ab4 Teach instsimplify to simplify calls to undef.
llvm-svn: 143719
2011-11-04 18:32:42 +00:00
Dan Gohman 54664ed714 Improve constant folding of undef for cmp and select operators.
llvm-svn: 134223
2011-07-01 01:03:43 +00:00