Allow CallLowering::ArgInfo to contain more than one virtual register.
This is useful when passes split aggregates into several virtual
registers, but need to also provide information about the original type
to the call lowering. Used in follow-up patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63548
llvm-svn: 364509
Without the fix gcc 7.4.0 complains with
../lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp: In function 'bool getFauxShuffleMask(llvm::SDValue, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<int>&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::SDValue>&, llvm::SelectionDAG&)':
../lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp:6690:36: error: enumeral and non-enumeral type in conditional expression [-Werror=extra]
int Idx = (ZeroMask[j] ? SM_SentinelZero : (i + j + Ofs));
~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
llvm-svn: 364507
This patch rewrites the loop iteration to only visit every other element starting with element 0. And we work on the "even" element and "next" element at the same time. The "First" logic has been moved to the bottom of the loop and doesn't run on every element. I believe it could create dangling nodes previously since we didn't check if we were going to use SCALAR_TO_VECTOR for the first insertion. I got rid of the "First" variable and just do a null check on V which should be equivalent. We also no longer use undef as the starting V for vectors with no zeroes to avoid false dependencies. This matches v8i16.
I've changed all the extends and OR operations to use MVT::i32 since that's what they'll be promoted to anyway. I've tried to use zero_extend only when necessary and use any_extend otherwise. This resulted in some improvements in tests where we are now able to promote aligned (i32 (extload i8)) to a 32-bit load.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63702
llvm-svn: 364469
This was trying to optimize concat_vectors with zero of setcc or
kand instructions. But I think it produced the same code we
produce for a concat_vectors with 0 even it it doesn't come from
one of those operations.
llvm-svn: 364463
Create a per-byte shuffle mask based on the computeKnownBits from each operand - if for each byte we have a known zero (or both) then it can be safely blended.
Fixes PR41545
llvm-svn: 364458
We have (almost) no target opcodes that have scalar/vector equivalents - for now assume we can't scalarize them (we can add exceptions if we need to).
llvm-svn: 364429
Summary:
The one thing of note here is that the 'bitwidth' constant (32/64) was previously pessimistic.
Given `x & (-1 >> (C - z))`, we were taking `C` to be `bitwidth(x)`, but in reality
we want `(-1 >> (C - z))` pattern to mean "low z bits must be all-ones".
And for that, `C` should be `bitwidth(-1 >> (C - z))`, i.e. of the shift operation itself.
Last pattern D does not seem to exhibit any of these truncation issues.
Although it has the opposite problem - if we extract low bits (no shift) from i64,
and then truncate to i32, then we fail to shrink this 64-bit extraction into 32-bit extraction.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62806
llvm-svn: 364419
Summary:
(Not so) boringly identical to pattern a (D62786)
Not yet sure how do deal with the last pattern c.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62793
llvm-svn: 364418
Summary:
Finally tying up loose ends here.
The problem is quite simple:
If we have pattern `(x >> start) & (1 << nbits) - 1`,
and then truncate the result, that truncation will be propagated upwards,
into the `and`. And that isn't currently handled.
I'm only fixing pattern `a` here,
the same fix will be needed for patterns `b`/`c` too.
I *think* this isn't missing any extra legality checks,
since we only look past truncations. Similary, i don't think
we can get any other truncation there other than i64->i32.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62786
llvm-svn: 364417
Ideally this needs to be a generic combine in DAGCombiner::visitEXTRACT_SUBVECTOR but there's some nasty regressions in aarch64 due to neon shuffles not handling bitcasts at all.....
llvm-svn: 364407
truncateVectorWithPACK is often used in conjunction with ComputeNumSignBits which struggles when peeking through bitcasts.
This fix tries to avoid bitcast(shuffle(bitcast())) patterns in the 256-bit 64-bit sublane shuffles so we can still see through at least until lowering when the shuffles will need to be bitcasted to widen the shuffle type.
llvm-svn: 364401
I believe these all get canonicalized to vzext_movl. The only case where that wasn't true was when the load was loadi32 and the load was an extload aligned to 32 bits. But that was fixed in r364207.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63701
llvm-svn: 364337
We currently have some isel patterns for treating vzmovl+load the same as vzload, but that shrinks the load which we shouldn't do if the load is volatile.
Rather than adding isel checks for volatile. This patch removes the patterns and teachs DAG combine to merge them into vzload when its legal to do so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63665
llvm-svn: 364333
In LowerBuildVectorv16i8 we took care to use an any_extend if the first pair is in the lower 16-bits of the vector and no elements are 0. So bits [31:16] will be undefined. But we still emitted a vzext_movl to ensure that bits [127:32] are 0. If we don't need any zeroes we should be consistent and make all of 127:16 undefined.
In LowerBuildVectorv8i16 we can just delete the vzext_movl code because we only use the scalar_to_vector when there are no zeroes. So the vzext_movl is always unnecessary.
