The 128-bit input produces 64-bits of output and fills the upper 64-bits with 0. The mask only applies to the lower elements. But we can't represent this with a vselect like we normally do.
This also avoids the need to have a special X86ISD::SELECT when avx512bw isn't enabled since vselect v8i16 isn't legal there.
Fixes another instruction for PR34877.
llvm-svn: 350994
As discussed on llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128497.html>, we have
to be careful when trying to select the *w RV64M instructions. i32 is not a
legal type for RV64 in the RISC-V backend, so operations have been promoted by
the time they reach instruction selection. Information about whether the
operation was originally a 32-bit operations has been lost, and it's easy to
write incorrect patterns.
Similarly to the variable 32-bit shifts, a DAG combine on ANY_EXTEND will
produce a SIGN_EXTEND if this is likely to result in sdiv/udiv/urem being
selected (and so save instructions to sext/zext the input operands).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53230
llvm-svn: 350993
This restores support for selecting the SLLW/SRLW/SRAW instructions, which was
removed in rL348067 as the previous patterns made some unsafe assumptions.
Also see the related llvm-dev discussion
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128497.html>
Ultimately I didn't introduce a custom SelectionDAG node, but instead added a
DAG combine that inserts an AssertZext i5 on the shift amount for an i32
variable-length shift and also added an ANY_EXTEND DAG-combine which will
instead produce a SIGN_EXTEND for an i32 variable-length shift, increasing the
opportunity to safely select SLLW/SRLW/SRAW.
There are obviously different ways of addressing this (a number discussed in
the llvm-dev thread), so I'd welcome further feedback and comments.
Note that there are now some cases in
test/CodeGen/RISCV/rv64i-exhaustive-w-insts.ll where sraw/srlw/sllw is
selected even though sra/srl/sll could be used without any extra instructions.
Given both are semantically equivalent, there doesn't seem a good reason to
prefer one vs the other. Given that would require more logic to still select
sra/srl/sll in those cases, I've left it preferring the *w variants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56264
llvm-svn: 350992
We no longer need to extend mask scalars before bitcasting them to vXi1. This was only needed for the truncate intrinsics. And was really a bug in our lowering of them.
llvm-svn: 350991
We still use i8 for the load/store type. So we need to convert to/from i16 to around the mask type.
By doing this we get an i8->i16 extload which we can then pattern match to a KMOVW if the access is aligned.
llvm-svn: 350989
We can't properly represent this with a vselect since the upper elements of the result are supposed to be zeroed regardless of the mask.
This also reuses the new nodes even when the result type fits in 128 bits if the input is q/d and the result is w/b since vselect w/b using k-register condition isn't legal without avx512bw. Currently we're doing this even when avx512bw is enabled, but I might change that.
This fixes some of PR34877
llvm-svn: 350985
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40110.
This implements handling of undef operands for integer intrinsics in
ConstantFolding, in particular for the bitcounting intrinsics (ctpop,
cttz, ctlz), the with.overflow intrinsics, the saturating math
intrinsics and the funnel shift intrinsics.
The undef behavior follows what InstSimplify does for the general cas
e of non-constant operands. For the bitcount intrinsics (where
InstSimplify doesn't do undef handling -- there cannot be a combination
of an undef + non-constant operand) I'm using a 0 result if the intrinsic
is defined for zero and undef otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55950
llvm-svn: 350971
Teach x86 assembly operand parsing to distinguish between assembler
variable assigned to named registers and those assigned to immediate
values.
Reviewers: rnk, nickdesaulniers, void
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56287
llvm-svn: 350966
Summary:
When legalizing the result of a SELECT_CC node by promoting the
floating-point type, use the promoted-to type rather than the original
type.
Fix PR40273.
Reviewers: efriedma, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56566
llvm-svn: 350951
Summary:
Records in the module summary index whether the bitcode was compiled
with the option necessary to enable splitting the LTO unit
(e.g. -fsanitize=cfi, -fwhole-program-vtables, or -fsplit-lto-unit).
