This patch implements the teams directive for the NVPTX backend. It is different from the host code generation path as it:
Does not call kmpc_fork_teams. All necessary teams and threads are started upon touching the target region, when launching a CUDA kernel, and their execution is coordinated through sequential and parallel regions within the target region.
Does not call kmpc_push_num_teams even if a num_teams of thread_limit clause is present. Setting the number of teams and the thread limit is implemented by the nvptx-related runtime.
Please note that I am now passing a Clang Expr * to emitPushNumTeams instead of the originally chosen llvm::Value * type. The reason for that is that I want to avoid emitting expressions for num_teams and thread_limit if they are not needed in the target region.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17963
llvm-svn: 265304
Solution unifies interface of RegionCodeGenTy type to allow insert
runtime-specific code before/after main codegen action defined in
CGStmtOpenMP.cpp file. Runtime should not define its own RegionCodeGenTy
for general OpenMP directives, but must be allowed to insert its own
(required) code to support target specific codegen.
llvm-svn: 264700
Solution unifies interface of RegionCodeGenTy type to allow insert
runtime-specific code before/after main codegen action defined in
CGStmtOpenMP.cpp file. Runtime should not define its own RegionCodeGenTy
for general OpenMP directives, but must be allowed to insert its own
(required) code to support target specific codegen.
llvm-svn: 264576
Solution unifies interface of RegionCodeGenTy type to allow insert
runtime-specific code before/after main codegen action defined in
CGStmtOpenMP.cpp file. Runtime should not define its own RegionCodeGenTy
for general OpenMP directives, but must be allowed to insert its own
(required) code to support target specific codegen.
llvm-svn: 264569
Summary:
This patch adds base support for codegen of the target directive on the NVPTX device.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17877
Reworked test case after buildbot failure on windows.
Updated patch to integrate r263837 and test case nvptx_target_firstprivate_codegen.cpp.
llvm-svn: 264018
Summary:
Reworked test case after buildbot failure on windows.
This patch adds base support for codegen of the target directive on the NVPTX device.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17877
llvm-svn: 263783
Summary:
This patch adds base support for codegen of the target directive on the NVPTX device.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17877
llvm-svn: 263587
Summary:
This patch adds base support for codegen of the target directive on the NVPTX device.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17877
llvm-svn: 263552
Summary:
Different devices may in some cases require different code generation schemes in order to implement OpenMP. This is required not only for performance reasons, but also because it may not be possible to have the current (default) implementation working for these devices. E.g. GPU's cannot implement the same scheme a target such as powerpc or x86b would use, in the sense that it does not have the ability to fork threads, instead all the threads are always executing and need to be managed by the implementation.
This patch proposes a reorganization of the code in the OpenMP code generation to pave the way to have specialized implementation of OpenMP support. More than a "real" patch this is more a request for comments in order to understand if what is proposed is acceptable or if there are better/easier ways to do it.
In this patch part of the common OpenMP codegen infrastructure is moved to a new file under a new namespace (CGOpenMPCommon) so it can be shared between the default implementation and the specialized one. When CGOpenMPRuntime is created, an attempt to select a specialized implementation is done.
In the patch a specialization for nvptx targets is done which currently checks if the target is an OpenMP device and trap if it is not.
Let me know comments suggestions you may have.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, kkwli0, ABataev
Subscribers: Hahnfeld, cfe-commits, fraggamuffin, caomhin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16784
llvm-svn: 259977
Carlo Bertolli