Found while investigating whether (vzext_movl (scalar_to_vector (loadi32)) patterns are necessary. At least one of the cases where they were necessary was where the loadi32 matched 32-bit aligned 16-bit extload. Seemed weird that we required vzext_movl for that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63700
llvm-svn: 364207
This patch does a few things to start cleaning up the isFNEG function.
-Remove the Op0/Op1 peekThroughBitcast calls that seem unnecessary. getTargetConstantBitsFromNode has its own peekThroughBitcast inside. And we have a separate peekThroughBitcast on the return value.
-Add a check of the scalar size after the first peekThroughBitcast to ensure we haven't changed the element size and just did something like f32->i32 or f64->i64.
-Remove an unnecessary check that Op1's type is floating point after the peekThroughBitcast. We're just going to look for a bit pattern from a constant. We don't care about its type.
-Add VT checks on several places that consume the return value of isFNEG. Due to the peekThroughBitcasts inside, the type of the return value isn't guaranteed. So its not safe to use it to build other nodes without ensuring the type matches the type being used to build the node. We might be able to replace these checks with bitcasts instead, but I don't have a test case so a bail out check seemed better for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63683
llvm-svn: 364206
Avoids using a plain unsigned for registers throughoug codegen.
Doesn't attempt to change every register use, just something a little
more than the set needed to build after changing the return type of
MachineOperand::getReg().
llvm-svn: 364191
Ideally we'd be able to represent this truncate as a any_extend to
v16i32 and a truncate, but SelectionDAG doens't know how to not
fold those together.
We have isel patterns to use a vpmovzxwd+vpdmovdb for the truncate,
but we aren't able to simultaneously fold the load and the store
from the isel pattern. By pulling the truncate into the store we
can successfully hide it from the DAG combiner. Then we can isel
pattern match the truncstore and load+any_extend separately.
llvm-svn: 364163
Rename masked_load/masked_store to masked_ld/masked_st to discourage
their direct use. We need to check truncating/extending and
compressing/expanding before using them. This revealed that
our scalar masked load/store patterns were misusing these.
With those out of the way, renamed masked_load_unaligned and
masked_store_unaligned to remove the "_unaligned". We didn't
check the alignment anyway so the name was somewhat misleading.
Make the aligned versions inherit from masked_load/store instead
from a separate identical version. Merge the 3 different alignments
PatFrags into a single version that uses the VT from the SDNode to
determine the size that the alignment needs to match.
llvm-svn: 364150
128/256 bit scalar_to_vectors are canonicalized to (insert_subvector undef, (scalar_to_vector), 0). We have isel patterns that try to match this pattern being used by a vzmovl to use a 128-bit instruction and a subreg_to_reg.
This patch detects the insert_subvector undef portion of this and pulls it through the vzmovl, creating a narrower vzmovl and an insert_subvector allzeroes. We can then match the insertsubvector into a subreg_to_reg operation by itself. Then we can fall back on existing (vzmovl (scalar_to_vector)) patterns.
Note, while the scalar_to_vector case is the motivating case I didn't restrict to just that case. I'm also wondering about shrinking any 256/512 vzmovl to an extract_subvector+vzmovl+insert_subvector(allzeros) but I fear that would have bad implications to shuffle combining.
I also think there is more canonicalization we can do with vzmovl with loads or scalar_to_vector with loads to create vzload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63512
llvm-svn: 364095
This should be unreachable, but bugs can make it reachable. This
adds a debug print so we can see the bad node in the output when
the llvm_unreachable triggers.
llvm-svn: 364091
We already use vmovq for v2i64/v2f64 vzmovl. But we were using a
blendpd+xorpd for v4i64/v4f64/v8i64/v8f64 under opt speed. Or
movsd+xorpd under optsize.
I think the blend with 0 or movss/d is only needed for
vXi32 where we don't have an instruction that can move 32
bits from one xmm to another while zeroing upper bits.
movq is no worse than blendpd on any known CPUs.
llvm-svn: 364079
The sat add/sub tests still have unnecessary extract_subvector((vandnps ymm, ymm), 0) uses that should be split to (vandnps (extract_subvector(ymm, 0), extract_subvector(ymm, 0)), but its getting better.
llvm-svn: 364038
Summary:
BLSI sets the C flag is the input is not zero. So if its followed
by a TEST of the input where only the Z flag is consumed, we can
replace it with the opposite check of the C flag.
We should be able to do the same for BLSMSK and BLSR, but the
naive test case for those is being optimized to a subo by
CodeGenPrepare.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63589
llvm-svn: 363957
The caller of this is looking for comparisons of the input
to these instructions with 0. But the memory instructions
input is an addess not a value input in a register.
llvm-svn: 363907
This is an exception to the rule that we should prefer xmm ops to ymm ops.
As shown in PR42305:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42305
...the store folding opportunity with vextractf128 may result in better
perf by reducing the instruction count.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63517
llvm-svn: 363853
Diana Picus