The information is passed down to the ModuleSummaryIndex builder via a
new module flag "EnableSplitLTOUnit", which is propagated onto a flag
on the summary index.
This is then used during the LTO link to check whether all linked
summaries were built with the same value of this flag. If not, an error
is issued when we detect a situation requiring whole program visibility
of the class hierarchy. This is the case when both of the following
conditions are met:
1) We are performing LowerTypeTests or Whole Program Devirtualization.
2) There are type tests or type checked loads in the code.
Note I have also changed the ThinLTOBitcodeWriter to also gate the
module splitting on the value of this flag.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: ormris, mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53890
llvm-svn: 350948
MergeFunc only deletes unused duplicate functions if they have local
linkage, but it should be safe to relax this to any "discardable if
unused" linkage type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56574
llvm-svn: 350939
Currently when a select has a constant value in one branch and the select feeds
a conditional branch (via a compare/ phi and compare) we unfold the select
statement. This results in threading the conditional branch later on. Similar
opportunity exists when a select (with a constant in one branch) feeds a
switch (via a phi node). The patch unfolds select under this condition.
A testcase is provided.
llvm-svn: 350931
Previously, we limited this transform to cases where the
extraction into the build vector happens from vectors of
the same type as the build vector, but that's not required.
There's a slight potential regression seen in the AVX512
result for phadd -- we're using the 256-bit flavor of the
instruction now even though the 128-bit subset is sufficient.
The same problem could already be seen in the AVX2 result.
Follow-up patches will attempt to narrow that back down.
llvm-svn: 350928
We were lowering the last step extract_vector_elt to a bitcast+truncate. Change it to use an extract_vector_elt of index 0 instead. Add isel patterns to do the equivalent of what the bitcast would have done. Plus an isel pattern for an any_extend+extract to prevent some regressions.
Finally add a DAG combine to turn v1i1 scalar_to_vector+extract_vector_elt of 0 into an extract_subvector.
This fixes some of the regressions from D350800.
llvm-svn: 350918
Summary:
We now use __stack_pointer global and global.get/global.set instruction.
This fixes the checking routine for stack_pointer writes accordingly.
This also fixes the existing __stack_pointer test in reg-stackify.ll:
That test used to pass not because of __stack_pointer clashes but
because the function `stackpointer_callee` was not marked as `readnone`,
so it was assumed to possibly write to memory arbitraily, and
`global.set` instruction was marked as `mayStore` in the .td definition,
so they were identified as intervening writes. After we added `readnone`
to its attribute, this test fails without this patch.
Reviewers: dschuff, sunfish
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, sbc100, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56094
llvm-svn: 350906
* Teach AsmParser to recognize @rn in distination operand as 0(rn).
* Do not allow Disassembler decoding instructions that have size more
than a number of input bytes.
* Fix UB in MSP430MCCodeEmitter.
Patch by Kristina Bessonova!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56547
llvm-svn: 350903
Summary:
This is a third attempt, but this time we have vetted it on Windows
first. The previous errors were due to an uninitialized class member.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56560
llvm-svn: 350901
Sanity will fail for this, since we're exploring getting a clobber
further than the sanity check expects.
Ideally we need to teach the sanity check to differentiate between the
two walkers based on the SkipSelf bool in the query.
llvm-svn: 350895
Summary:
The original patch addressed the use of BlockRPONumber by forcing a sequence point when accessing that map in a conditional. In short we found cases where that map was being accessed with blocks that had not yet been added to that structure. For context, I've kept the wall of text below, to what we are trying to fix, by always ensuring a updated BlockRPONumber.
== Backstory ==
I was investigating an ICE (segfault accessing a DenseMap item). This failure happened non-deterministically, with no apparent reason and only on a Windows build of LLVM (from October 2018).
