llvm-cov writes out an index file in '-output-dir' mode, albeit not a
very informative one. Try to fix that by using the CoverageReport API to
include some basic summary information in the index file.
llvm-svn: 281011
It would be nice to prepare file reports (using the CoverageReport API)
without actually rendering them to the console. I plan on using this to
flesh out the 'index' files in the coverage views.
llvm-svn: 281009
This test should have broken after r280896. Fix up the test case
speculatively, since I don't have a way to test it.
I wonder why I didn't get any angry bot emails about this. Maybe none of
the win32 bots test llvm-cov? That could explain it, since the test says
it 'REQUIRES: system-windows', which is restricted to win32 hosts.
Also: why is 'system-windows' not defined for non-win32 Windows bots?
llvm-svn: 281008
The x64 ABI has two major function types:
- frame functions
- leaf functions
A frame function is one which requires a stack frame. A leaf function
is one which does not. A frame function may or may not have a frame
pointer.
A leaf function does not require a stack frame and may never modify SP
except via a return (RET, tail call via JMP).
A frame function which has a frame pointer is permitted to use the LEA
instruction in the epilogue, a frame function without which doesn't
establish a frame pointer must use ADD to adjust the stack pointer epilogue.
Fun fact: Leaf functions don't require a function table entry
(associated PDATA/XDATA).
llvm-svn: 281006
This adds more tests for shuffles where the output width does not match
the input width and/or the output is generated from more than two inputs.
llvm-svn: 281005
Usually, options that are longer than one character can be preceded
either by "-" or "--", but options starting with "o" are exceptions
because they conflict with "-o" option. They have to be preceded by
"--".
llvm-svn: 281004
The REX prefix should be used on indirect jmps, but not direct ones.
For direct jumps, the unwinder looks at the offset to determine if
it's inside the current function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24359
llvm-svn: 281003
We still have to skip a token inside SEARCH_DIR() when -nostdlib is
specified. Previuosly, we didn't skip it, so it caused a parse error.
llvm-svn: 281001
Summary: The hoisted instruction is executed speculatively. It could affect the debugging experience as user would see gdb go into code that may not be expected to execute. It will also affect sample profile accuracy by assigning incorrect frequency to source within then/else branch.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, chandlerc, kcc, echristo
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, probinson, eric_niebler, andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24164
llvm-svn: 280995
The test case included in r280979 wasn't checking what it was supposed to be
checking for the predicated store case. Fixing the test revealed that the
multi-use case (when a pointer is used by both vectorized and scalarized memory
accesses) wasn't being handled properly. We can't skip over
non-consecutive-like pointers since they may have looked consecutive-like with
a different memory access.
llvm-svn: 280992
lld differs from GNU ld in that it does not have a built-in default
target emulation. Emulation is always specified via the -m option, or
obtained from the object file(s) being linked. In most cases at least
one ELF object is included in the link, so the emulation is known.
When using lld's (not yet committed) -b binary support with -r, to
convert a binary file into an ELF object we do not have a known
emulation. The error message previously emitted in this case
"-m or at least a .o file required" is accurate but does not offer
much insight. Add text to the error message to give a hint why -m or an
object file is required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24348
llvm-svn: 280989
Visual Studio 2013 (CRT version 12) added support for many C99 long long and
long double functions. Visual Studio 2015 (CRT version 14) increased C99 and C11
compliance further. Since we don't support Visual Studio versions older than
2013, we can considerably clean up the support header.
Patch by Shoaib Meenai!
llvm-svn: 280988
In C mode, if we have a visible declaration but not a visible definition, a tag
defined in the declaration should be have a visible definition. In C++ we rely
on the ODR merging, whereas in C we cannot because each declaration of a
function gets its own set of declarations in its prototype scope.
Patch developed in collaboration with Richard Smith!
llvm-svn: 280984
A trailing _fbsd is stripped from emulation names, but if the result was
still not a valid emulation the error was somewhat confusing.
For example,
% ld.lld -m elf_amd64_fbsd
unknown emulation: elf_amd64
Use the original emulation name in error messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24357
llvm-svn: 280983
In the FreeBSD world x86_64 still has its original name, amd64. Accept
it as an alias.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24356
llvm-svn: 280982
The text and html coverage views take different approaches to emitting
highlighted regions. That's because this problem is easier in the text
view: there's no need to worry about escaping text or adding tooltip
content to a highlighted snippet.
Unfortunately, the html view didn't get region highlighting quite right.
This patch fixes the situation, bringing parity between the two views.
llvm-svn: 280981
Previously, all consecutive pointers were marked uniform after vectorization.
However, if a consecutive pointer is used by a memory access that is eventually
scalarized, the pointer won't remain uniform after all. An example is
predicated stores. Even though a predicated store may be consecutive, it will
still be scalarized, making it's pointer operand non-uniform.
This patch updates the logic in collectLoopUniforms to consider the cases where
a memory access may be scalarized. If a memory access may be scalarized, its
pointer operand is not marked uniform. The determination of whether a given
memory instruction will be scalarized or not has been moved into a common
function that is used by the vectorizer, cost model, and legality analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24271
llvm-svn: 280979
Previously we were making new instances of YamlTypeDumperCallbacks
in order to recurse down and serialize / deserialize nested
records such as field lists. This meant you could not pass
context from a higher operation to a lower operation because
it would be using a new instance of the visitor callback
delegate.
YAMLIO library was updated to support context-sensitive mappings,
so now we can reuse the same instance of the visitor callback
delegate even for nested operations.
llvm-svn: 280978
mapping a yaml field to an object in code has always been
a stateless operation. You could still pass state by using the
`setContext` function of the YAMLIO object, but this represented
global state for the entire yaml input. In order to have
context-sensitive state, it is necessary to pass this state in
at the granularity of an individual mapping.
This patch adds support for this type of context-sensitive state.
You simply pass an additional argument of type T to the
`mapRequired` or `mapOptional` functions, and provided you have
specialized a `MappingContextTraits<U, T>` class with the
appropriate mapping function, you can pass this context into
the mapping function.
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24162
llvm-svn: 280977
This reverts commit r280839.
It's problematic on OS X, where the '/Users/...' paths are interpreted
as '/U' options.
Investigation ongoing in http://llvm.org/PR30328.
llvm-svn: 280975
Fix the .arch asm parser to use the full set of features for the architecture
and any extensions on the command line. Add and update testcases accordingly
as well as add an extension that was used but not supported.
llvm-svn: 280971
And associated commits, as they broke the Thumb bots.
This reverts commit r280935.
This reverts commit r280891.
This reverts commit r280888.
llvm-svn: 280967
I introduced this potential bug by missing this diff in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL280873
...however, I'm not sure how to reach this code path with a regression test.
We may be able to remove this code and assume that the transform to a constant
is always handled by InstSimplify?
llvm-svn: 280964
Vedant Kumar