Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matt Arsenault 9cac4e6d14 Rename ExpandISelPseudo->FinalizeISel, delay register reservation
This allows targets to make more decisions about reserved registers
after isel. For example, now it should be certain there are calls or
stack objects in the frame or not, which could have been introduced by
legalization.

Patch by Matthias Braun

llvm-svn: 363757
2019-06-19 00:25:39 +00:00
Matthias Braun a83403892a MachineOperand/MIParser: Do not print debug-use flag, infer it
The debug-use flag must be set exactly for uses on DBG_VALUEs.  This is
so obvious that it can be trivially inferred while parsing. This will
reduce noise when printing while omitting an information that has little
value to the user.

The parser will keep recognizing the flag for compatibility with old
`.mir` files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53903

llvm-svn: 345671
2018-10-30 23:28:27 +00:00
Shiva Chen 2c864551df [DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is

!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)

We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is

llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)

It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.

We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024

Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.

llvm-svn: 331841
2018-05-09 02:40:45 +00:00
Puyan Lotfi 43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih c71cced0aa [CodeGen] Always use `printReg` to print registers in both MIR and debug
output

As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.

Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421

llvm-svn: 319445
2017-11-30 16:12:24 +00:00
Justin Bogner 6c452834a1 MIR: Print the register class or bank in vreg defs
This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing
virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the
parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank,

  %1(s64) = COPY %0(s64)

would now be written as

  %1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64)

While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the
registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise
and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the
registers block completely.

Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one
exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print
the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in
meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier
both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation
where we can print something we can't parse.

llvm-svn: 316479
2017-10-24 18:04:54 +00:00
Bjorn Pettersson 90cc1b53d0 [DebugInfo] Handle endianness when moving debug info for split integer values (reapplied)
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.

This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.

I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.

Original patch was reverted due to using -stop-after=isel in
the test case (but that is only working when AMDGPU target
is included in the llc build). The test case has now been
updated to use -stop-before=expand-isel-pseudos instead.

Patch by: dstenb

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie

Subscribers: nemanjai

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172

llvm-svn: 314781
2017-10-03 11:03:02 +00:00
Tim Shen 59465d29f8 [PowerPC] Revert r314666.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172.

I tried to XFAIL it, but sometimes XPASS triggers the bot. Simply
revert it.

llvm-svn: 314739
2017-10-02 23:20:06 +00:00
Tim Shen 7b8928c729 [PowerPC] Temporarily disable the test introduced by r314666
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172 for details.

llvm-svn: 314732
2017-10-02 22:40:32 +00:00
Bjorn Pettersson 839775a277 [Debug info] Handle endianness when moving debug info for split integer values
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.

This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.

I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.

Patch by: dstenb

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie

Subscribers: nemanjai

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172

llvm-svn: 314666
2017-10-02 12:46:32 +00:00