Summary:
This patch extends the already existing facility to add 'const' to variables
to be more flexible and correct. The previous version did not consider pointers
as value AND pointee. For future automatic introduction for const-correctness
this shortcoming needs to be fixed.
It always allows configuration where the 'const' token is inserted, either on
the left side (if possible) or the right side.
It adds many unit-tests to the utility-function that did not exist before, as
the function was implicitly tested through clang-tidy checks. These
tests were not changed, as the API is still compatible.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, shuaiwang, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jdoerfert, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54395
This should fix the error:
```
mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Linalg/Utils/Utils.h:72:3: error: from definition of 'template<class LoopTy> mlir::edsc::GenericLoopNestRangeBuilder<LoopTy>::GenericLoopNestRangeBuilder(llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::edsc::ValueHandle*>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Value>)' [-fpermissive]
GenericLoopNestRangeBuilder(ArrayRef<edsc::ValueHandle *> ivs,
```
When the "disable-tail-calls" attribute was added, checks were added for
it in various backends. Now this code has proliferated, and it is
something the target is responsible for checking. Move that
responsibility back to the ISels (fast, global, and SD).
There's no major functionality change, except for targets that never
implemented this check.
This LLVM attribute was originally added in
d9699bc7bd (2015).
Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72118
The patch files section is redundant to https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html.
There is nothing clang specific here. We are talking about a monorepo after all.
While it may seem nice to have one single clang page which explains everything,
it's not: It doesn't cover the topics in sufficient depth, it's redundant to
other pages and it's hard to keep it up to date as we see with the svn
instructions.
When getting the file name form the line table prologue we assume that a
valid string form value can always be extracted as a string. If you look
at the implementation of DWARFormValue this is not necessarily true. I
hit this assertion from LLDB when I create a "dummy" DWARFContext that
was missing the string section.
Name: (X & (- Y)) - X -> - (X & (Y - 1)) (PR44448)
%negy = sub i8 0, %y
%unbiasedx = and i8 %negy, %x
%r = sub i8 %unbiasedx, %x
=>
%ymask = add i8 %y, -1
%xmasked = and i8 %ymask, %x
%r = sub i8 0, %xmasked
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/OIpla
This decreases use count of %x, may allow us to
later hoist said negation even further,
and results in marginally nicer X86 codegen.
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
Summary:
While it's perfectly reasonable for non-named decls such as
static_assert to resolve to themselves:
- nothing else ever resolves to them
- features based on references (hover, highlight, find refs etc) tend
to be uninteresting where only trivial references are possible
- returning NamedDecl is a more convenient API (we cast to it in many places)
- this aligns closer to findExplicitReferences/explicitReferenceTargets
This fixes a crash in explicitReferenceTargets: if the target is a
non-named decl then there's an invalid unchecked cast to NamedDecl.
In practice this means when hovering over e.g. a static_assert:
- before ac3f9e4842, we would show a (boring) hover card
- after ac3f9e4842, we would crash
- after this patch, we will show nothing
Reviewers: kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72163
Before:
class Foo {
@CommandLineFlags
.Add
@Features.foo
public void test() {}
}
Now:
class Foo {
@Features.foo
@CommandLineFlags.Add
public void test() { }
}
See also https://crbug.com/1034115
The OpenMP specification disallows having zero-length array
sections in the depend clause (OpenMP 5.0 2.17.11).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71969
If we replace a function with a new one because we rewrite the
signature, dead users may still refer to the old version. With this
patch we reuse the code that deals with dead functions, which the old
versions are, to avoid problems.
An inbounds GEP results in poison if the value is not "inbounds", not in
UB. We accidentally derived nonnull and dereferenceable from these
inbounds GEPs even in the absence of accesses that would make the poison
to UB.
Summary:
this allow much better support of codebases like the linux kernel that mix tabs and spaces.
-ftabstop=//Width// allow specifying how large tabs are considered to be.
Reviewers: xbolva00, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mstorsjo, cfe-commits, jyknight, riccibruno, rsmith, nathanchance
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71037
The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d
is too specific. It should/can just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)'
Even if we don't manage to fold `~` into B,
we have likely formed `ANDN` node.
Also, this way there's less similar-but-duplicate folds.
Name: X - (X & Y) -> X & (~Y)
%o = and i32 %X, %Y
%r = sub i32 %X, %o
=>
%n = xor i32 %Y, -1
%r = and i32 %X, %n
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/kOUl
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d
is too specific. It should just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)',
but we currently fail to sink that '~' into `(B - 1)`.