After looking into the crashes (multiple core files) and running DynamoRio, the cores and DynamoRio (DR) log pointed to the same code in `GVN::performScalarPRE()`. The values in the map are unsigned integers, the keys are `llvm::BasicBlock*`. Our test case that triggered this warning and periodic crash is rather involved. But the problematic line looks to be:
GVN.cpp: Line 2197
```
if (BlockRPONumber[P] >= BlockRPONumber[CurrentBlock] &&
```
To test things out, I cooked up a patch that accessed the items in the map outside of the condition, by forcing a sequence point between accesses. DynamoRio stopped warning of the issue, and the test didn't seem to crash after 1000+ runs.
My investigation was on an older version of LLVM, (source from October this year). What it looks like was occurring is the following, and the assembly from the latest pull of llvm in December seems to confirm this might still be an issue; however, I have not witnessed the crash on more recent builds. Of course the asm in question is generated from the host compiler on that Windows box (not clang), but it hints that we might want to consider how we access the BlockRPONumber map in this conditional (line 2197, listed above). In any case, I don't think the host compiler is wrong, rather I think it is pointing out a possibly latent bug in llvm.
1) There is no sequence point for the `>=` operation.
2) A call to a `DenseMapBase::operator[]` can have the side effect of the map reallocating a larger store (more Buckets, via a call to `DenseMap::grow`).
3) It seems perfectly legal for a host compiler to generate assembly that stores the result of a call to `operator[]` on the stack (that's what my host compile of GVN.cpp is doing) . A second call to `operator[]` //might// encourage the map to 'grow' thus making any pointers to the map's store invalid. The `>=` compares the first and second values. If the first happens to be a pointer produced from operator[], it could be invalid when dereferenced at the time of comparison.
The assembly generated from the Window's host compiler does show the result of the first access to the map via `operator[]` produces a pointer to an unsigned int. And that pointer is being stored on the stack. If a second call to the map (which does occur) causes the map to grow, that address (on the stack) is now invalid.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55974
llvm-svn: 350880
Summary:
Step 2 in using MemorySSA in LICM:
Use MemorySSA in LICM to do sinking and hoisting, all under "EnableMSSALoopDependency" flag.
Promotion is disabled.
Enable flag in LICM sink/hoist tests to test correctness of this change. Moved one test which
relied on promotion, in order to test all sinking tests.
Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, gberry, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40375
llvm-svn: 350879
This extends to combineVSelectToShrunkBlend to be able to resimplify SHRUNKBLENDS that have already been created.
This should help some of the regressions from D56387
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56421
llvm-svn: 350875
Despite what the comment says, FCMP_UNE would be an OR not an AND. In the lowering code the first branch created still goes to the original destination. The second branch was exchanged to go to where the subsequent unconditional branch went. This is different than what we do for FCMP_OEQ where both branches that we create go to the original unconditional branch.
As far as I can tell, I think this means we don't need to exchange the branch target with the unconditional branch for FCMP_UNE at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56309
llvm-svn: 350873
This commit fixes the dwordx3/southern-islands failures that were found
in bugzilla https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40129, by not
generating the dwordx3 variants of load/store instructions that were
added to the ISA after southern islands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56434
llvm-svn: 350838
That is, remove many of the calls to Type::getNumContainedTypes(),
Type::subtypes(), and Type::getContainedType(N).
I'm not intending to remove these accessors -- they are
useful/necessary in some cases. However, removing the pointee type
from pointers would potentially break some uses, and reducing the
number of calls makes it easier to audit.
llvm-svn: 350835
This further improves compatibility with GNU as, allowing input such as the
following to be assembled:
.equ CONST, 0x123456
li a0, CONST
addi a0, a0, %lo(CONST)
.equ CONST, 1
slli a0, a0, CONST
Note that we don't have perfect compatibility with gas, as it will avoid
emitting a relocation in this case:
addi a0, a0, %lo(CONST2)
.equ CONST2, 0x123456
Thanks to Shiva Chen for suggesting a better way to approach this during review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52298
llvm-svn: 350831
When we use the partial-matching function on a 128-bit chunk, we must
account for the possibility that we've matched undef halves of the
original source vectors, so the outputs may need to be reset.
