These tests in particular try to use escaped square brackets as an
argument to grep, which is failing for me with native win32 python. It
appears the backslash is being lost near the CreateProcess*() call.
llvm-svn: 173506
loops over instructions in the basic block or the use-def list of the
value, neither of which are really efficient when repeatedly querying
about values in the same basic block.
What's more, we already know that the CondBB is small, and so we can do
a much more efficient test by counting the uses in CondBB, and seeing if
those account for all of the uses.
Finally, we shouldn't blanket fail on any such instruction, instead we
should conservatively assume that those instructions are part of the
cost.
Note that this actually fixes a bug in the pass because
isUsedInBasicBlock has a really terrible bug in it. I'll fix that in my
next commit, but the fix for it would make this code suddenly take the
compile time hit I thought it already was taking, so I wanted to go
ahead and migrate this code to a faster & better pattern.
The bug in isUsedInBasicBlock was also causing other tests to test the
wrong thing entirely: for example we weren't actually disabling
speculation for floating point operations as intended (and tested), but
the test passed because we failed to speculate them due to the
isUsedInBasicBlock failure.
llvm-svn: 173417
Original commit message:
Plug TTI into the speculation logic, giving it a real cost interface
that can be specialized by targets.
The goal here is not to be more aggressive, but to just be more accurate
with very obvious cases. There are instructions which are known to be
truly free and which were not being modeled as such in this code -- see
the regression test which is distilled from an inner loop of zlib.
Everywhere the TTI cost model is insufficiently conservative I've added
explicit checks with FIXME comments to go add proper modelling of these
cost factors.
If this causes regressions, the likely solution is to make TTI even more
conservative in its cost estimates, but test cases will help here.
llvm-svn: 173357
We use constant folding to see if an intrinsic evaluates to the same value as a
constant that we know. If we don't take the undefinedness into account we get a
value that doesn't match the actual implementation, and miscompiled code.
This was uncovered by Chandler's simplifycfg changes.
llvm-svn: 173356
that can be specialized by targets.
The goal here is not to be more aggressive, but to just be more accurate
with very obvious cases. There are instructions which are known to be
truly free and which were not being modeled as such in this code -- see
the regression test which is distilled from an inner loop of zlib.
Everywhere the TTI cost model is insufficiently conservative I've added
explicit checks with FIXME comments to go add proper modelling of these
cost factors.
If this causes regressions, the likely solution is to make TTI even more
conservative in its cost estimates, but test cases will help here.
llvm-svn: 173342
a cost fuction that seems both a bit ad-hoc and also poorly suited to
evaluating constant expressions.
Notably, it is missing any support for trivial expressions such as
'inttoptr'. I could fix this routine, but it isn't clear to me all of
the constraints its other users are operating under.
The core protection that seems relevant here is avoiding the formation
of a select instruction wich a further chain of select operations in
a constant expression operand. Just explicitly encode that constraint.
Also, update the comments and organization here to make it clear where
this needs to go -- this should be driven off of real cost measurements
which take into account the number of constants expressions and the
depth of the constant expression tree.
llvm-svn: 173340
SSPStrong applies a heuristic to insert stack protectors in these situations:
* A Protector is required for functions which contain an array, regardless of
type or length.
* A Protector is required for functions which contain a structure/union which
contains an array, regardless of type or length. Note, there is no limit to
the depth of nesting.
* A protector is required when the address of a local variable (i.e., stack
based variable) is exposed. (E.g., such as through a local whose address is
taken as part of the RHS of an assignment or a local whose address is taken as
part of a function argument.)
This patch implements the SSPString attribute to be equivalent to
SSPRequired. This will change in a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 173230
We ignore the cpu frontend and focus on pipeline utilization. We do this because we
don't have a good way to estimate the loop body size at the IR level.
llvm-svn: 172964
This separates the check for "too few elements to run the vector loop" from the
"memory overlap" check, giving a lot nicer code and allowing to skip the memory
checks when we're not going to execute the vector code anyways. We still leave
the decision of whether to emit the memory checks as branches or setccs, but it
seems to be doing a good job. If ugly code pops up we may want to emit them as
separate blocks too. Small speedup on MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso.
Most of this is legwork to allow multiple bypass blocks while updating PHIs,
dominators and loop info.
llvm-svn: 172902
Okay, here's how to reproduce the problem:
1) Build a Release (or Release+Asserts) version of clang in the normal way.
2) Using the clang & clang++ binaries from (1), build a Release (or
Release+Asserts) version of the same sources, but this time enable LTO ---
specify the `-flto' flag on the command line.
3) Run the ARC migrator tests:
$ arcmt-test --args -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only -x objective-c++ ./src/tools/clang/test/ARCMT/cxx-rewrite.mm
You'll see that the output isn't correct (the whitespace is off).
The mis-compile is in the function `RewriteBuffer::RemoveText' in the
clang/lib/Rewrite/Core/Rewriter.cpp file. When that function and RewriteRope.cpp
are compiled with LTO and the `arcmt-test' executable is regenerated, you'll see
the error. When those files are not LTO'ed, then the output of the `arcmt-test'
is fine.
