This patch provides a means to specify section-names for global variables,
functions and static variables, using #pragma directives.
This feature is only defined to work sensibly for ELF targets.
One can specify section names as:
#pragma clang section bss="myBSS" data="myData" rodata="myRodata" text="myText"
One can "unspecify" a section name with empty string e.g.
#pragma clang section bss="" data="" text="" rodata=""
Reviewers: Roger Ferrer, Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33412
llvm-svn: 304705
__unaligned is not currently mangled in any way in the Itanium ABI. This causes
failures when using -fms-extensions and C++ in targets using Itanium ABI.
As suggested by @rsmith the simplest thing to do here is actually mangle the
qualifier as a vendor extension.
This patch also removes the change done in D31976 and updates its test to the
new reality.
This fixes
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33080https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33178
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33398
llvm-svn: 304523
Summary:
We need to emit barrier if the union field
is CXXRecordDecl because it might have vptrs. The testcode
was wrongly devirtualized. It also proves that having different
groups for different dynamic types is not sufficient.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: amharc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31830
llvm-svn: 304448
Summary:
We can emit vtable definition having inline function
if they are all emitted.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33437
llvm-svn: 304394
Credit goes to Gor Nishanov for putting together the fix in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33733!
This patch is essentially me patching it locally and writing some test
cases to convince myself that it was necessary for GNU statement
expressions with branches as well as coroutines. I'll ask Gor to land
his patch with just the coroutines test.
During LValue expression evaluation, references can be bound to
anything, really: call results, aggregate temporaries, local variables,
global variables, or indirect arguments. We really only want to spill
instructions that were emitted as part of expression evaluation, and
static allocas are not that.
llvm-svn: 304335
Amongst other, this will help LTO to correctly handle/honor files
compiled with O0, helping debugging failures.
It also seems in line with how we handle other options, like how
-fnoinline adds the appropriate attribute as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28404
llvm-svn: 304127
Re-commit r303463 now that LLVM is fixed and adjust some lit tests.
llvm::TargetLibraryInfo needs to know the size of wchar_t to work on
functions like `wcslen`. This patch changes clang to always emit the
wchar_size module flag (it would only do so for ARM previously).
This also adds an `assert()` to ensure the LLVM defaults based on the
target triple are in sync with clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32982
llvm-svn: 303478
Alloca always returns a pointer in alloca address space, which may
be different from the type defined by the language. For example,
in C++ the auto variables are in the default address space. Therefore
cast alloca to the expected address space when necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32248
llvm-svn: 303370
This fixes a regression introduced in r302915.
Using the lexical decl context is not necessary here for what r302915
wast trying to achieve. Not canonicalizing the NamespaceDecl in
getOrCreateNamespace is suficient.
rdar://problem/29339538
llvm-svn: 303222
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32933
Turns out clang wasn't really handling vla's (*) in C++11's for-range entirely correctly.
For e.g. This would lead to generation of buggy IR:
void foo(int b) {
int vla[b];
b = -1; // This store would affect the '__end = vla + b'
for (int &c : vla)
c = 0;
}
Additionally, code-gen would get confused when VLA's were reference-captured by lambdas, and then used in a for-range, which would result in an attempt to generate IR for '__end = vla + b' within the lambda's body - without any capture of 'b' - hence the assertion.
This patch modifies clang, so that for VLA's it translates the end pointer approximately into:
__end = __begin + sizeof(vla)/sizeof(vla->getElementType())
As opposed to the __end = __begin + b;
I considered passing a magic value into codegen - or having codegen special case the '__end' variable when it referred to a variably-modified type, but I decided against that approach, because it smelled like I would be increasing a complicated form of coupling, that I think would be even harder to maintain than the above approach (which can easily be optimized (-O1) to refer to the run-time bound that was calculated upon array's creation or copied into the lambda's closure object).
(*) why oh why gcc would you enable this by default?! ;)
llvm-svn: 303026
It's failing due to Hexagon calling convention lowering being broken (empty
structs are not passed even if they have nontrivial destructors / copy ctors).
llvm-svn: 302825
in list-initialization, run cleanups for the default argument after each
iteration of the initialization loop.
We previously only ran the destructor for any temporary once, at the end of the
complete loop, rather than once per iteration!
Re-commit of r302750, reverted in r302776.
llvm-svn: 302817
Revert "clang/test/CodeGenCXX/array-default-argument.cpp: Satisfy targets that have x86_thiscallcc."
This reverts commit r302750 and its fixup r302757 because the test is
still breaking on some of the ARM bots.
array-default-argument.cpp:20:12: error: expected string not found in input
// CHECK: {{call|invoke}}[[THISCALL:( x86_thiscallcc)?]] void @_ZN1AC1Ev([[TEMPORARY:.*]])
^
<stdin>:18:1: note: scanning from here
arrayctor.loop: ; preds = %arrayctor.loop, %entry
^
<stdin>:28:2: note: possible intended match here
call void @_Z1fv()
^
--
llvm-svn: 302776
in list-initialization, run cleanups for the default argument after each
iteration of the initialization loop.
We previously only ran the destructor for any temporary once, at the end of the
complete loop, rather than once per iteration!
llvm-svn: 302750
This avoids problems on code like this:
char buf[16];
__asm {
movups xmm0, [buf]
mov [buf], eax
}
The frontend size in this case (1) is wrong, and the register makes the
instruction matching unambiguous. There are also enough bytes available
that we shouldn't complain to the user that they are potentially using
an incorrectly sized instruction to access the variable.