Name: ~(X - 1) -> (0 - X)
%o = add i32 %X, -1
%r = xor i32 %o, -1
=>
%r = sub i32 0, %X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/rjU
The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d
is too specific. It should just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)',
but we currently fail to sink that '~' into `(B - 1)`.
Name: ~(X - 1) -> (0 - X)
%o = add i32 %X, -1
%r = xor i32 %o, -1
=>
%r = sub i32 0, %X
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/rjU
While we do manage to fold integer-typed IR in middle-end,
we can't do that for the main motivational case of pointers.
There is @llvm.ptrmask() intrinsic which may or may not be helpful,
but i'm not sure it is fully considered canonical yet,
not everything is fully aware of it likely.
Name: PR44448 ptr - (ptr & C) -> ptr & (~C)
%bias = and i32 %ptr, C
%r = sub i32 %ptr, %bias
=>
%r = and i32 %ptr, ~C
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
Name: PR44448 ptr - (ptr & C) -> ptr & (~C)
%bias = and i32 %ptr, C
%r = sub i32 %ptr, %bias
=>
%r = and i32 %ptr, ~C
The main motivational pattern involes pointer-typed values,
so this transform can't really be done in middle-end.
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
The patch makes sure that the LastThrowing pointer does not point to any instruction deleted by call to DeleteDeadInstruction.
While iterating through the instructions the pass maintains a pointer to the lastThrowing Instruction. A call to deleteDeadInstruction deletes a dead store and other instructions feeding the original dead instruction which also become dead. The instruction pointed by the lastThrowing pointer could also be deleted by the call to DeleteDeadInstruction and thus it becomes a dangling pointer. Because of this, we see an error in the next iteration.
In the patch, we maintain a list of throwing instructions encountered previously and use the last non deleted throwing instruction from the container.
Reviewers: fhahn, bcahoon, efriedma
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65326
As shown in P44383:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44383
...we can't safely propagate a vector constant through this icmp fold
if that vector constant contains undefined elements.
We know that each defined element of the constant is safe though, so
find the first of those and replicate it into the formerly undef lanes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72101
This commit fixes shader ABI attributes to use `spv.` as the prefix
so that they match the dialect's namespace. This enables us to add
verification hooks in the SPIR-V dialect to verify them.
Reviewed By: mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72062
The V5 directory and filename tables had checks in to make sure we
hadn't read past the end of the line table prologue. Since previous
changes to the data extractor class ensure we never read past the end,
these checks are now redundant, so this patch removes them.
There is still a check to show that the whole prologue remains within
the prologue length.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71768
Remove description of language mode from the language
extensions and add a link to pdf document.
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72076
When they are free-standing, e.g. `struct X;` or `struct X {};`.
Although this complicates the common case (of free-standing class
declarations), this ensures the less common case (e.g. `struct X {} a;`)
are handled uniformly and produce similar syntax trees.
This removes the need to duplicate the LASTONLY check pattern and the
last part of the NONFATAL pattern in the modified test.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71757
The line tables in debug_line_malformed.s had contents that varied more
than was necessary for the testing, making it harder to follow what was
important. This patch normalises them so that they all share
more-or-less the same body. Additionally, it makes the testing for what
was printed more consistent, to show that the right parts of the line
table prologue and body are/are not parsed and printed.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71755
Some of the tables in debug_line_malformed.s were not being checked in
the NONFATAL checks in debug_line_invalid.test (only the warnings coming
from them were being checked). This made the test harder to follow.
Additionally, a later change will change the way the errors are handled
such that more of the line table will be printed. That will require
checks for these tables (or something equivalent) so that the difference
in behaviour can be observed. This patch adds checks for the three
tables that were missing checks.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71753
While we do manage to fold integer-typed IR in middle-end,
we can't do that for the main motivational case of pointers.
There is @llvm.ptrmask() intrinsic which may or may not be helpful,
but i'm not sure it is fully considered canonical yet,
not everything is fully aware of it likely.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZVdp
Name: ptr - (ptr & (alignment-1)) -> ptr & (0 - alignment)
%mask = add i64 %alignment, -1
%bias = and i64 %ptr, %mask
%r = sub i64 %ptr, %bias
=>
%highbitmask = sub i64 0, %alignment
%r = and i64 %ptr, %highbitmask
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
Jonas Toth