When guessing whether a closing paren is then end of a cast expression also
skip over pointer qualifiers while looking for TT_PointerOrReference.
This prevents some address-of and dereference operators from being parsed
as a binary operator.
Before:
x = (foo *const) * v;
x = (foo *const volatile restrict __attribute__((foo)) _Nonnull _Null_unspecified _Nonnull) & v;
After:
x = (foo *const)*v;
x = (foo *const volatile restrict __attribute__((foo)) _Nonnull _Null_unspecified _Nonnull)&v;
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86716
Motivating use case is ".cu.cc" extensions used in some bazel projects.
Alternative is to work around this with IncludeIsMainRegex in styles.
I proposed this approach because it seems like a better default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86597
Previously a NodeRole would generally be prefixed with the `NodeKind`,
we remove this prefix, as it we redundant and made tests more noisy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86636
* Generate `CallExpression` syntax node for all semantic nodes inheriting from
`CallExpr` with call-expression syntax - except `CUDAKernelCallExpr`.
* Implement all the accessors
* Arguments of `CallExpression` have their own syntax node which is based on
the `List` base API
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86544
We should see `NodeRole` information in the dump because that exposes how the
accessors will behave.
Functional changes in the dump:
* Surround Leaf tokens with `'`
* Append `Node` dumps with `NodeRole` information, except for unknown roles
* Append marks to `Node` dumps, instead of prepending
Non-functional changes:
* `::dumpTokens(llvm::raw_ostream, ArrayRef<syntax::Token>, const
SourceManager &SM)` always received as parameter a `syntax::Token *`
pointing to `Leaf::token()`. Changed the function to
`dumpLeaf(llvm::raw_ostream, syntax::Leaf *, const SourceManager&)`
* `dumpTree` acted on a Node, rename to `dumpNode`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85330
This patch moves FixedPointSemantics and APFixedPoint
from Clang to LLVM ADT.
This will make it easier to use the fixed-point
classes in LLVM for constructing an IR builder for
fixed-point and for reusing the APFixedPoint class
for constant evaluation purposes.
RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-August/144025.html
Reviewed By: leonardchan, rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85312
In this process we also create some other tests, in order to not lose
coverage when focusing on the annotated code
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85962
We add the method `SyntaxTreeTest::treeDumpEqualOnAnnotations`, which
allows us to compare the treeDump of only annotated code. This will reduce a
lot of noise from our `BuildTreeTest` and make them short and easier to
read.
We do that because:
* Big tests generated big tree dumps that could hardly serve as documentation.
* In most cases the tests didn't share setup, thus there was not much addition in lines of code.
We split tests for:
* `UserDefinedLiteral`
* `NestedBinaryOperator`
* `UserDefinedBinaryOperator`
* `UserDefinedPrefixOperator`
* `QualifiedId`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85819
For an user define `<`, `x < y` would yield the syntax tree:
```
BinaryOperatorExpression
|-IdExpression
| `-UnqualifiedId
| `-x
|-IdExpression
| `-UnqualifiedId
| `-<
`-IdExpression
`-UnqualifiedId
`-y
```
But there is no syntatic difference at call site between call site or
built-in `<`. As such they should generate the same syntax tree, namely:
```
BinaryOperatorExpression
|-IdExpression
| `-UnqualifiedId
| `-x
|-<
`-IdExpression
`-UnqualifiedId
`-y
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85750
Currently, changes to includes are applied to an entire rule. However,
include changes may be specific to particular edits within a rule (for example,
they may apply to one file but not another). Also, include changes may need to
carry metadata, just like other changes. So, we make include changes first-class
edits.
Reviewed By: tdl-g
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85734
There are already matchers for type template parameters and non-type template
parameters, but somehow no matcher exists for template template parameters
and I need it to write unit tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85536
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Use spaces to align binary and ternary expressions when using AlignOperands and UT_AlignWithSpaces.
This fixes an oversight in the new UT_AlignWithSpaces option (see D75034), which did not correctly identify the alignment of binary/ternary expressions.
Reviewed By: curdeius
Patch by: fickert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85600
This fixes a crash bug in clangd when used with modules. ASTWriter would
end up writing references to submodules into the PCH file, but upon
reading the submodules would not exists and
HeaderFileInfoTrait::ReadData would crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85532
Summary:
We want NestedNameSpecifier syntax nodes to be generally supported, not
only for `DeclRefExpr` and `DependentScopedDeclRefExpr`.
To achieve this we:
* Use the `RecursiveASTVisitor`'s API to traverse
`NestedNameSpecifierLoc`s and automatically create its syntax nodes
* Add links from the `NestedNameSpecifierLoc`s to their syntax nodes.
In this way, from any semantic construct that has a `NestedNameSpecifier`,
we implicitly generate its syntax node via RAV and we can easily access
this syntax node via the links we added.
On the frontend side, this patch recovers AIX static init implementation to
use the linkage type and function names Clang chooses for sinit related function.
On the backend side, this patch sets correct linkage and function names on aliases
created for sinit/sterm functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84534
Eduardo Caldas