Supersedes D32636 and D26586 and fixes PR28266
llvm-svn: 302179
Fix the nullability-assign check so that it can handle assignments into
C++ structs. Previously, such assignments were not instrumented.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan, enabling the existing test in ObjC++
mode, and building some Apple frameworks with -fsanitize=nullability.
llvm-svn: 301482
It's possible to determine the alignment of an alloca at compile-time.
Use this information to skip emitting some runtime alignment checks.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan.
This significantly reduces the amount of alignment checks we emit when
compiling X86ISelLowering.cpp. Here are the numbers from patched/unpatched
clangs based on r301361.
------------------------------------------
| Setup | # of alignment checks |
------------------------------------------
| unpatched, -O0 | 47195 |
| patched, -O0 | 30876 | (-34.6%)
------------------------------------------
llvm-svn: 301377
This switches from the prototype syntax in P0273R0 ('module' and 'module
implementation') to the consensus syntax 'export module' and 'module'.
In passing, drop the "module declaration must be first" enforcement, since EWG
seems to have changed its mind on that.
llvm-svn: 301056
Windows Itanium aims to use MSVC export and import semantics. Inner
class members shouldn't be exported on a dllexport explicit
instantiation definition of the outer class, and they shouldn't be
imported on a dllimport explicit instantiation declaration of the outer
class (instead a local copy should be emitted). We were doing the first
but not the second, and this mismatch can lead to link errors. Fix the
behavior and add tests for both.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32213
llvm-svn: 300804
Under -fms-extensions __unaligned is a type-qualifier that can be applied to a
non-static member function declaration.
This causes an assertion when mangling the name under Itanium, where that
qualifier is not mangled.
This patch justs makes the minimal change to avoid the crash and avoid mangling
__unaligned, as it currently happens with non-member functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31976
llvm-svn: 300686
LLVM has changed the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function
arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address*
of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an
alloca.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
rdar://problem/31205000
llvm-svn: 300523
The IR builder can constant-fold null checks if the pointer operand
points to a constant. If the "is-non-null" check is folded away to
"true", don't emit the null check + branch.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan.
This slightly reduces the amount of null checks we emit when compiling
X86ISelLowering.cpp. Here are the numbers from patched/unpatched clangs
based on r300371.
-------------------------------------
| Setup | # of null checks |
-------------------------------------
| unpatched, -O0 | 25251 |
| patched, -O0 | 23925 | (-5.3%)
-------------------------------------
llvm-svn: 300509
Pointers to the start of an alloca are non-null, so we don't need to
emit runtime null checks for them.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan.
This significantly reduces the amount of null checks we emit when
compiling X86ISelLowering.cpp. Here are the numbers from patched /
unpatched clangs based on r300371.
-------------------------------------
| Setup | # of null checks |
-------------------------------------
| unpatched, -O0 | 45439 |
| patched, -O0 | 25251 | (-44.4%)
-------------------------------------
llvm-svn: 300508
If a pointer is 1-byte aligned, there's no use in checking its
alignment. Somewhat surprisingly, ubsan can spend a significant amount
of time doing just that!
This loosely depends on D30283.
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan, and a stage2 ubsan build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30285
llvm-svn: 300371
This patch teaches ubsan to insert an alignment check for the 'this'
pointer at the start of each method/lambda. This allows clang to emit
significantly fewer alignment checks overall, because if 'this' is
aligned, so are its fields.
This is essentially the same thing r295515 does, but for the alignment
check instead of the null check. One difference is that we keep the
alignment checks on member expressions where the base is a DeclRefExpr.
There's an opportunity to diagnose unaligned accesses in this situation
(as pointed out by Eli, see PR32630).
Testing: check-clang, check-ubsan, and a stage2 ubsan build.
Along with the patch from D30285, this roughly halves the amount of
alignment checks we emit when compiling X86FastISel.cpp. Here are the
numbers from patched/unpatched clangs based on r298160.
------------------------------------------
| Setup | # of alignment checks |
------------------------------------------
| unpatched, -O0 | 24326 |
| patched, -O0 | 12717 | (-47.7%)
------------------------------------------
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30283
llvm-svn: 300370
Setting dllexport on a declaration has no effect, as we do not emit export
directives for declarations.
Part of the fix for PR32334.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31162
llvm-svn: 298330
It's possible to load out-of-range values from bitfields backed by a
boolean or an enum. Check for UB loads from bitfields.
This is the motivating example:
struct S {
BOOL b : 1; // Signed ObjC BOOL.
};
S s;
s.b = 1; // This is actually stored as -1.
if (s.b == 1) // Evaluates to false, -1 != 1.
...
Changes since the original commit:
- Single-bit bools are a special case (see CGF::EmitFromMemory), and we
can't avoid dealing with them when loading from a bitfield. Don't try to
insert a check in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30423
llvm-svn: 297389
It's possible to load out-of-range values from bitfields backed by a
boolean or an enum. Check for UB loads from bitfields.
This is the motivating example:
struct S {
BOOL b : 1; // Signed ObjC BOOL.
};
S s;
s.b = 1; // This is actually stored as -1.
if (s.b == 1) // Evaluates to false, -1 != 1.
...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30423
llvm-svn: 297298
This patch honors the unaligned type qualifier (currently available through he
keyword __unaligned and -fms-extensions) in CodeGen. In the current form the
patch affects declarations and expressions. It does not affect fields of
classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30166
llvm-svn: 297276
Javed Absar