This should allow closing PR40243:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40243
llvm-svn: 350830
This is a partial fix for:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40243
...as seen in the integer test, we still need to correct the result when using the
existing (old) horizontal op matching function because it does not model the way
x86 256-bit horizontal ops return results (each 128-bit half is its own horizontal-op).
A potential follow-up change for that is discussed in the bug report - see also D56490.
This generally duplicates a lot of the existing matching code, but we can't just remove
that without introducing regressions, so the existing code is renamed and used less often.
Follow-ups may try to reduce that overlap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56450
llvm-svn: 350826
Summary:
This patch changes the legalization action for some half-precision floating-
point vector intrinsics (FSIN, FLOG, etc.) from Promote to Expand. These ops
are not supported in hardware for half-precision vectors, but promotion is
not always possible (for v8f16 operands). Changing the action to Expand fixes
an assertion failure in the legalizer when the frontend produces such ops.
In addition, a quick microbenchmark shows that, in the v4f16 case,
expanding introduces fewer spills and is therefore slightly faster than
promoting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56296
llvm-svn: 350825
Field ResourceUnitMask was incorrectly defined as a 'const unsigned' mask. It
should have been a 64 bit quantity instead. That means, ResourceUnitMask was
always implicitly truncated to a 32 bit quantity.
This issue has been found by inspection. Surprisingly, that bug was latent, and
it never negatively affected any existing upstream targets.
This patch fixes the wrong definition of ResourceUnitMask, and adds a bunch of
extra debug prints to help debugging potential issues related to invalid
processor resource masks.
llvm-svn: 350820
Allow to specify loop-unrolling with optional parameters explicitly
spelled out in -passes pipeline specification.
Introducing somewhat generic way of specifying parameters parsing via
FUNCTION_PASS_PARAMETRIZED pass registration.
Syntax of parametrized unroll pass name is as follows:
'unroll<' parameter-list '>'
Where parameter-list is ';'-separate list of parameter names and optlevel
optlevel: 'O[0-3]'
parameter: { 'partial' | 'peeling' | 'runtime' | 'upperbound' }
negated: 'no-' parameter
Example:
-passes=loop(unroll<O3;runtime;no-upperbound>)
this invokes LoopUnrollPass configured with OptLevel=3,
Runtime, no UpperBound, everything else by default.
llvm-svn: 350808
Add t2TEQrr to the map of instructions with can be reduced down into
a T1 instruction. This is a special case because TEQ just sets the
CPSR and doesn't write to a GPR, which is not the case for EOR. So,
we need to ensure that the EOR can write to the first operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56255
llvm-svn: 350801
Summary:
This pass replaces GR8/GR16/GR32/GR64 with their equivalent sized mask register classes. But VK32/VK64 aren't legal without AVX512BW. Apparently this mostly appears to work if the register coalescer is able to remove the VK32/VK64 register class reference. Or if we don't ever spill it. But there's no guarantee of that.
Another Intel employee managed to trigger a crash due to this with ISPC. Unfortunately, I've lost the test case he sent me at the time. I'm trying to get him to reproduce it for me. I'd like to get this in before 8.0 branches since its a little scary.
The regressions here are unfortunate, but I think we can make some improvements to DAG combine, load folding, etc. to fix them. Just not sure if we can get that done for 8.0.
Fixes PR39741
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56460
llvm-svn: 350800
Summary:
D55896 and D56029 add support to emit fixups for :abs_g0: , :abs_g1_s: , etc.
This patch adds the necessary enums and MCExpr needed for lowering these.
Reviewers: rnk, mstorsjo, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56037
llvm-svn: 350798
Craig Topper