It is *really* hard to get a testcase out of this. I'll file a PR with what I
have currently.
--- Reverse-merging r172363 into '.':
U include/llvm/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.h
U lib/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp
--- Reverse-merging r171325 into '.':
U test/Transforms/InstCombine/objsize.ll
G include/llvm/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.h
G lib/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp
llvm-svn: 172756
some optimization opportunities (in the enclosing supper-expressions).
rule 1. (-0.0 - X ) * Y => -0.0 - (X * Y)
if expression "-0.0 - X" has only one reference.
rule 2. (0.0 - X ) * Y => -0.0 - (X * Y)
if expression "0.0 - X" has only one reference, and
the instruction is marked "noSignedZero".
2. Eliminate negation (The compiler was already able to handle these
opt if the 0.0s are replaced with -0.0.)
rule 3: (0.0 - X) * (0.0 - Y) => X * Y
rule 4: (0.0 - X) * C => X * -C
if the expr is flagged "noSignedZero".
3.
Rule 5: (X*Y) * X => (X*X) * Y
if X!=Y and the expression is flagged with "UnsafeAlgebra".
The purpose of this transformation is two-fold:
a) to form a power expression (of X).
b) potentially shorten the critical path: After transformation, the
latency of the instruction Y is amortized by the expression of X*X,
and therefore Y is in a "less critical" position compared to what it
was before the transformation.
4. Remove the InstCombine code about simplifiying "X * select".
The reasons are following:
a) The "select" is somewhat architecture-dependent, therefore the
higher level optimizers are not able to precisely predict if
the simplification really yields any performance improvement
or not.
b) The "select" operator is bit complicate, and tends to obscure
optimization opportunities. It is btter to keep it as low as
possible in expr tree, and let CodeGen to tackle the optimization.
llvm-svn: 172551
Test was failing for clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 build-bot configuration.
The reason for the failure was the test was using hardcoded names.
The attached patch fixes this failure by replacing the hard-coded variables
names with pattern-matched variable names.
Patch by Manish Verma, ARM
llvm-svn: 172534
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C_A: reassociation is allowed
C_R: reciprocal of a constant C is appropriate, which means
- 1/C is exact, or
- reciprocal is allowed and 1/C is neither a special value nor a denormal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
rule1: (X/C1) / C2 => X / (C2*C1) (if C_A)
=> X * (1/(C2*C1)) (if C_A && C_R)
rule 2: X*C1 / C2 => X * (C1/C2) if C_A
rule 3: (X/Y)/Z = > X/(Y*Z) (if C_A && at least one of Y and Z is symbolic value)
rule 4: Z/(X/Y) = > (Z*Y)/X (similar to rule3)
rule 5: C1/(X*C2) => (C1/C2) / X (if C_A)
rule 6: C1/(X/C2) => (C1*C2) / X (if C_A)
rule 7: C1/(C2/X) => (C1/C2) * X (if C_A)
llvm-svn: 172488
The reason that this occurs is that tail calling objc_autorelease eventually
tail calls -[NSObject autorelease] which supports fast autorelease. This can
cause us to violate the semantic gaurantees of __autoreleasing variables that
assignment to an __autoreleasing variables always yields an object that is
placed into the innermost autorelease pool.
The fix included in this patch works by:
1. In the peephole optimization function OptimizeIndividualFunctions, always
remove tail call from objc_autorelease.
2. Whenever we convert to/from an objc_autorelease, set/unset the tail call
keyword as appropriate.
*NOTE* I also handled the case where objc_autorelease is converted in
OptimizeReturns to an autoreleaseRV which still violates the ARC semantics. I
will be removing that in a later patch and I wanted to make sure that the tree
is in a consistent state vis-a-vis ARC always.
Additionally some test cases are provided and all tests that have tail call marked
objc_autorelease keywords have been modified so that tail call has been removed.
*NOTE* One test fails due to a separate bug that I am going to commit soon. Thus
I marked the check line TMP: instead of CHECK: so make check does not fail.
llvm-svn: 172287
the target if it supports the different CAST types. We didn't do this
on X86 because of the different register sizes and types, but on ARM
this makes sense.
llvm-svn: 172245
We don't have a detailed analysis on which values are vectorized and which stay scalars in the vectorized loop so we use
another method. We look at reduction variables, loads and stores, which are the only ways to get information in and out
of loop iterations. If the data types are extended and truncated then the cost model will catch the cost of the vector
zext/sext/trunc operations.
llvm-svn: 172178
Messages:
Converted test case trivial_codegen_tailcall.ll to use FileCheck.
Converted test return_constant.ll to use FileCheck instead of grep.
Converted test reorder_load.ll to use FileCheck instead of grep.
Converted test intervening-inst.ll to use FileCheck instead of grep.
llvm-svn: 172171
Chandler Carruth