This fixes PR15768, where the sret parameter and the 'this' parameter
are in the wrong order.
Instance methods compiled by MSVC never return records in registers,
they always return indirectly through an sret pointer. That sret
pointer always comes after the 'this' parameter, for both __cdecl and
__thiscall methods.
Unfortunately, the same is true for other calling conventions, so we'll
have to change the overall approach here relatively soon.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2664
llvm-svn: 200587
Due to statement expressions supported as GCC extension, it is possible
to put 'break' or 'continue' into a loop/switch statement but outside
its body, for example:
for ( ; ({ if (first) { first = 0; continue; } 0; }); )
This code is rejected by GCC if compiled in C mode but is accepted in C++
code. GCC bug 44715 tracks this discrepancy. Clang used code generation
that differs from GCC in both modes: only statement of the third
expression of 'for' behaves as if it was inside loop body.
This change makes code generation more close to GCC, considering 'break'
or 'continue' statement in condition and increment expressions of a
loop as it was inside the loop body. It also adds error for the cases
when 'break'/'continue' appear outside loop due to this syntax. If
code generation differ from GCC, warning is issued.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2518
llvm-svn: 199897
I misunderstood the discussion on this. The complexity here is
justified by the malloc overhead it saves.
This reverts commit r199302.
llvm-svn: 199700
Way back in r129652 we tried to avoid emitting an empty block at -O0
for switch cases that did nothing but break. This led to a poor
debugging experience as reported in PR9796, so we disabled the
optimization for -O0 but left it in for higher optimization levels in
r154420.
Since the whole point of this was to improve -O0, it's silly to keep
the complexity at all.
llvm-svn: 199302
adjustFallThroughCount isn't a good name, and the documentation was
even worse. This commit attempts to clarify what it's for and when to
use it.
llvm-svn: 199139
There are a number of places where we do PGO.setCurrentRegionCount(0)
directly after an unconditional branch. Give this operation a name so
that it's clearer why we're doing this.
llvm-svn: 199138
This call looks like it was an artifact of an earlier change, and
doesn't actually make sense. We begin a new region immediately anyway,
so it was mostly harmless.
llvm-svn: 199137
C and C++ don't emit an extra lexical scope for the compound statement
that is the body of an Objective-C method.
rdar://problem/15010825
llvm-svn: 198699
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
Not long ago I made the CodeGen of for loops simplify the condition at
-O0 in the same way we do for if and conditionals. Unfortunately this
ties how loops and simple conditions work together too tightly, which
makes features such as instrumentation based PGO awkward.
Ultimately, we should find a more general way to simplify the logic in
a given condition, but for now we'll just avoid using EmitBranchOnBool
for loops, like we already do for while and do loops.
llvm-svn: 195438
A while ago EmitForStmt was changed to explicitly evaluate the
condition expression and create a branch instead of using
EmitBranchOnBool, so that the condition expression could be used for
some cleanup logic. The cleanup stuff has since been reorganized, and
this is no longer necessary.
In EmitCXXForRange, the evaluated condition was never used for
anything else. The logic was presumably modeled on EmitForStmt.
llvm-svn: 193994
An initialization somehow found its way in between a comment and the
block of code the comment is about. Moving the initialization makes
this less confusing.
llvm-svn: 193993
CodeGenFunction is run on only one function - a new object is made for
each new function. I would add an assertion/flag to this effect, but
there's an exception: ObjC properties involve emitting helper functions
that are all emitted by the same CodeGenFunction object, so such a check
is not possible/correct.
llvm-svn: 189277
between a block assignment and the entry of the block function. In reality
this wouldn't work anyway because blocks are predominantly created
on-the-fly inside of an ObjC method invocation.
The proper fix for the ambiguity is to use -gcolumn-info to differentiate
the breakpoints.
This is expected to break some block-related darwin-gdb tests.
rdar://problem/14039866
llvm-svn: 184157
Two variables with the same name declared in two if conditions in the same
scope are no longer coalesced into one.
rdar://problem/14024005
llvm-svn: 183597
X86's 'y' inline assembly constraint represents an MMX register, this change
prevents Clang from hitting an assertion when passed an incompatible type to
deal with.
llvm-svn: 183467
EmitCapturedStmt creates a captured struct containing all of the captured
variables, and then emits a call to the outlined function. This is similar in
principle to EmitBlockLiteral.
GenerateCapturedFunction actually produces the outlined function. It is based
on GenerateBlockFunction, but is much simpler. The function type is determined
by the parameters that are in the CapturedDecl.
Some changes have been added to this patch that were reviewed as part of the
serialization patch and moving the parameters to the captured decl.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D640
llvm-svn: 181536
Un-break the gdb buildbot.
- Use the debug location of the return expression for the cleanup code
if the return expression is trivially evaluatable, regardless of the
number of stop points in the function.
- Ensure that any EH code in the cleanup still gets the line number of
the closing } of the lexical scope.
- Added a testcase with EH in the cleanup.
rdar://problem/13442648
llvm-svn: 181056
- Use the debug location of the return expression for the cleanup code
if the return expression is trivially evaluatable, regardless of the
number of stop points in the function.
- Ensure that any EH code in the cleanup still gets the line number of
the closing } of the lexical scope.
- Added a testcase with EH in the cleanup.
rdar://problem/13442648
llvm-svn: 180982
the actual parser and support arbitrary id-expressions.
We're actually basically set up to do arbitrary expressions here
if we wanted to.
Assembly operands permit things like A::x to be written regardless
of language mode, which forces us to embellish the evaluation
context logic somewhat. The logic here under template instantiation
is incorrect; we need to preserve the fact that an expression was
unevaluated. Of course, template instantiation in general is fishy
here because we have no way of delaying semantic analysis in the
MC parser. It's all just fishy.
I've also fixed the serialization of MS asm statements.
This commit depends on an LLVM commit.
llvm-svn: 180976
If there is cleanup code, the cleanup code gets the debug location of
the closing '}'. The subsequent ret IR-instruction does not get a
debug location. The return _expression_ will get the debug location
of the return statement.
If the function contains only a single, simple return statement,
the cleanup code may become the first breakpoint in the function.
In this case we set the debug location for the cleanup code
to the location of the return statement.
rdar://problem/13442648
llvm-svn: 180932
aggregate types in a profoundly wrong way that has to be
worked around in every call site, to getEvaluationKind,
which classifies and distinguishes between all of these
cases.
Also, normalize the API for loading and storing complexes.
I'm working on a larger patch and wanted to pull these
changes out, but it would have be annoying to detangle
them from each other.
llvm-svn: 176656
One of the gotchas (see changes to CodeGenFunction) was due to the fix in
r139416 (for PR10829). This only worked previously because the top level
lexical block would set the location to the end of the function, the debug
location would be updated (as per r139416), the location would be set to
the end of the function again (but that would no-op, since it was the same
as the previous location), then the return instruction would be emitted using
the debug location.
Once the top level lexical block was no longer emitted, the end-of-function
location change was causing the debug loc to be updated, regressing that bug.
llvm-svn: 173593
Reid Kleckner