In ELF (as in MachO), not all relocations point to symbols. Represent this
properly by using a symbol_iterator instead of a SymbolRef. Update llvm-readobj
ELF's dumper to handle relocatios without symbols.
llvm-svn: 183284
handle temporaries which have been lifetime-extended to static storage duration
within constant expressions. This correctly handles nested lifetime extension
(through reference members of aggregates in aggregate initializers) but
non-constant-expression emission hasn't yet been updated to do the same.
llvm-svn: 183283
the link register save location being in the link register - in which case we
should iterate down the stack, not recursively try to find the lr in the current
frame over and over.
<rdar://problem/13932954>
llvm-svn: 183282
Two things:
1) fixing a bug where memory read was not clearing the m_force flag after it was passed, so that subsequent memory reads would not need to be forced even if over boundary
2) adding a setting target.max-memory-read-size that you can set instead of the hardcoded 1024 bytes limit we had before
llvm-svn: 183276
Performance timers captured in each transform for all files they process are now collected and arranged per source file in preparation for writing to disk.
This revision is the last piece of the initial implementation of performance timer capturing.
llvm-svn: 183274
If you want to define a formatter for "array of Foo of any size", ordinarily you would say
-x "Foo \[[0-9]+\]"
this checkin allows you to instead say "Foo[]" (or "Foo []") and LLDB will automatically create the regular expression and add the -x flag on your behalf
llvm-svn: 183272
Accept mach-o files with bad segments. Many core files are not created correctly and we should still be able to glean any information we can from them.
llvm-svn: 183247
LLDB API versioning
This checkin makes the LLDB API versioned
We are starting at version 1.0 and will then revise and update the API from there
Further details:
API versioning
---------------------------------
The LLDB API is versioned independently of the LLDB source base
Our API version numbers are composed of a major and a minor number
The major number means a complete and stable revision of the API. Major numbers are compatibility breakers
(i.e. when we change the API major number, there is no promise of compatibility with the previous major version
and we are free to remove and/or change any APIs)
Minor numbers are a work-in-progress evolution of the API. APIs will not be removed or changed across minor versions
(minors do not break compatibility). However, we can deprecate APIs in minor versions or add new APIs in minor versions
A deprecated API is supposedly going to be removed in the next major version and will generate a warning if used
APIs we add in minor versions will not be removed (at least until the following major) but they might theoretically be deprecated
in a following minor version
Users are discouraged from using the LLDB version number to test for API features and should instead use the API version checking
as discussed below
API version checking
---------------------------------
You can (optionally) sign into an API version checking feature
To do so you need to define three macros:
LLDB_API_CHECK_VERSIONING - define to any value (or no value)
LLDB_API_MAJOR_VERSION_WANTED - which major version of the LLDB API you are targeting
LLDB_API_MINOR_VERSION_WANTED - which minor version of the LLDB API you are targeting
If these macros exist - LLDB will enable version checking of the public API
If LLDB_API_MAJOR_VERSION is not equal to LLDB_API_MAJOR_VERSION_WANTED we will immediately halt your compilation with an error
This is by design, since we do not make any promise of compatibility across major versions - if you really want to test your luck, disable the versioning altogether
If the major version test passes, you have signed up for a specific minor version of the API
Whenever we add or deprecate an API in a minor version, we will mark it with either
LLDB_API_NEW_IN_DOT_x - this API is new in LLDB .x
LLDB_API_DEPRECATED_IN_DOT_x - this API is deprecated as of .x
If you are using an API new in DOT_x
if LLDB_API_MINOR_VERSION_WANTED >= x then all is well, else you will get a compilation error
This is meant to prevent you from using APIs that are newer than whatever LLDB you want to target
If you are using an API deprecated in DOT_x
if LLDB_API_MINOR_VERSION_WANTED >= x then you will get a compilation warning, else all is well
This is meant to let you know that you are using an API that is deprecated and might go away
Caveats
---------------------------------
Version checking only works on clang on OSX - you will get an error if you try to enable it on any other OS/compiler
If you want to enable version checking on other platforms, you will need to define appropriate implementations for
LLDB_API_IMPL_DEPRECATED and LLDB_API_IMPL_TOONEW and any other infrastructure your compiler needs for this purpose
We have no deprecation-as-error mode
There is no support for API versioning in Python
We reserve to use macros whose names begin with LLDB_API_ and you should not use them in your source code as they might conflict
with present or future macro names we are using to implement versioning
For API implementors:
If you need to add a new public API call, please remember to add the LLDB_API_NEW_IN_DOT_x marker in the header file
and when you are done with adding stuff, to also update LLDB_API_MINOR_VERSION
If you want to remove a function, deprecate it first, by using LLDB_API_DEPRECATED_IN_DOT_x
and when you are done with deprecating stuff, to also update LLDB_API_MINOR_VERSION
A new major version (LLDB_API_MAJOR_VERSION++) is your only chance to remove and/or change API calls
but is probably quite a big deal and you might want to consider deprecating the existing calls for a while
before doing your changes
A couple more caveats:
Currently, the lldb-tool does NOT use the version checking feature. It would be a nice future improvement to make it do that, once we have proper version checking on other OSs
APIs marked as deprecated by a comment in the source are still deprecated just that way. A good purpose for API 1.1 might be to deprecate them with appropriate markers
llvm-svn: 183244
IndVarSimplify is willing to move divide instructions outside of their
loop bodies if they are invariant of the loop. However, it may not be
safe to expand them if we do not know if they can trap.
Instead, check to see if it is not safe to expand the instruction and
skip the expansion.
This fixes PR16041.
Testcase by Rafael Ávila de Espíndola.
llvm-svn: 183239
The ARM backend did not expect LDRBi12 to hold a constant pool operand.
Allow for LLVM to deal with the instruction similar to how it deals with
LDRi12.
This fixes PR16215.
llvm-svn: 183238
Consider the case where a SwitchStmt satisfied isAllEnumCasesCovered()
as well as having no cases at all (i.e. the enum it covers has no
enumerators).
In this case, we should add a successor to repair the CFG.
This fixes PR16212.
llvm-svn: 183237
Summary:
There's Lexer::getBufferStart(), and we need getBufferEnd() to access
the whole input buffer in clang::format::reformat. We don't want to
rely on the fact that the Lexer::BufferEnd always points to '\0', as there can
be embedded '\0's as well.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
Reviewed By: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D916
llvm-svn: 183236
Specifying the load address for Darwin i386 dylibs was a performance
optimization for dyld that is not relevant for x86_64 or arm. We can just
remove this now.
llvm-svn: 183230
Rafael Espindola